Then you haven't been watching.........
Mark Steyn and Macleans hauled before a kangaroo court for publishing an article on demographics.
Ezra Levant hauled before a kangaroo court for publishing news in a newspaper.
I get tired of people that think only approved speech should be allowed....of course they get to define "approved".
Why is burning a Koran hate-speech??? Any more than burning say....a Dick and Jane reader??
And would you like to live in a society where the latter was banned??
Why is the moronic film
Innocence of whomever any more hate speech than
The Last Temptation of Christ??
And would you like to live in a society where the latter was banned??
Why is a cartoon of the 'Prophet" any more hate speech than the Piss Christ?
And would you like to live in a society where the latter was banned??
Mohammed was a war monger, a pedophile, a rapist, and a murderer.
Is that hate speech?? It is true......
The
hadith celebrates the genocidal murder of all Jews in the End Days.
Is that hate speech??
Or is my pointing it out hate speech???
The idea that inciting an emotion should be illegal is a very dangerous concept, bordering on thought crime.
Yep.
It shouldn't........
Canada doesn't have kangaroo courts. I find the term is used most often when a court makes a ruling that someone happens to disagree with. And none of your other objections are valid. We are not talking about valid historical or societal truths. We are talking about an American bigot who has gone out of his way to stir up racial hatred using deliberate lies. This is a clear abuse of freedom of speech just as Hitler's and Goebbels' hate-filled diatribes in the 1920s and 30s were hate speech. Or are you about to justify the murder of millions of Jews, socialists, homosexuals, and anyone else the Nazis didn't like?
Freedom of speech is a fine ideal, but as in all things there has to be a reasonable use of this right. When people abuse the rights they are given they don't deserve to have them.
So, Nope.
So, you're saying that Moslems in Canada don't deserve protection.
In which case, it's okay to burn that book.
Sad that you can't read. Where did I say that? Why don't you try arguing with facts instead of inuendo? You might be taken more seriously.