Was Columbus secretly a Jew?

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Was Columbus secretly a Jew? - CNN.com

CNN) -- Today marks the 508th anniversary of the death of Christopher Columbus.

Everybody knows the story of Columbus, right? He was an Italian explorer from Genoa who set sail in 1492 to enrich the Spanish monarchs with gold and spices from the orient. Not quite.

For too long, scholars have ignored Columbus's grand passion: the quest to liberate Jerusalem from the Muslims.

During Columbus's lifetime, Jews became the target of fanatical religious persecution. On March 31, 1492, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella proclaimed that all Jews were to be expelled from Spain. The edict especially targeted the 800,000 Jews who had never converted, and gave them four months to pack up and get out.

The Jews who were forced to renounce Judaism and embrace Catholicism were known as "Conversos," or converts. There were also those who feigned conversion, practicing Catholicism outwardly while covertly practicing Judaism, the so-called "Marranos," or swine.

Tens of thousands of Marranos were tortured by the Spanish Inquisition. They were pressured to offer names of friends and family members, who were ultimately paraded in front of crowds, tied to stakes and burned alive. Their land and personal possessions were then divvied up by the church and crown.

Recently, a number of Spanish scholars, such as Jose Erugo, Celso Garcia de la Riega, Otero Sanchez and Nicholas Dias Perez, have concluded that Columbus was a Marrano, whose survival depended upon the suppression of all evidence of his Jewish background in face of the brutal, systematic ethnic cleansing.

Columbus, who was known in Spain as Cristóbal Colón and didn't speak Italian, signed his last will and testament on May 19, 1506, and made five curious -- and revealing -- provisions.

Two of his wishes -- tithe one-tenth of his income to the poor and provide an anonymous dowry for poor girls -- are part of Jewish customs. He also decreed to give money to a Jew who lived at the entrance of the Lisbon Jewish Quarter.

On those documents, Columbus used a triangular signature of dots and letters that resembled inscriptions found on gravestones of Jewish cemeteries in Spain. He ordered his heirs to use the signature in perpetuity.

According to British historian Cecil Roth's "The History of the Marranos," the anagram was a cryptic substitute for the Kaddish, a prayer recited in the synagogue by mourners after the death of a close relative. Thus, Columbus's subterfuge allowed his sons to say Kaddish for their crypto-Jewish father when he died. Finally, Columbus left money to support the crusade he hoped his successors would take up to liberate the Holy Land.

Estelle Irizarry, a linguistics professor at Georgetown University, has analyzed the language and syntax of hundreds of handwritten letters, diaries and documents of Columbus and concluded that the explorer's primary written and spoken language was Castilian Spanish. Irizarry explains that 15th-century Castilian Spanish was the "Yiddish" of Spanish Jewry, known as "Ladino." At the top left-hand corner of all but one of the 13 letters written by Columbus to his son Diego contained the handwritten Hebrew letters bet-hei, meaning b'ezrat Hashem (with God's help). Observant Jews have for centuries customarily added this blessing to their letters. No letters to outsiders bear this mark, and the one letter to Diego in which this was omitted was one meant for King Ferdinand.

In Simon Weisenthal's book, "Sails of Hope," he argues that Columbus's voyage was motivated by a desire to find a safe haven for the Jews in light of their expulsion from Spain. Likewise, Carol Delaney, a cultural anthropologist at Stanford University, concludes that Columbus was a deeply religious man whose purpose was to sail to Asia to obtain gold in order to finance a crusade to take back Jerusalem and rebuild the Jews' holy Temple.

In Columbus's day, Jews widely believed that Jerusalem had to be liberated and the Temple rebuilt for the Messiah to return.

Scholars point to the date on which Columbus set sail as further evidence of his true motives. He was originally going to sail on August 2, 1492, a day that happened to coincide with the Jewish holiday of Tisha B'Av, marking the destruction of the First and Second Holy Temples of Jerusalem. Columbus postponed this original sail date by one day to avoid embarking on the holiday, which would have been considered by Jews to be an unlucky day to set sail. (Coincidentally or significantly, the day he set forth was the very day that Jews were, by law, given the choice of converting, leaving Spain, or being killed.)

