If BC prevents Alberta blue water access at will where then goes Canada?
Confederation dictates that road, rail and pipeline access exists nationally.
If it does not exist there what then is the point of Confederation at all?
As far as the extensive multi year review of the Gateway pipeline, if it finds in favor of the pipeline and BC rejects that then why would any pipeline in BC be acceptable?
Should they then all be shut down?
Should they all be shut down Nationally?
60% of BC's natural gas flows through Alberta.
Should Alberta shut down those lines?
Where is the benefit to Alberta?
Where is the benefit to Alberta's Indigenous peoples?
As to oil spills while shipping.
The Port of Vancouver is either the largest or second largest port on the west coast of North America.
What goes in and out of that port is mind boggling.
Pesticides, Herbicides, Mutagens, Radioactives, undetectable plastic landmines and other exportable Canadian munitions, pharamacueticals galore, every kind of petroleum feedstock derivative you can imagine and on top of all that crap boatloads full of Chinese junk destined for Walmart's primarily in Ontario and Quebec.
If that stuff goes in the water it could, potentially, be far far worse than a load of heavy crude.
Should the Federal Government shut down the port of Vancouver?
What should be allowed for shipping, unicorns and moonbeams?
Who decides?
How?
How does allowing all that crap to cross Alberta's or Saskatchewan's borders by truck or by rail benefit those provinces?
It does not.
Show me the money?
How about Alberta, Sask and Manitoba shut moving all that road and rail imported and exported crap right down?
And how about all the Indigenous Peoples of the Prairies, where then is their cut?
And so goes Confederation.
If BC can landlock Alberta or Saskatchewan at will, what then is the point of Canada?
If oil pipelines are evil then shut them down, all of them.
If shipping dangerous goods off the coast of BC is too great a risk, shut down the west coast ports, all of them.