Why does God hate babies who have not sinned?

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
IMO, there is no god to even have the human emotion of hatred. Even if there is such a thing as this loving, all-powerful god, it neither shows love (definitely shows indifference) nor does it seem able to fix the issue it started in the first place. And no-one has provided any evidence otherwise. Simply relying on faith is not evidence, nor is it very wise.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
That's like arguing that "'Do what seems right to you" covers everything. It does in a sense, but it has no real content as a guide to thought and action. Jesus is not recorded as speaking out against slavery, though we all now recognize it as wrong, so we can't know what he thought about it. Abolition movements didn't begin until the 18th century, prior to that, back to Jesus' times and well beyond into Old Testament times and longer, probably predating writing, slavery was an accepted part of many economic systems. You can't expect anyone to accept the claim that Jesus' teachings that WERE recorded contain a message against slavery but nobody noticed for over 1700 years. Post facto rationalizations don't cut it. You cannot derive the idea that slavery is a bad thing from reading the Christian scriptures, that's a later idea from humanist and secular philosophy.

OK- Where did your moral values come from- Your parents I would assume had some impact- Your family elders possible- -
What are your values based upon.
 

Eutaphodia

New Member
Jan 31, 2010
33
0
6
Grandville
There are many Gods worshipped on this planet earth!! Some religions are kept secret only to protect abuse of power and to respect their divinity. No matter what the religion or God, all beliefs come down to one principal - the spirit and how this spiritual energy exists in all there is - good and bad, empty space and time, light and darkness, all that there is. BEFORE GOD (S) WAS SPIRIT. GOD(S) DID NOT MAKE SPIRIT. GOD CANNOT EXIST WITHOUT SPIRIT. SPIRIT CAN EXIST WITHOUT GOD......GOD(S) COME AND GO WITH THE EONS OF TIME BUT SPIRIT ALWAYS REMAINS.

Life on earth (and religion) can throw us off our path as to why we exist. We deviate away from who we really are - Spirit - albeit in human form at this time. All that manifests comes from Spirit. We manifest who we are. We manifest our existance.

Do not confuse religion with that of God, and with that of Spirit. Some of use prefer to belive in a God so we do not have to be responsible for the hardships and evil in the world. God becomes the great scape goat in human history.

Your soul (which is NOT your spirit) is the place where you imprint all that you believe and experience within life. Your soul is your spiritual autobiography of what you create from Spirit.

Your soul resides in your heart.
Your spirit resides in your brain.
When you die, your spirit and soul return back into the GREAT SPIRIT OF ALL THAT THERE IS. From there your soul is examined by you - your spirit.

Here is a link explaining spirit in a scientific manner and not on a religious level.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvKP0SERi6c1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-u-E89Q9jk 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KFqqIV8BY83

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwhQywupaIw meditation to bridge physical plane with our spiritual self
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
halleluyah!
I got a pic of my spirits;
 

karrie

OogedyBoogedy
Jan 6, 2007
27,780
285
83
bliss




The God I know is not a tyrant but yes, I am quite fundamental in my beliefs. Apotheosis will cause that and so will good clear thinking.

We are all fundamental in our belief systems.

If your belief system is so soft that it will be changed without effort then you are not much of a person.

I come on strong because I assume the other is strong. If they cannot take the heat then they should not get near my fire.

Do you show your strength or your weakness when coming to a debate forum?


Regards
DL




Do I show my strength or my weakness? Hmm... I'd like to think I show my humanity, my flexibility. I chat, I give opinions, I absord opinions, I learn, I grow. I do so thoughtful of what I believe about the world, what kind of person I am, and how I want the world to both treat and see me. So when someone comes in giving bizarre statements about other religions, and casting judgement on others, I can't help but ask questions, and attempt to find out what makes that person take that tact, what gives them that sense of moral and intellectual superiority.

 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Do I show my strength or my weakness? Hmm... I'd like to think I show my humanity, my flexibility. I chat, I give opinions, I absord opinions, I learn, I grow. I do so thoughtful of what I believe about the world, what kind of person I am, and how I want the world to both treat and see me. So when someone comes in giving bizarre statements about other religions, and casting judgement on others, I can't help but ask questions, and attempt to find out what makes that person take that tact, what gives them that sense of moral and intellectual superiority.

