The only thing you did the last time when you mentioned your wife was show your inability to control her and safe guard other people in her vicinity. That was all you managed to do, and this time all you are doing is again showing your inabilities.
Poll: Some Alberta men believe violence against women is okay
- Thread starter Locutus
- Start date
The only thing you did the last time when you mentioned your wife was show your inability to control her and safe guard other people in her vicinity. That was all you managed to do, and this time all you are doing is again showing your inabilities.
It is good for employment in AB - Those that do nornally end up in intensive care or buried.:smile:
You want to see what most Alberta rednecks think about hitting women? Go to any redneck bar and try hitting one and see how long before some lays you out on the floor.
You keep moving the goal posts, if this, if that, if such and such. Any woman who hits a man is not entitled to cry foul at whatever happens next. Why should he be required to show self restraint if she's not? If you're allowed to do it, then so am I, and if I'm not allowed to do it, then neither are you. If women are going to make the size and strength argument here in defense of their doing things men aren't allowed to do, then they'll also have to concede the larger issue, that men and women are not equal and society's rules need to define and accommodate the differences.
I've been solid in my explanations, and no one has the right to cry 'foul', didn't say that.
it seems you are talking about emotional reaction to being hit, i'm talking about restraint and
the obvious consequences, and the difference between the force of a man's physical power and
the much less power of the woman's, for me, nothing to do with emotional reactions, leaving
your wife after she strikes you, or any such thing.
Its very simple, don't hit someone you might seriously injure, unless you are defending yourself
in a situation where your life might be in danger.
I don't care about who is allowed to do what, that is beside the point.
No one is allowed to hit anyone, that doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
I'm not concerned, 'as I said before' about society, what is expected because of
equality or no equality, thats just a bunch of talk.
'don't hit someone you might seriously injure because you are bigger and stronger period.'
you might be visiting them in the hospital, and tending to their post concussion symptoms for
sometime.
This is the twenty-first century after all, so imagine the following:
Is there any difference between the two situations in your mind? If not, then we are on the same page and from what I gather, you are on the same page as Dexter.
If my 50 kg wife slapped 57 kg me in anger, I would divorce her the next day. Of course, my wife, who was a kick boxer, is much more likely to punch... the point is, I did not marry a person that has so little respect for me that they would answer an insult with injury. If the marriage ever progressed to such a level, I would leave for the betterment of both of us.
Try reading the thread again
Holy crap, you really are a misogynistic piece of work. I'm not interested in "controlling" anybody let alone the women in my life.
I was married to a redhead,no matter how many eggs and frying pans she threw at me I didnt get mad,maybe thats why she kept throwing them,I was laughing....and dodging ****e.
If you are into masochism, then it is not abuse. Reminds me of a game I used to play when I was young when we used to throw fist sized rocks at each other.
Either your admitted stupidity prevented you from understanding what Gh said, or it made you assume what he meant, with out clarification, or it has made "misogynist" your new catch word.
Which is it Jimmy?
I must say though, it was quite nice of Ariadne to teach you that big word.
I'm not into any "ism's". She just had a redhead german temper that I could not temper.
Sometimes you just have to go with the flow and dodge the bullets so you dont wind up in the ultimate doghouse.
Beware the doghouse,Dont buy her a dual bag vacuum cleaner for your anniversary.
Beware of the Doghouse- Hilarious! - YouTube
I see you are into notintoism. Yeah, my forefathers made that mistake so that I wouldn't have to.
Yep, I was thinking that word was about 6 letters beyond his capacity. Now don't breathe this to a soul, but I just had to look the sucker up myself. :lol:
It is hard to believe that we are even discussing this in what is supposed to be an evolved country... Maybe there is something in the water that these Albertans (that support violence against women) drink.
regardless........ANY violence, physical and verbal does not make for positive relationships.
those that claim that violence against women is ok.....should realize that they by virtue of being fair.....also beleive that violence against men is just as valid.
and as such.........move society back into the stone age.
well that is really practical. Now you BOTH can use it.;-)
regardless........ANY violence, physical and verbal does not make for positive relationships.
those that claim that violence against women is ok.....should realize that they by virtue of being fair.....also beleive that violence against men is just as valid.
and as such.........move society back into the stone age.
well that is really practical. Now you BOTH can use it.;-)
Agreed, but at least one person has turned that statement around: if a person believe that violence against men is ok, then by virtue of equality, shouldn't they believe that violence against women ok?