Presidential debate
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
WHAT!! LOL when Romney told Obama a quip about his five sons also repeating endlessly a line hoping he would believe it eventually, I laughed and then thought about CNDBear..
Excuse number 6....right behind (Not used to high altitude) and (He couldn't use a teleprompter)
Yes I would say Romney won the first session. That does not mean Romney will win
the election. In addition there are two more to go and I would be willing to bet the
President will make a comeback in round two. I see this as nonsense though, as most
voters have decided who they will vote for. The other thing I have noticed is that Mr
Romney has not capitalized on his performance with groups he needs to win over.
The nasty add battle will determine the winner. If you look at the States needed to win
Romney could win many and score well, but the ones Obama will win have the Electoral
College Votes and those are still in Obama's favour.
the election. In addition there are two more to go and I would be willing to bet the
President will make a comeback in round two. I see this as nonsense though, as most
voters have decided who they will vote for. The other thing I have noticed is that Mr
Romney has not capitalized on his performance with groups he needs to win over.
The nasty add battle will determine the winner. If you look at the States needed to win
Romney could win many and score well, but the ones Obama will win have the Electoral
College Votes and those are still in Obama's favour.
Here's the latest 2 excuses:
Team Obama blames John Kerry for Debate Loss
Left accuses Romney of 'cheating' to win debate
It was excuse 'used-by-Romneys-campaign' prior to the debate. Keep up.
No, he's terrible. He has no chance in the upcoming debates. Anything but a landslide debate win for Romney would be a shock.
How true. Mind you, the stupid people are the 100% of the ones running, and 75% of those voting.
Obama's Debate Notes
With a full language warning, open up this posting fully to read Obama's Debate Notes from last Wednesday. Yes, entirely contrived but darn funny!
small dead animals: Obama's Debate Notes
With a full language warning, open up this posting fully to read Obama's Debate Notes from last Wednesday. Yes, entirely contrived but darn funny!
small dead animals: Obama's Debate Notes
WHAT!! LOL when Romney told Obama a quip about his five sons also repeating endlessly a line hoping he would believe it eventually, I laughed and then thought about CNDBear..
I hope you notice my question mark as I was referring to another member's post.
It is kind of a good idea when going into a Presidential Debate.
‘Unfair’: Obama Supporters Explain Why Teleprompters Should Be Allowed During Debates
"Why? Why would you not let him use his teleprompter, you know?"
Watch them here: Obama Supporters Argue for Teleprompters in Presidential Debates After Romney Beats Obama | Video | TheBlaze.com
:lol:
"Why? Why would you not let him use his teleprompter, you know?"
Watch them here: Obama Supporters Argue for Teleprompters in Presidential Debates After Romney Beats Obama | Video | TheBlaze.com
:lol:
Good article.
Presidential debate: Denver was never Obama
Everybody says it’s a game changer. I’m talking about the Denver debate, of course. Is there any other topic this week?
Well, yes; in fact, there are quite a few, but let’s stick with Denver for the moment. I suppose the first U.S. presidential debate of 2012 was a game changer for those who thought the Republican candidate, Mitt Romney, wasn’t in the game. There were many such people, and not only among Barack Obama’s supporters. Nominating “Mitt” was like pulling teeth for many Republicans.
I always expected Romney to be in the game, so the debate wasn’t a game changer for me. What I never expected was for Romney to win, and I still don’t.
If Denver were to decide the election — that is, if nothing else occurred between now and voters going to the polls — I think Barack Obama would win by a nose. This isn’t good news for him, considering that before the debate he was leading Mitt Romney by a head, but it’s not yet fatal to his ambitions. Romney won the debate, all right, but (despite all the Reagan-Carter comparisons inundating the media overnight) not the presidency.
Presidential debate: Denver was never Obama
Everybody says it’s a game changer. I’m talking about the Denver debate, of course. Is there any other topic this week?
Well, yes; in fact, there are quite a few, but let’s stick with Denver for the moment. I suppose the first U.S. presidential debate of 2012 was a game changer for those who thought the Republican candidate, Mitt Romney, wasn’t in the game. There were many such people, and not only among Barack Obama’s supporters. Nominating “Mitt” was like pulling teeth for many Republicans.
I always expected Romney to be in the game, so the debate wasn’t a game changer for me. What I never expected was for Romney to win, and I still don’t.
If Denver were to decide the election — that is, if nothing else occurred between now and voters going to the polls — I think Barack Obama would win by a nose. This isn’t good news for him, considering that before the debate he was leading Mitt Romney by a head, but it’s not yet fatal to his ambitions. Romney won the debate, all right, but (despite all the Reagan-Carter comparisons inundating the media overnight) not the presidency.
I too, still think Obama will immerge successfully on Nov. 6, but hey if he doesn't it's not the end of the world. I think the Democrats have traditionally been supported by the city slickers, and the Republicans more by the denizens of the rural areas, which includes many of the lower income and a lot of the labour force in industries such as farming ranching etc. If that segment get their wishes it won't hurt my feelings either. The only problem I have with Romney is I don't trust him.