[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]

Reason why you are an Angel

 

Dexter Sinister

Unspecified Specialist
Oct 1, 2004
10,168
539
113
Regina, SK
OK- Where did your moral values come from- Your parents I would assume had some impact- Your family elders possible- -
What are your values based upon.
They come from the same place yours did, the same place everybody's do. First I would argue that conscience is innate and its source is the basic recognition of the need for cooperation. There are genetically determined behaviours that cross all cultures and societies, and sociability is one of them, we are not infinitely malleable, nor are we blank slates. Normal humans respond with similar feelings to similar events, and our morals are rooted in our common emotional responses. We all share the same basic survival and growth needs, we have common problems and pleasures, we easily identify with each other and share goals and interests, our ethics are the result of social processes that are constantly evolving, and slavery is a good example. It used to be an accepted institution in many cultures, now it isn't.

Second, I would argue that there is no good or evil in the absence of thinking creatures with needs. What the lion does to the zebra has no ethical or moral content, a person doing it to another does, and not necessarily a negative one. There have been cultures in which consuming parts of one's foes had a high moral purpose, and cultures in which boiling and shrinking the heads of dead relatives and hanging them up around the hut was viewed as a good thing to do. What's good and what's evil are defined by us, for us. I don't think any further explanation is necessary for why people pursue human interests and relate laws and institutions and ethics to human concerns. What needs explanation is the claim that there's a higher law and a lawgiver external to us, that to me seems to be the end of cooperation and the beginning of coercion. And then you have to ask, where does that lawgiver get its ethics and values, which leads to an infinite regress and where it stops is completely arbitrary, it doesn't solve the problem it sets out to solve.
 

1an

New Member
Apr 30, 2012
48
0
6
Sheffield, UK
Respect grows.

The more progressive churches have dropped that idiocy but many others have not.

Regards
DL



Sense is far from anything I see in scripture if read the way literalists and fundamentals do but it does hold a fair bit of wisdom if you read it the way Gnostic Christians read it.

After all, it is a consolidation of much of the older wisdom sayings from older religions.

God does hate babies in the womb though according to scriptures.

Romans 9:11-13

King James Version (KJV)
11 (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth;)
12 It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger.
13 As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated.

Regards
DL


That must be one of the most misunderstood verses in the Bible. It is about two nations that were not yet born, Jesus is descended from Jacob and Mohamed is descended from Esau from which came two great nations that broadly speaking are the Western world and the Arab states. It is talking about children not yet born i.e. future generations and we see it working out today.





Why does God hate babies whohave not sinned?

Scriptures indicate that Godknows that babies in the womb have not done anything good or evil. They alsoindicate that God hates some babies even while in the womb and innocent. It isalso said that God creates us and our characters. Our characters, as we evolve,cannot help but do evil. God then is responsible for the evil that we will doas he has created our natures. Natures that we cannot help but follow.

We can blame our free willand the choices we make for the evil that we do but this does not explain whyour God created natures decide to do evil. Theistic evolutionists try toexplain this paradox but the average literalist or fundamental Christian doesnot follow their reasoning.

We have no choice and no freewill to deviate from our God given sin nature and God would know this as it is wasall planned. Jesus was to die even beforeman was created. That is why Adam’s sin is called a necessary sin.

If we have no choice infollowing our sin natures, and cannot deviate from our part in God’s plan, thenwhat is God’s reason for punishing us for being exactly what he created andprogrammed us to do?

That is why Adam’s sin iscalled a necessary sin. He could not help but sin and neither can any of us.You cannot help but do evil and thus sin.

This is all rather abstractso if you like I will imagine a viable scenario for us to work with. We allknow that many are starving to death in various countries. Imagine one of thesestarving children walking past a farmer’s apple tree. The child knows that ifhe steals the apples that the farmer’s family will starve to death. He or shehas a choice of either stealing apples to prevent their death or not. Thesurvival instinct being our first instinct, I think apples will be eaten.

That child’s God given naturewill choose life, as all natures do by default, and eat an apple. Does thatchild deserve hell when it’s God given nature drove it to sin?

We cannot do anything butfollow our basic God given natures. Do we deserve hell for doing so?

Is God’s punishment unjust?

If sin was required for Jesusto manifest, Adam had to sin. Would his punishment and death have also beenunjust?

Did God, knowing Adam wouldbe a sinner and cause God’s/Jesus’ death, hate Adam as well when he wascreating him?