Columbus's voyage was not, as is commonly believed, funded by the deep pockets of Queen Isabella, but rather by two Jewish Conversos and another prominent Jew. Louis de Santangel and Gabriel Sanchez advanced an interest free loan of 17,000 ducats from their own pockets to help pay for the voyage, as did Don Isaac Abrabanel, rabbi and Jewish statesman.

Indeed, the first two letters Columbus sent back from his journey were not to Ferdinand and Isabella, but to Santangel and Sanchez, thanking them for their support and telling them what he had found.

The evidence seem to bear out a far more complicated picture of the man for whom our nation now celebrates a national holiday and has named its capital.

As we witness bloodshed the world over in the name of religious freedom, it is valuable to take another look at the man who sailed the seas in search of such freedoms -- landing in a place that would eventually come to hold such an ideal at its very core.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
And your person view on this is what??
For too long, scholars have ignored Columbus's grand passion: the quest to liberate Jerusalem from the Muslims.

During Columbus's lifetime, Jews became the target of fanatical religious persecution. On March 31, 1492, King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella proclaimed that all Jews were to be expelled from Spain. The edict especially targeted the 800,000 Jews who had never converted, and gave them four months to pack up and get out.

In Simon Weisenthal's book, "Sails of Hope," he argues that Columbus's voyage was motivated by a desire to find a safe haven for the Jews in light of their expulsion from Spain. Likewise, Carol Delaney, a cultural anthropologist at Stanford University, concludes that Columbus was a deeply religious man whose purpose was to sail to Asia to obtain gold in order to finance a crusade to take back Jerusalem and rebuild the Jews' holy Temple.

In Columbus's day, Jews widely believed that Jerusalem had to be liberated and the Temple rebuilt for the Messiah to return.

As we witness bloodshed the world over in the name of religious freedom, it is valuable to take another look at the man who sailed the seas in search of such freedoms -- landing in a place that would eventually come to hold such an ideal at its very core.
Muslims?? Doesn't Gentile qualify as the best phrase because that is who destroyed the Temple, by switching it to a sub-section of Gentiles it can leave Christians out of it (major funders of modern Israel) and put all the 'blame' on the ones living there who had nothing to do with any expulsion and their own book covers why they were sent into the Nation. Do they also deny this Scripture as being a prophecy, one put in place by God.

De:4:27:
And the LORD shall scatter you among the nations,
and ye shall be left few in number among the heathen,
whither the LORD shall lead you.
De:4:28:
And there ye shall serve gods,
the work of men's hands,
wood and stone,
which neither see,
nor hear,
nor eat,
nor smell.
De:4:29:
But if from thence thou shalt seek the LORD thy God, thou shalt find him,
if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.
De:4:30:
When thou art in tribulation,
and all these things are come upon thee,
even in the latter days,
if thou turn to the LORD thy God,
and shalt be obedient unto his voice;
De:4:31:
(For the LORD thy God is a merciful God;)
he will not forsake thee,
neither destroy thee,
nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which he sware unto them.

Hardly seems like God is giving them any options about 'retaking Jerusalem' prior to the appointed time. And if I posted 50 more verses that echo that thought many would still not understand and believe.
Was England 'fanatical' when they exiled them for 350 years or was it justified?
What is said about the Jewish persecution of Gentiles in just the 1st century AD by these same 'scholars'?

Which was it, find a safe haven or prepare for a war against the Gentiles? One is moral ant the create war one is immoral.

Doesn't that also hold true today for the Jews that run Israel? There is no OT or NT text that supports that view so it is a false doctrine and should get no support from any quarter.

None of the wars today are about religious freedom, wars are fought for the very same thing that is proposed in the article, conquest of a parcel of land through war. Religious freedom is so complaints don't mount against the organizers of wars, the Rothschild Banksters, Benefactor of the modern Jew so right off the bat it is a corrupt undertaking that has nothing to with a safe haven, if it was the Arabs would have been paid for their land rather than forced off through acts of violence.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
And your person view on this is what??

Muslims?? Doesn't Gentile qualify as the best phrase because that is who destroyed the Temple, by switching it to a sub-section of Gentiles it can leave Christians out of it (major funders of modern Israel) and put .

