Zimmerman NOT guilty

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
Well...there IS THIS version of events too. I mean, most common sensed people COULD be wrong I suppose. Then again, man may land on the Sun soon.

Sequence of events according to the media

>8th Grader Trayvon Martin is walking home in his graduation cap and gown
>Aryan Nation member George Zimmerman driving around in his Confederate Flag draped pickup
>Zimmerman spots Trayvon through the night by the glow of his halo
>The Klansman takes chase
>The football star nearly outruns him, but he is trapped by a "do not enter" sign
>Faced with certain death or disobeying the law, he makes his stand
>Trayvon attempts to reason his attacker, but the illiterate racist will have none of it
>Zimmerman steps out of his vehicle and asks "Any last words?"
>Trayvon looks his executioner in the eye and replies "World Peace"
>"WHITE POWER!" exclaims Zimmerman as he unloads with his fully-automatic assault rifle
>If not for the Republican party he may have survived, but the skinhead's extended magazine, unfettered by their legislation unloads hundreds of rounds into the future Nobel Piece Prize recipient
>Zimmerman then bashes his own head into the curb repeatedly screaming "help me!"
>When he is finished, Hitler himself steps back into his gas-guzzling vehicle
>As Trayvon lay dying, the last thing he sees is the "Bush Cheney 2004" bumper sticker disapear into the night
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,162
9,435
113
Washington DC
I think this case ended up being determined by the antics of the prosecution.

That Zimmerman killed Martin was beyond question.

That Zimmerman acted in self-defence was beyond question.

However. . .

There is a legal doctrine that the person who starts a conflict cannot claim self defence. Hence, the key question in this trial, which was never fleshed out properly, is did Zimmerman take any criminal action against Martin before Martin began beating on him?

There was some testimony that Zimmerman reached for or grabbed at Martin, which caused Martin to respond violently. If this is true, Zimmerman could not use self-defence (grabbing at someone without justification is criminal assault). Yet, near as I could tell from my admittedly less-than-total attention to the case, this question was never really resolved; nor did the prosecution focus on it as the key to the case.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
lol.... if we're splitting hairs, saying it was self defense, brought on himself.... what do you think they're saying? 'Deserved'

I don't see it that way at all.

No.... either someone is doing something that warrants killing them, or they are not. That is the basis of self defense law. You're mincing words.

Yes... I get that. Not deserved though.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
No.... either someone is doing something that warrants killing them, or they are not. That is the basis of self defense law. You're mincing words.

Main Entry: just Part of Speech: adjective Definition: suitable, appropriate Synonyms: apt, befitting, condign, deserved, due, felicitous, fit, fitting, happy, justified , legitimate, meet, merited, proper, reasonable, requisite, right, rightful, well-deserved Antonyms: inappropriate, unfitting, unjust, unsuitable, unsuited

Does having your head smashed against the concrete over and over qualify as justification?

A Florida jury thought so
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I think this case ended up being determined by the antics of the prosecution.

That Zimmerman killed Martin was beyond question.

That Zimmerman acted in self-defence was beyond question.

However. . .

There is a legal doctrine that the person who starts a conflict cannot claim self defence. Hence, the key question in this trial, which was never fleshed out properly, is did Zimmerman take any criminal action against Martin before Martin began beating on him?

No.

There was some testimony that Zimmerman reached for or grabbed at Martin, which caused Martin to respond violently. If this is true, Zimmerman could not use self-defence (grabbing at someone without justification is criminal assault). Yet, near as I could tell from my admittedly less-than-total attention to the case, this question was never really resolved; nor did the prosecution focus on it as the key to the case.

Could you be so kind to say which witness testified to Zimmerman reaching out or grabbing Martin?

I wonder why the prosecution did not focus on that? lol

(not really wondering... I know the answer)
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,162
9,435
113
Washington DC
No.



Could you be so kind to say which witness testified to Zimmerman reaching out or grabbing Martin?

I wonder why the prosecution did not focus on that? lol

(not really wondering... I know the answer)
I believe it was Rachel Jeantel (spelling uncertain). Could you fill me in? As I said, my attention to the testimony was less than complete.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
lol.... if we're splitting hairs, saying it was self defense, brought on himself.... what do you think they're saying? 'Deserved'

All they are saying is there is not enough evidence to convict for illegal homicide. (which the facts seem to bear out)
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
Theoretical scenario: Zimmerman follows Martin, because he is suspicious looking, the police get there, search Martin, and find stolen articles on him, would all the politically correct start accusing Zimmerman of stalking and call for Martin's release????
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,162
9,435
113
Washington DC
Theoretical scenario: Zimmerman follows Martin, because he is suspicious looking, the police get there, search Martin, and find stolen articles on him, would all the politically correct start accusing Zimmerman of stalking and call for Martin's release????
Yep, because the "politically correct" are all witless librul communists who hate America and puppies and support terrorists.
 

B00Mer

Make Canada Great Again
Sep 6, 2008
47,127
8,145
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.canadianforums.ca
 

gore0bsessed

Time Out
Oct 23, 2011
2,414
0
36
Alex Fraser

Dear George Zimmerman,

For the rest of your life you are now going to feel what its like to be a black man in America.

You will feel people stare at you. Judging you for what you think are unfair reasons. You will lose out on getting jobs for something you feel is outside of your control. You will believe yourself to be an upstanding citizen and wonder why people choose to not see that.

People will cross the street when they see you coming. They will call you hurtful names. It will drive you so insane some days that you'll want to scream at the top of your lungs. But you will have to wake up the next day, put on firm look and push through life.

I bet you never thought that by shooting a black male you'd end up inheriting all of his struggles.

Enjoy your "freedom."

Sincerely,

A black male who could've been Trayvon Martin
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
117,209
14,249
113
Low Earth Orbit
Almost.

There was not enough evidence to convict, so he is not guilty.

We will never know if he was innocent or not......but he has to be presumed innocent in the eyes of the law.
It doesn't make him innocent of killing somebody and NEVER will.

Nice.

Hey, apologists:

Robin? Now there is a option Zipperman should have considered. It would have legitimized his claim of doing neighbourhood watch.