Regards
DL

This clip explains theisticevolution and how you cannot help but do evil and sin.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ProfMTH#g/c/6F8036F680C1DBEB
Hi DL. It is sin and wrong doing that God hates and if you can show me a baby that has lied, stolen, murdered, committed adultery and a few other things then fair enough. But when it eats of the tree of knowledge like Adam and Eve it is no longer innocent and like Adam and Eve it is condemned by It's own disobedience. Fortunately there is a remedy to those who believe as you already know.

I think you're misreading the Christian doctrine of original sin, which is essentially that we all bear the burden of Adam and Eve's disobedience to god; no matter how blameless we may be personally the stain is still there. You're right to challenge it, but I doubt any Christian theologian would agree with your conclusion that god hates babies. I would conclude from the Old Testament that he hates everybody, though he seems to have had some good anger management training before showing up in the New Testament. But he doesn't actually show up as a dominant character in the NT the way he does in the OT, in the OT he speaks for himself, in the NT people speak for him. But if you expect the whole story as recorded in scripture to make consistent sense, you will be disappointed.


Hi DS. Sin came into the world though Adam and Eve but we are only judged on our own wrong doing, not what Adam and Eve did or our ancestors and neither will we be punished for the likes of Hitler and Stalin. :smile:
[/FONT]

What is in the Bible has been re written dozens of time to fit the moral and political views
of those entrusted with the document. This also holds true for most of the great religious
books. Religion is not about a spiritual journey its about the ongoing political view of the
world.
Back in the time of Christ Rome was a vast right wing fascist state and Jesus spoke against
it. Now the Conservatives have control of the Christian movement and have had since
Constantine governed Rome. Christ would even recognize the movement he started if he
came back today.
You are buying into the traditions and politics instead of the meaning of the religion itself.
And screaming against the Bible nets little in a rising profile for thousands of others have
taken the road before you and there is no answer to the questions asked.

If the Old Testament had been re-written Christians many of whom were Jews would know about it and likewise if the New Testament was rewritten Jews would know about it. Nobody has accused anyone of such a thing.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
In the seventh chapter of Romans St. Paul speaks in such clear fashion of theological sin and death as to leave no room for argument as to what he connotes by his use of the terms thus so closely linked. By incarnation we came under the Law, begins the Apostle. Under the Law we developed sin, which was our violation of law while we were yet ignorant children (as expounded further in Galatians iv.) Then by sin came death. The whole sequence is the "cycle of necessity", as Greek philosophy called it, or the periodical descent of soul into the lower worlds for its cycles of experience, which bring it "under the law", give it the consciousness of good and evil, or the sense of "sin", and subject it to a bondage to the flesh. As pre-human animals we lived without Law, says Paul. Hear his words: "I lived at one time without Law myself, but when

19​
the command came home to me, sin sprang to life, and I died; the command that meant life proved death to me. The command gave an impulse to sin, sin beguiled me and used the command to kill me. . . . Sin resulted in death for me by making use of this good thing. The interests of the flesh meant death. . . ." Here are words of unmistakable meaning: the command that meant life to us proved to be, theologically, our death. Had scholar’s known Paul’s background of Greek philosophy, they would have known that he was discoursing on death as the incarnation of the soul in mortal body. The Lost Meaning of Death A B Kuhn

DB Sin is life in the flesh. DB from the perspective of souls who knew it knot
 

china

Time Out
Jul 30, 2006
5,247
37
48
74
Ottawa ,Canada

Why does God hate babies whohave not sinned?

Scriptures indicate that Godknows that babies in the womb have not done anything good or evil. They alsoindicate that God hates some babies even while in the womb and innocent. It isalso said that God creates us and our characters. Our characters, as we evolve,cannot help but do evil. God then is responsible for the evil that we will doas he has created our natures. Natures that we cannot help but follow.

We can blame our free willand the choices we make for the evil that we do but this does not explain whyour God created natures decide to do evil. Theistic evolutionists try toexplain this paradox but the average literalist or fundamental Christian doesnot follow their reasoning.

We have no choice and no freewill to deviate from our God given sin nature and God would know this as it is wasall planned. Jesus was to die even beforeman was created. That is why Adam’s sin is called a necessary sin.