The OP is about his Religious belief's- If he was secretly a Muslim- I would have posted it as such.

The truth, only the truth so help me God
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
And your person view on this is what??

Muslims?? Doesn't Gentile qualify as the best phrase because that is who destroyed the Temple, by switching it to a sub-section of Gentiles it can leave Christians out of it (major funders of modern Israel) and put all the 'blame' on the ones living there who had nothing to do with any expulsion and their own book covers why they were sent into the Nation. Do they also deny this Scripture as being a prophecy, one put in place by God.

De:4:27:
And the LORD shall scatter you among the nations,
and ye shall be left few in number among the heathen,
whither the LORD shall lead you.
De:4:28:
And there ye shall serve gods,
the work of men's hands,
wood and stone,
which neither see,
nor hear,
nor eat,
nor smell.
De:4:29:
But if from thence thou shalt seek the LORD thy God, thou shalt find him,
if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.
De:4:30:
When thou art in tribulation,
and all these things are come upon thee,
even in the latter days,
if thou turn to the LORD thy God,
and shalt be obedient unto his voice;
De:4:31:
(For the LORD thy God is a merciful God;)
he will not forsake thee,
neither destroy thee,
nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which he sware unto them.

Hardly seems like God is giving them any options about 'retaking Jerusalem' prior to the appointed time. And if I posted 50 more verses that echo that thought many would still not understand and believe.
Was England 'fanatical' when they exiled them for 350 years or was it justified?
What is said about the Jewish persecution of Gentiles in just the 1st century AD by these same 'scholars'?

Which was it, find a safe haven or prepare for a war against the Gentiles? One is moral ant the create war one is immoral.

Doesn't that also hold true today for the Jews that run Israel? There is no OT or NT text that supports that view so it is a false doctrine and should get no support from any quarter.

None of the wars today are about religious freedom, wars are fought for the very same thing that is proposed in the article, conquest of a parcel of land through war. Religious freedom is so complaints don't mount against the organizers of wars, the Rothschild Banksters, Benefactor of the modern Jew so right off the bat it is a corrupt undertaking that has nothing to with a safe haven, if it was the Arabs would have been paid for their land rather than forced off through acts of violence.

You're a looney.

An incoherent one at that.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Way to jump from article and go right for the smear the poster mode, I guess some things never change, such as when you don't have the facts on your side.

Apparently when God speaks your reading ability hits 0/20. How about this little bit about an 'unwarranted exile', it's either true or false and I take it as being the reason for the exile (bolded part) rather than the one proposed in the article. If the bolded part is true then the confiscated wealth would be quite hight compared to the number that were exiled, if they were poor then the amount would have been very small. You could even apply that to WWII and the Jews in Germany and their confiscated wealth, if the numbers were small and the amount large then it was wealthy people being exiled. That happens in any 'take-over' so it is not Jewish persecution , it is persecution of the 1% by the new 1% of the wealthy and powerful men in the Nation.

During the Spanish re conquest of Spain from the Muslim’s, Spanish royalty offered inducements for Jews to remain in Spain. By the end of the fifteenth century many had risen to positions of power which annoyed the 'old' or 'true' Christians' who saw them taking plum jobs.
EXPULSION OF THE JEWS, 1492 TOP
In 1469, Isabel, the sister of King Henry IV of Castile, married Ferdinand, the son of John II of Aragon. By 1479 they ruled Castile and Aragon together and strengthened the Spanish church by using the Inquisition to find those practicing Judaism.. On March 31, 1492 the Edict of Expulsion was issued when the Inquisition did not achieve its aims and the Spanish Jews given four months to sell their property and leave the country. The reason given was that all prior attempts to stop Christians from returning to their Jewish roots had failed. Expulsion was the only way to guarantee Jews would not influence Spanish Christians.
Even though the root causes of expulsions between countries differed, the end result was the same. The rulers profited in the short run as debts were cancelled and property lost. Jewish merchants, officially or not, soon returned to England and France, where their financial contributions proved invaluable to the economy. In Spain, where the expulsion was for religious reasons, the Jews were not permitted to return.

