Trudeau can save the Liberals if people will vote for a party solely on the basis of a figurehead.
Given the absurd adoration and complete willingness to ignore any and all negative impacts of PET's tenure. I think it a fair chance that Justin could be the messiah the Liberals and like minded Trudeaumanics have been praying for.Trudeau can save the Liberals if people will vote for a party solely on the basis of a figurehead.
Given the absurd adoration and complete willingness to ignore any and all negative impacts of PET's tenure. I think it a fair chance that Justin could be the messiah the Liberals and like minded Trudeaumanics have been praying for.
Rex Murphy has it right - if Trudeau runs and wins, the Liberals will be accused of looking for a messiah, which they are.
The more interesting thing is how this thread has rapidly drifted from talking about a Trudeau to talking about someone else.
Trudeau can save the Liberals if people will vote for a party solely on the basis of a figurehead.
Given the absurd adoration and complete willingness to ignore any and all negative impacts of PET's tenure. I think it a fair chance that Justin could be the messiah the Liberals and like minded Trudeaumanics have been praying for.
And those who vote for a candidate just because they like their leader are idiots who really shouldn't be voting, though I'll grant that makes up a large percentage of Canadians on all sides of the political spectrum and that might be a big reason for so much mediocracy in our politics. That and people voting strategically for the second-worst candidate to keep the worst one out rather than vote on principle.
to be fair though, we should not blame Justin for Pierre's decisions.
Why? He's made comments that lead me to believe he is his fathers child.to be fair though, we should not blame Justin for Pierre's decisions.
And those who vote for a candidate just because they like their leader are idiots who really shouldn't be voting, though I'll grant that makes up a large percentage of Canadians on all sides of the political spectrum and that might be a big reason for so much mediocracy in our politics. .
Of which the election of 1968 was a direct result, not to mention the political mayhem to follow for 16 years! :lol:
A leader that can hold interest in a party togetherWhat are the qualifications for a "band aid" leader? :smile:
A leader that can hold interest in a party together
The problem is that the party seems to think he can just come in and save them. Trouble is, they will need deep restructuring to set themselves apart from the NDP and prepare for the 21st century, and, from what I see, they're not ready to do that.
Junior should bide his time until the Conservatives and the NDP have worn themselves out, just as the BC Liberals have done so, and then, with a decade's experience in, say, provincial politics, come in and save the day.
Speaking of Andrew Coyne (on another thread), he is suggesting the Liberals could form a real third party - if they can get the liberal (free-market) conservatives from Harper, along with the social liberals (libertarians). I would support such a party, because, while I am very pro-family in my life, I am not a social conservative.
This would, to me, be the real Conservative Party of the 21st Century.
Isn't it what Bob Rea is doing right now?A leader that can hold interest in a party together