If we have no choice infollowing our sin natures, and cannot deviate from our part in God’s plan, thenwhat is God’s reason for punishing us for being exactly what he created andprogrammed us to do?

That is why Adam’s sin iscalled a necessary sin. He could not help but sin and neither can any of us.You cannot help but do evil and thus sin.

This is all rather abstractso if you like I will imagine a viable scenario for us to work with. We allknow that many are starving to death in various countries. Imagine one of thesestarving children walking past a farmer’s apple tree. The child knows that ifhe steals the apples that the farmer’s family will starve to death. He or shehas a choice of either stealing apples to prevent their death or not. Thesurvival instinct being our first instinct, I think apples will be eaten.

That child’s God given naturewill choose life, as all natures do by default, and eat an apple. Does thatchild deserve hell when it’s God given nature drove it to sin?

We cannot do anything butfollow our basic God given natures. Do we deserve hell for doing so?

Is God’s punishment unjust?

If sin was required for Jesusto manifest, Adam had to sin. Would his punishment and death have also beenunjust?

Did God, knowing Adam wouldbe a sinner and cause God’s/Jesus’ death, hate Adam as well when he wascreating him?

Regards
DL

This clip explains theisticevolution and how you cannot help but do evil and sin.

http://www.youtube.com/user/ProfMTH#g/c/6F8036F680C1DBEB
Everyone is talking about God . God this ....God that .Who ,what the hell is God .Can anyone explain ....please >
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Somewhere back here its suggested French Patriot that you and I would not be at odds
regarding religion. I said the conservatives took over Christianity from the one who did
most of the work to keep it alive. That means Rome before Constantine was a vast right
wing fascist state. Yes conservatives have taken over it does not mean religion has now
become evil it just means the conservatives have difficulty reconciling their positions
from that which Christ taught. His teachings if you read them were actually a mixture of
left and right. Its the apostles that defined these positions after his death.
We now have four versions of the Bible New Testament. This quite frankly was done to
ensure the Church survived as the four main figures fought for control of the church.
There are according to some nearly two dozen Gospels ones like Timothy which were
farther to the left in viewpoint. Others of course would balance this. They are apparently
locked in the Vatican.
This means the church turned from faith to politics. Constantine used the new faith to save
Rome the instant conversion thing. In the twelfth century it changed again as Pope Gregory
Sold shares into Heaven for donations to Build the present Papal Structures in Rome.
We have King James version and others along the way and my question is what ever really
happened to Jesus version that has somehow been written over.
You some how want to make every passage a thing of evil and I believe people will fear what
they don't understand and fear leads to misconceptions, sometimes hate and God knows what
else. You know where to find the words to condemn but somehow you lack the understanding
of the words. No I don't think we would have too much in common and I am not all that religious.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.

How many dozens of times have I seen that question? God doesn't work that way. The world was pretty well set up to run perfectly, with systems in place to balance things off as they get out of whack. God doesn't concern himself with the individual but rather with trends. As long as you don't buck established trends you are probably fairly safe, but nothing is for certain because we can't predict what other members of the human race are going to do.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Why does God hate babies who have not sinned?

How does getting a new name put in the book of life qualify as 'hate'. People aren't supposed to die until just before 120 if wisdom is supposed to part of their maturity level. God only judges sin in people between 20 and 120 years of age, older, like Moses will be when he also comes back is after being judged by God to not be in sin and therefore can pass into the immortal being stage of eternity, old man is only a title it is not about the condition of the body.

Scriptures indicate that Godknows that babies in the womb have not done anything good or evil. They alsoindicate that God hates some babies even while in the womb and innocent. It isalso said that God creates us and our characters. Our characters, as we evolve,cannot help but do evil. God then is responsible for the evil that we will doas he has created our natures. Natures that we cannot help but follow.

Since they cannot be judged as being 'without sin' they should be granted eternal life, .... you live, you die and God isn't involved until until the direction is reversed. Birth is on an individual level, judgment is an all or nothing kind of event. The dating in Isa:65 is for the new earth but since babies are born as eternal beings rather than fully immortal they go through a 'testing stage because they are under the Re:21 law. 0 -20 years in infant, on the 20th birthday a change in titles happens as the infant 'dies' and a 'child' is born. The next 100 years is spent as matured adults (married and the 100 children they have is beside the point for this post) at 120 there is another title change where god is the judge and a person is either a sinner or not and if they are it is to the fiery lake rather than just to the grave and wait to be under 120 and having paid for all your sins in the flesh. (in the time people live that long God is there to make sure every child become an 'old-man' for eternity.