Spain, The Jews, the Spanish Inquisition and After

If Chris was Jewish I don't have any big issue with it. If things in the article are wrong then it should be noted and the 'facts' inserted. How many Jews will admit the expulsion from England was over bankers and excessive usury?
 
Last edited:

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
This could be true or perhaps Chris thought, with the Inquisition going on maybe
it would be better if I took a trip for a year or two until the crazies have their fill
of blood.
Another funny aspect if he was Jewish the Knights of Columbus have a nasty
surprise in store. Interesting the history that surrounds this. In the Middle East
the Muslims are firmly in the grip of their mad hatter experience when it comes
to religion, and still is today. Before we get too carried away though, the other
group of crazies, the Christians, were in the midst of an Inquisition finding non
believers and killing them to save their souls as it were.
We often howl about the actions of the Jews and some criticism is warranted,
but then they learned from the Muslims and the Christians who were at best
mentally unstable. The problem is we see this happening in the Muslim world
and it would happen here if the Extremists of Christianity could ascend to power.
Perhaps Columbus and his crew were merely trying to get out of Dodge until the
nightmare was over.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
The OP is about his Religious belief's- If he was secretly a Muslim- I would have posted it as such.

The truth, only the truth so help me God
That's cool, like I indicated to Colpy.

If Gentiles are in control of Jerusalem then shouldn't the article reflect that or are Muslims not 'the Gentiles' that fit this verse. Muslims didn't kick them out of Jerusalem did they yet (according to the article) there was a concept that allowed Jews to make war against some people who happened top be born there, that is no more noble than the Christians were in their persecutions of 'others'. Isn't it either across the board or not?

Lu:21:24:
And they shall fall by the edge of the sword,
and shall be led away captive into all nations:
and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles,
until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.
 

DaSleeper

Trolling Hypocrites
May 27, 2007
33,676
1,666
113
Northern Ontario,
You're a looney.

An incoherent one at that.
Uncommented;-)
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Another one that can't read some easy to understand Scripture, not a big deal but why are you two making it public knowledge. You add nothing to the post except personal insults. Probably sums up your lives in general.

With the two agendas on the table and neither fulfilled I guess Chris betrayed them in the end. It certainly shows a trend, move into a new location and through racial prejudices end up centuries later still apart from the far larger body of citizens that have through that closed social network taken a larger share of the important jobs than their counterparts. Jews certainly are willing to exile Arabs from their home so they no longer are the majority yet claim extreme persecution when the same thing happens to them. Where is the data that supports the OP's contention that the exile (rather than death) was unwarranted for the above reason? Anybody got any references to support this statement"
"Contrary to popular belief, most of the educated of 15th century Europe held to the concept of a spherical earth."http://www.khouse.org/articles/1996/109/


"The Inquisition
Tomas de Torquemada was appointed inquisitor-general in the autumn of 1483, providing the Inquisition with a new impetus. In less than 12 years, the Inquisition condemned no less than 13,000 Marranos, men and women who had continued to practice Judaism in secret.9
They were tortured in La Casas Santa, the Holy Houses, and burned alive at the stake while their property was divided between the Pope and the King.
When Granada fell on January 2, 1492, the drive toward complete religious unity was reinforced. On March 31, 1492, the Edit of Expulsion was signed. The deadline for Jews to leave Spain was August 3, 1492, which was, ironically, the Ninth of Av (Tisha B'av) on the Jewish calendar, a day of fasting com-memorating the destruction of both Temples in Jerusalem.10
Columbus and his crew boarded their vessels before midnight, and on the August 3rd sailed before sunrise."


He left and then came back, that doesn't fit with exile.


Again like in most exiles the small Jewish population always insisted in taking a bigger piece of the pie than their numbers were. A point they continuously failed to grasp or they simply saw it as a price they were willing to pay. Persecution for being Jewish would have happened much earlier if the race card is the motivator. They weren't persecuted or they could not have risen in influence and social standing. That is a repeat in many of the places they were exiled from. Their own book (the OT) had God teach them how to live and grow in a foreign land, by taking the lower positions in society, that is why God sent them to Egypt for 430 years. Rather than trying to be the bosses they took the power jobs and Moses's mom was a had maiden in Pharaoh's palace so she was not a 'lowly slave' and her employers would have taken good care of her, with the exception of the number of children they were allowed to have. Is their any text to show that Egyptians were exempt from a similar rule or that their families were very large?


