Muslims patrol east London hunting down drinkers and immodestly dressed women

[earth_as_one]

Bull crap. If Muslims are supposed to obey the law of the land why are they demanding Sharia law in Canada? Why do they force their women to wear tents in Canada?

I am against anyone interfering in the right of people to choose. I support a woman's right to choose what to wear. I oppose Islamophobic bigots and their efforts to pass laws restricting a woman's right to choose. Canada already has many laws to deal with one individual attempting to limit another persons rights and freedoms.

In Canada, Muslims are not demanding Sharia Law.

...In 1991, Ontario was looking for ways to ease the burdens of a backlogged court system. So the province changed its Arbitration Act to allow "faith-based arbitration" – a system where Muslims, Jews, Catholics and members of other faiths could use the guiding principles of their religions to settle family disputes such as divorce, custody and inheritances outside the court system.

It's voluntary – both parties (a husband and wife) have to agree to go through the process. But once they do, the decisions rendered by the tribunal are binding.

The Ontario government has been reviewing its Arbitration Act and on Dec. 20, 2004, it released a report conducted by former attorney general Marion Boyd. Among her 46 recommendations was that:

The Arbitration Act should continue to allow disputes to be arbitrated using religious law, if the safeguards currently prescribed and recommended by this review are observed.

...How would Shariah law apply in Ontario?
First, it's not clear the term "Shariah law" would even be used. Several groups that appeared before Boyd's process of reviewing the Arbitration Act say it's not Shariah law they want to set up but a Muslim Personal/Family Law process which has its roots in Shariah.

The arbitration process as set out in the Arbitration Act is voluntary. Most of the concerns about the creation of "Shariah" tribunals have focused on the fear that Muslim women may feel they are being forced into taking part in a process of binding arbitration according to Muslim family law instead of resolving their disputes through the court system.

In her report, former Ontario attorney general Marion Boyd stressed that any faith-based system would have to conform to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

CBC News Indepth: Islam

 

[DaSleeper]

Wow, those are some ugly Muslims... about the source of Colpy's referenced photo:

“Creeping Sharia” is a phenomenon scourge occurring across the free world. We’ll define it as “the slow, deliberate, and methodical advance of Islamic law (sharia) in non-Muslim countries” (literal definitions below). Another frequently used term is ‘stealth jihad’.

About « Creeping Sharia

Muslim hate sites are bad for your brain. Their warped hate agenda is to manipulate people into becoming intolerant bigots.
.

Are you infering that the photo is not real???
You continualy give the label of hate site to any site that does not follow your standard of political correctness and shows things the way they realy are.
To meet your acceptance, we should all be quoting al jazeera, and reading articles posted by appologists:roll:

 

[petros]

...In 1991, Ontario was looking for ways to ease the burdens of a
backlogged court system. So the province changed its Arbitration Act to allow
"faith-based arbitration" – a system where Muslims, Jews, Catholics and members
of other faiths could use the guiding principles of their religions to settle
family disputes such as divorce, custody and inheritances outside the court
system.


It's voluntary – both parties (a husband and wife) have to agree to go
through the process. But once they do, the decisions rendered by the tribunal
are binding.


The Ontario government has been reviewing its Arbitration Act and on Dec.
20, 2004, it released a report conducted by former attorney general Marion Boyd.
Among her 46 recommendations was that:

The Arbitration Act should continue to allow disputes to be arbitrated using religious law, if the safeguards currently prescribed and recommended by this review are observed.

Sounds just like sentencing circles or alternative measures programs currently running.

When does Calgary go Sharia with it's Muzzie mayor?

 

[earth_as_one]

Are you infering that the photo is not real???
You continualy give the label of hate site to any site that does not follow your standard of political correctness and shows things the way they realy are.
To meet your acceptance, we should all be quoting al jazeera, and reading articles posted by appologists:roll:

Of course its real.

So is this image of God Fearing Christians:

But the above picture represents mainstream Christianity about as accurately as Colpy's picture from an Islamophobic hate site represents mainstream Islam.

Referencing this anti-Christian site, apparently this Christian couple beat their children to death because they mispronounced certain words:
http://www.secularnewsdaily.com/201...-beat-child-to-death-for-mispronouncing-word/

But I wouldn't claim that these "Christians" are "mainstream" or typical. Most Christians are against beating children to death for pronunciation errors. But if these whack jobs were Muslims, I'm sure their actions would be all the rage on the Islamophobic hate sites.

I suspect that the Creeping Sharia website that Colpy referenced has an agenda to demonize Islam and Muslims rather than portray the religion or its followers accurately.

Every religion has moderates and extremists. Portraying extreme religious viewpoints as mainstream is manipulative BS. Devout Muslims aren't that different from devout Christians.

 

[petros]

Other Religions have forced their laws on us for years. When Heebs had the Lord's Prayer eliminated from schools and anything upfront Christian in Govt did anyone here get their sh*t in a knot?