We can blame our free willand the choices we make for the evil that we do but this does not explain whyour God created natures decide to do evil. Theistic evolutionists try toexplain this paradox but the average literalist or fundamental Christian doesnot follow their reasoning.

Make the free will choice to never sin and never die. Since there are none around that have done that and are alive it doesn't seem to be working out all that well for them, so far or nobody ever thought of doing it and you can be the first. Really think you want to see 900 years of the same stuff you see in just 90 years?
Pleasure or punishment?

We have no choice and no freewill to deviate from our God given sin nature and God would know this as it is wasall planned.Jesus was to die even beforeman was created. That is why Adam’s sin is called a necessary sin.

One time, the last ones to be resurrected get to accept or reject the offer of a drink of the water in Re:21. That choice would over-ride any other options that could ever be available to you. That is also in Isa:65.

If we have no choice infollowing our sin natures, and cannot deviate from our part in God’s plan, thenwhat is God’s reason for punishing us for being exactly what he created andprogrammed us to do?

That is why everybody goes to the grave, that is also a cleansing agent as well as the destiny for sinners. Grave is the salvation plan for those not yet in the grave when the return happens.

That is why Adam’s sin iscalled a necessary sin. He could not help but sin and neither can any of us.You cannot help but do evil and thus sin.


Adam ate because he could not let Eve experience death on her own. She fell to temptation, Adam would have questioned the lie.

This is all rather abstractso if you like I will imagine a viable scenario for us to work with. We allknow that many are starving to death in various countries. Imagine one of thesestarving children walking past a farmer’s apple tree. The child knows that ifhe steals the apples that the farmer’s family will starve to death. He or shehas a choice of either stealing apples to prevent their death or not. Thesurvival instinct being our first instinct, I think apples will be eaten.

God left His instructions in printed form just so people would not be able to say there no clear instructions and the verses in question were cryptic in nature and could not be understood. The ones that die such death will be resurrected before the ones that could have prevented it.
The ones called blessed will be alive for the 1,000 years, the ones making people part of the blessed group are sent to the back of the line that leads to the door called 'saved'.

That child’s God given naturewill choose life, as all natures do by default, and eat an apple. Does thatchild deserve hell when it’s God given nature drove it to sin?

Whatever, is that in agreement with water and fish from this earth being part of the new earth count as 'caring', if that comes as a new theory how caring are we?

We cannot do anything butfollow our basic God given natures. Do we deserve hell for doing so?

What would expect to happen when you raise your hand in anger against God? OT rules had a person lose their hands. Jesus sends them for a 1,000 year 'time-out' that is shorter than 1 day to Him, any shorter it would be a reward and nuff said.

Is God’s punishment unjust?

If there was no end then yes, if it is a teaching process and the end results in a better relationship with the one making all the rules then the question doesn't even need to be asked.

If sin was required for Jesusto manifest, Adam had to sin. Would his punishment and death have also beenunjust?

Sending some to daeth made it so thhat GHod had to send somebody there to be able to retrieve them, open the door to the land of the living which is where you would expect to find the God of the living. The beloved disciple is from that group so might as well bring all her relatives along for the ride that starts in Re:22

Did God, knowing Adam wouldbe a sinner and cause God’s/Jesus’ death, hate Adam as well when he wascreating him?
God killed something in the garden in order to hand-sew them some clothes to help them in the place they were going, how much raging anger was that, say on a scale of 50?
 
Last edited:

French Patriot

Council Member
Sep 17, 2012
2,006
30
48
I agree with the poet, only a fool
would ever believe that they have "the exact truth from God." Our human minds
are so small, we can not comprehend all that God is. We can only handle tiny
bits of information, and the smallest portions of the truth.

I like your first. Your last is garbage and self-deprecating garbage and a form of self-aggrandizement FMPOV.
You will not get pity or praise from me.
However, rejecting God, and attempting to make everything
religious a joke is not the answer either.

As a religionist, I agree. That is why I take the Godhead I know seriously and am here to promote seeking God. Just not the genocidal son murderer that Christians love. He is a prick and should be called so.
It is your condescending attitude, and you utter
failure to even begin to understand religious belief, that you should keep to
yourself.