"After about 200 a.d., Spain became and remained a second Jewish homeland for well over a millennia. So deeply woven into the fabric of Spain are the Jews that neither history can be fully studied without considering the influence of the other."


With 1200 years to play with their methods of advancing themselves in society (modern records will show that trend continues today and the methods are anything but 'in full view of people and God'. That would also be sufficient time to show that Jews never intended to integrate into 'mainstream society' and were more intent on setting themselves up as the rulers of the country. God sent them into the Nations as Priest to teach people about God, He didn't sent them to conquer the nations as kings so perhaps they should look at that aspect when writing about their own history.
 

LiesOfTheIntell

Time Out
Feb 19, 2012
66
0
6
London, Ontario
Who cares? Oh wait I know ...

Why would anyone put time and effort into revising this history to attempt a change in Columbus's ethnicity? Who is this important to and for what purposes? Hmmm ... let me guess; building on the chosen people the "I am special" ethos with its concomittant societal privledge.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Way to jump from article and go right for the smear the poster mode, I guess some things never change, such as when you don't have the facts on your side.
It's an accurate observation, based on mountains of evidence. Not a smear.

Who cares? Oh wait I know ...
So do I...

Why would anyone put time and effort into revising this history to attempt a change in Columbus's ethnicity? Who is this important to and for what purposes? Hmmm ... let me guess; building on the chosen people the "I am special" ethos with its concomittant societal privledge.
... Obviously you.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Who cares? Oh wait I know ...

Why would anyone put time and effort into revising this history to attempt a change in Columbus's ethnicity? Who is this important to and for what purposes? Hmmm ... let me guess; building on the chosen people the "I am special" ethos with its concomittant societal privledge.

Ah - Another Jewish Conspiracy Freak.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Who would be the other ones? The authors of the article I've referenced? How about the list below, they all freaks also? I've been a freak here since I said I believed the Bible was a truthful book. Jews don't even believe most of the OT even happened, including the flood and the exodus so really it isn't like being called that in various forms is any different. It does show me who can dish it out but can't take it, seeing the two-faces is well worth the price of admission to theses threads. (let alone that it is collective makes it even funnier and trust me I have much better labels that the lame ones that gets tossed at me)

Contents

 
Last edited:

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
In this case I've already stated that it makes no difference if he was a 'hidden Jew' or 'former Jew' (Constantine converted perhaps Chris did also once he was old enough to make that decision for himself. Jews persecuting converted Jews also took place, true or not?

Here it is again, persecutrion resulting from activities that tended to try and put Jewish people in the most important role in any Nation but you and others deny that it has ever had any role in any exile from Nation yet is surfaces time and time and time again as being a factor. Just gets shoved onto something else. Why do you want me to accept as Gospel when it isn't?

converso, (Spanish: “converted”), one of the Spanish Jews who adopted the Christian religion after a severe persecution in the late 14th and early 15th centuries and the expulsion of religious Jews from Spain in the 1490s. In the minds of many Roman Catholic churchmen the conversos were still identified as Jews, partly because they remained within the Jewish communities in the cities and partly because their occupations (merchants, doctors, tailors) had been monopolized by the Spanish Jewish people. Such identification caused many Christians to regard conversos as a subversive force within the church.
In 1499 a staunch and somewhat fanatical Roman Catholic, Pedro Sarmiento, wrote the anti-Semitic Sentencia-Estatuto, which prohibited conversos from holding public or ecclesiastical offices and from testifying against Spanish Christians in courts of law. That statute was followed by the 16th-century laws of purity of blood (limpieza de sangre) which further strengthened the laws against anyone of Jewish ancestry and were more racial than religious in nature. It was not until the late 19th and early 20th centuries that some of the legalized prejudice against Jews in Spain was modified.
converso (Spanish history) -- Britannica Online Encyclopedia