 

[Colpy]

Wow, those are some ugly Muslims... about the source of Colpy's referenced photo:

“Creeping Sharia” is a phenomenon scourge occurring across the free world. We’ll define it as “the slow, deliberate, and methodical advance of Islamic law (sharia) in non-Muslim countries” (literal definitions below). Another frequently used term is ‘stealth jihad’.

About « Creeping Sharia

Muslim hate sites are bad for your brain. Their warped hate agenda is to manipulate people into becoming intolerant bigots.

Stop Islamophobia Week - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Most people obey Canada's laws. However many do not.

Anyone can lobby our leaders to change the law... Since moderates will always outnumber extremists, I doubt extremists will ever gain enough support to pass extreme laws. Yet another strength which comes from Canada's diversity.

Don't make me laugh.

Islamophobia.....

A diversion for the deluded.

There IS NO STRENGTH IN MULTICULTURALISM....it is cultural suicide.

A main reason the Canadian Charter is a piece of paper worthy only for use as arsewipe is its inclusion of multiculturalism.

Trudeau torpedoed a great nation....the Charter was his final kick at the decaying body.

 

[petros]

Trudeau torpedoed a great nation....the Charter was his final kick at the decaying body.

Was Borden a good Prime Minister? Would the ideals of his cabinet fly in today's world?

 

[Nuggler]

Was Borden a good Prime Minister? Would the ideals of his cabinet fly in today's world?

Borden's Cons were trounced 3 -4 ? times by the Libs, who eventually did themselves in.(sound familiar)? It's an interesting read. His lack of charisma was responsible to a large degree for his govt's failure.

Ideals............hoonose?

We learned mostly US history in school, eh !! It was more exciting what with shooting everyone, killin Mexicans. Defendin the Alamo and etc.

Canadian history certainly is cyclical; but I'd have to do some reading afore commenting on the "ideals of Borden's cabinet"...........as you knew before you asked the question, y'ol trickster.;-)

 

[petros]

Canadian history certainly is cyclical; but I'd have to do some reading afore commenting on the "ideals of Borden's cabinet"...........as you knew before you asked the question, y'ol trickster.;-)

No trickery at all. The real trickery is in hiding real Canadian history.

Borden's gang were complete and total racist/cultural/Religious pigs.

How the Hell did such a pig get immortalized on the $100 bill?

It's an insult to Canadians.

 

[DaSleeper]

Slay.....Behead.....butcher those who mock Islam....Demolition/Extermination on it's way.......................

Compared with God will do this or that......
Only a Dhimmwit wouldn't see the difference:roll:

 

[CDNBear]

Discriminating against people because of their race or religion is illegal in Canada.

You just spent the better part of this thread telling us how you're OK with 2/3 of the people discriminating against those not of their faith.

I am against anyone interfering in the right of people to choose.

You just spent the better part of this thread telling us how you're OK with 2/3 of the people interfering with the right of people to choose.

 

[DaSleeper]

You just spent the better part of this thread telling us how you're OK with 2/3 of the people discriminating against those not of their faith.

You just spent the better part of this thread telling us how you're OK with 2/3 of the people interfering with the right of people to choose.

Yep... according to him, if two thirds of a neighbourhood are against drinking on the street...it's OK...you can go to a neighbourhood where it's allowed...
It's OK to discriminate but not against muslims and even more than two thirds can't keep a mosque from being built.........no way
<Thread bookmarked>

 

[earth_as_one]

Slay.....Behead.....butcher those who mock Islam....Demolition/Extermination on it's way.......................

Compared with God will do this or that......
Only a Dhimmwit wouldn't see the difference:roll:

You mean like this?

US 'Christian militants' charged after FBI raids

Hutaree's logo includes the initials CCR - for "Colonial Christian Republic"

Nine alleged members of a radical US Christian militia group have been charged with conspiring to kill police officers and wage war against the US.
The suspects were detained in a series of FBI raids across the Mid-West, while one remains at large.
Prosecutors say the eight men and one woman belonged to the Hutaree group.
It is alleged they planned to kill a police officer in Michigan and then stage a second attack on the funeral, using landmines and roadside bombs. ...


BBC News - US 'Christian militants' charged after FBI raids

I can find many examples of Christians interpreting "I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" (Gospel of Matthew 10:34), literally.

Yep... according to him, if two thirds of a neighbourhood are against drinking on the street...it's OK...you can go to a neighbourhood where it's allowed...
It's OK to discriminate but not against muslims and even more than two thirds can't keep a mosque from being built.........no way
<Thread bookmarked>

I'd also support religion free communities... As well as green zones for cannabis cafes and red zones for brothels.

 

[CDNBear]

Ya, that would be more like it, but it's still just a lame use of the moral equivalence fallacy.

As for your edit, your fixation with apartheid is troubling.

Maybe you should rethink your outrage about supposed Israeli apartheid, since you obviously love apartheid so much.

 

[earth_as_one]

More accurately, its the "portraying the most extreme example as representative of the main stream" fallacy. The technique can be used to demonize any identifiable group.

 

[CDNBear]

More accurately, its the "portraying the most extreme example as main stream" fallacy. The technique can be used to demonize any identifiable group.

I know, you use it to demonize Israel all the time.