I understand religious belief as well as most and if I kept to myself then evil would grow so shove your immoral advice.
For evil to grow, all good people need do is nothing. Interesting that you advise to do nothing.

instead, you try to make up your own religion of non-belief, and
force it down the throats of those that simply do not accept your
"thoughts".



You have not been paying attention. I preach seeking God and suggest that all Gods be seen as myths until one is unlucky enough to find the Godhead.

Please, go contemplate this on your own time. I do not
attempt to shove MY religious beliefs on you, so please return the
favor.


[/FONT][/FONT]




Your religion does harm. Mine does not. Mine makes moral sense while yours does not. That is why you do not try to shove your garbage dogma.

Regards
DL


I have basically asked him one question. To define what "he" thinks a gnostic Christian is. He has, so far, ignored that request.

I must have missed that request so let me try to correct that omission.In a word. A gostic Christian FMPOV is a perpetual seaker and an esoteric ecuminist.

Let me give you my anecdotal rendering and we can go from there if you like.

The Godhead I know in a nutshell.

I was a skeptic till the age of 39.

I then had an apotheosis and later branded myself a Gnostic Christiannaturalist.

Gnostic Christian because I exemplify this quote from William Blake.

“Both read the Bible day andnight, But thou read'st black where I read white.”

This refers to how Gnostics tend to reverse, for moral reasons, whatChristians see in the Bible. We tend to recognize the evil ways of O T Godwhere literal Christians will see God’s killing as good.Christians are sheeple where Gnostic Christians are goats.

This is perhaps why we see the use of a Jesus scapegoat as immoral,while theists like to make Jesus their beast of burden. An immoral position.

During my apotheosis, something that only lasted 5 or 6 seconds, theonly things of note to happen was that my paradigm of reality was confirmed andI was chastised to think more demographically. What I found was what I call acosmic consciousness. Not a new term but one that is a close but not exact fit.

I recognize that I have no proof. That is always the way withapotheosis.

This is also why I prefer to stick to issues of morality because no onehas yet been able to prove that God is real and I have no more proof than theyfor the cosmic consciousness.

The cosmic consciousness is not a miracle working God. He does notinterfere with us save when one of us finds it. Not a common thing from what Ican see. It is a part of nature and our next evolutionary step.

I tend to have more in common with atheists who ignore what they see asmy delusion because our morals are basically identical. Theist tend not to likeme much as I have no respect for literalists and fundamentals and think thatmost Christians have tribal mentalities and poor morals.

I am rather between a rock and a hard place but this I cannot help.

I am happy to be questioned on what I believe but whether or not Godexists is basically irrelevant to this world for all that he does not do, and Iprefer to thrash out moral issues that can actually find an end point. Thesearch for God is never ending when you are of the Gnostic persuasion. Myapotheosis basically says that I am to discard whatever God I found, God as aset of rules that is, not idol worship it but instead, raise my bar and seekfurther.

My apotheosis also showed me that God has no need for love, adoration orobedience. He has no needs. Man has dominion here on earth and is to be and isthe supreme being.

Regards
DL

That is like asking him to write a book and post it on here. The Gnostic Gospels are supposedly from the other 8 apostles and their followers and are much more geared toward the personal spiritual journey toward the truth than following any dogmatic religious path.

"Faith is learning how to recognize the truth where ever you might find it." - Allan Watts.

Although, it sounds like he may have chosen a dogmatic gnostic path.

Ouch. I would not say dogmatic.
I would say that I am fundamental in my beliefs though and will hold them till they can be refuted as they are based on facts and reality as I see it.

I have an open mind but do not let garbage in.

Regards
DL

Do I show my strength or my weakness? Hmm... I'd like to think I show my humanity, my flexibility. I chat, I give opinions, I absord opinions, I learn, I grow. I do so thoughtful of what I believe about the world, what kind of person I am, and how I want the world to both treat and see me. So when someone comes in giving bizarre statements about other religions, and casting judgement on others, I can't help but ask questions, and attempt to find out what makes that person take that tact, what gives them that sense of moral and intellectual superiority.

[/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT][/FONT]

IOW. You show your strength of character.
As it should be.

I hope I show moral superiority, and back it up properly, but do not think I am intellectually superior to anyone. You would, I hope, be surprised at the lack of formal education I am working with.

Regards
DL