Its not rocket science. Make them all illegal to start with. Jail those who possess. Oh by the way, there was a shooting in an alabama hospital today, wounding 3. Yes, guns are great aren't they? Pro gunners are idiots and the yanks are at the top of the list.
Well, congrats on taking up the challenge, at least.
But now actually think about what you propose.
It would require creating a prison state.........and the suspension of the entire constitution to search, try offenders and collect weapons. And there would be (quite rightly) extensive resistance.
270 million guns. An armed people can never be oppressed. Your plan would require a war by the American government on its own people, who are quite well equipped to fight it.
Civil war.
How many children would die in that??
625,000 people died in the last one, and that was 150 years ago.
The idea is quite simply, idiotic.
Why pretend the 2nd amendment is gone? That's not really a rational discussion to have, as that right is not realistically going to be overturned anytime in the near to medium future. There are plenty of reasonable things which can be discussed based on the merits without inventing unrealistic scenarios.
- Remove the gun show loop hole for background checks.
- Re-instate the restrictions on high capacity magazines and weapons of war.
- Other conditions for purchasing, such as proof of competency, which could include evaluations of mental fitness by range instructors.
- Since the majority of mass shootings occur in public places, and gun enthusiasts like Colpy would like to see armed people, how about a tax on ammo sales that must be spent on hiring security/law enforcement in public places.
That's off the top of my head, but I'm sure that there are many other options out there. I guess a corollary needs to be addressed as well. The types of things I listed above may make it more difficult for the mass shootings to take place, as it means time, effort, and skills training are all part of the process for purchasing a gun. But the vast majority of gun related deaths aren't mass shootings. So that may be a whole other topic that needs to be addressed, and not necessarily with the same actions.
1. Okay, but remember the guns used in the Connecticut shooting were registered, and the owner background checked. We need things that actually work....
2. Those are exactly the weapons protected by the second amendment.
3. Actually, that almost makes sense. I have always seen licensing as the best solution....but the guns in Connecticut were held by a licensed shooter.
4. HUGELY expensive....why not ENCOURAGE people to become trained on their own, paid for by themselves, qualify and background check them, and let them carry anywhere? I'd do it....although I already have all the qualifications.