Enjoy the northern lights,good time of year for them.
I have my camera at the ready.
Enjoy the northern lights,good time of year for them.
You will freeze your hands,you just cant pull away,it's allways just a few more seconds and then whoooosh,more colors!I have my camera at the ready.
In approximately two weeks I am going to Yellowknife. For six weeks I will be running the ice roads. When I get back we will put this global warming business to rest once and for all.![]()
Yup, but do you follow the rates of this type of kill across the Arctic enough to say that it isn't more prevalent now than before?I've seen bears eat bears,griz,blacks and polars,seen Arctic fox kill their offspring,in fact a father will actually seek out the kits and kill and eat them.Thats normal,no matter what anyone seems to think.
So that means they don't drown from being too far from land or ice, according to you. I see. I too, have heard they can swim for up to 2 weeks. That's GROWN bears. Cubs can't. In case you can't quite grasp the implications, fewer cubs means smaller bear population.Polar bears dont drown unless being run by a boat,they are not fast swimmers but have been known to swim for days,thats been well documented and I have seen it and heard how the Innuit do hunt them while I lived and worked with them.
Fearmongering? lol It's more like facing the facts.The thing about all this fearmongering is it detracts from real conservationalism and the real problems faceing the arctic,like the boy who called wolf,soon people will just start ignoring the real problems.
Yeah we have bears here, too. But have you ever seen a polar hunt and kill a caribou (as you implied in a previous post)? Can they switch from hunting seal in ice to hunting these caribou within a week? A month? What do polars eat when they are on land? Wouldn't they eat the same sort of stuff that grizzly do? Doesn't that mean increased competition for food between Grizzly and Polar? Is food that plentiful in the Arctic that bear populations can still thrive?Polar bears arent starving,the Innuit arent killing emanciated bears.
Polar bears have no problem living on land,they are very adaptable,like the griz who used to be prarie dwellers.
Bears are opportunists,they dont care where they get food,it can be a dump,the sea or the tundra,they go where the easiest food is,there is no shortage of food on the tundra,at the camp we were at this year in the arctic we were far from the sea yet wandering bears on the tundra were a daily thing,they can have a range a few hundred kilometers square,very well known by anyone who knows bears.
Polar bears are cannabilistic,so are blacks and Griz,nothing new here,anyone whos spent time in the bush knows this.
uhuh And denial of facts is just as big a business.Environmental fearmongering is a huge bussiness,as you can see by some of the more ignorant comments on this topic,it scares people and they cough up money for grants,it's a huge scam and people who have experience in the bush know this.
Yup. But merely seeing bears while running camps, driving Cat, etc. and studying them for a living are two quite different issues. I have spent an awful lot of time in the bush as well, but I'd never be arrogant to consider myself an expert on bears.I've been working in the mountains and spent many years in the arctic,in 35 years I have spent 34 of them in the bush away from most people.I see more bears in a year then most will see in their lifetime,I think that counts for something.
The guy must be lying. Or else he's not as much of an expert as Kak.I guess this Inuit hunter must be full if shyte
Inuit hunter takes climate-change message to Durban conference - The Globe and Mail
The guy must be lying. Or else he's not as much of an expert as Kak.
He probably doesn't have a Supervisor's Certificate. Apparently the Occupational Health and Safety Regulations in Nunavut grant expert status in everything to anyone holding a Supervisor's Certificate. Can't have anyone second guessing the management after all. Managers know all.
Not only is he an expert on the arctic, if you remember back, he's also an expert in oil sands reclamation.
Why should he? Because he can find other LOCAL experts who disagree with you?Stick to selling furnaces ger.
No-one fell through the ice? Go figure. Let me see: average weight of male human = about 185. Average weight of bear = 700. People can walk on ice as thin as an inch.I flew through there many times and no one fell through the ice and the ice freezes and melts same time give or take 2 weeks.
Cute little anecdote. Who are "they"?Thats also where the Churchill bears pass through on their way north,funny how just north of Arviet at Rankin Inlet they encourage the people to do civil disobediance by claiming their useing self defense for hunting polars when the govt. cut back the quota's after public outcry from southerners who have never been north.
I'd like to hear from those towns, not just accept your opinion that they'll disagree.So whole towns will dis agree with that fellow,
Well, at least that's the way your opinion is, anyway.sorry but thats the way it is.
uhuhBarges freeze in same time every year on the Hudsons,so much for melting ice.
Ice break-up .78 days earlier each year. Maybe Kakato has a library of pictures with the date of spring break-up,from all that time as a manager up there.
lol Yeah I saw that, too. Um, I wonder if Kak would consider those 0.78, 0.8, and 0.3 days within his "two weeks, give or take". lolIce break-up .78 days earlier each year. Maybe Kakato has a library of pictures with the date of spring break-up,from all that time as a manager up there.
For the same region of the Hudson Bay, this paper also found break-up was occurring by a little over 0.8 days earlier each year in the Western Hudson's Bay. For the North-Central Hudson's Bay, they found ice is breaking up about 0.3 days earlier each year:
http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/451/483
Not only is he an expert on the arctic, if you remember back, he's also an expert in oil sands reclamation.
lol Yeah I saw that, too. Um, I wonder if Kak would consider those 0.78, 0.8, and 0.3 days within his "two weeks, give or take". lol
So you can't be anymore specific about breakup than that? lolNo,I just knew when we had to shut down our ice road and airstrips,breakup is usually June and if you understood permafrost you would know why breakup only takes a week.
oooo A Herc? Aren't I impressed. I don't know "how the Arctic works"? lmao Another anecdote and baseless ASSumption.I relied on experts,First air isnt going to land a c130 herc on ice unless they are damn sure it's thick enough so they are the ones that tell me when it's too thin or thick enough that they can start sending the first of allmost 100 flights..
Same with ice roads,expert profilers that only do that come and test the ice,you really dont understand how the arctic works but thats ok,I didnt either untill I started working there.
Ah. More anecdote, no verifiable data. Oh, yeah, that'll convince me more than researched fact will.As for freeze up on the Hudsons,they sail the barges untill they freeze in and the timeline varies,you cant predict the weather up there except for september comes and the sun dissapears then it freezes,in june it thaws and a freak rainstorm will speed up spring break twice as fast.
Meltwater cant go into the ground so guess where it go's?
I could care less myself what you think,I tried to explain this a long time ago in an educational fashion and get ger and a few other immature trolls asking for creds,so I give it to them and they cry and whine,dont like it then too bad.Ah. More anecdote, no verifiable data. Oh, yeah, that'll convince me more than researched fact will.
Do you have ANY evidence at all or do you continue to hope we have faith that you are correct about everything and anything?
The date of break up is occurring earlier, and freeze up is occurring later...the physics remains the same, I wonder what could be accounting for earlier break up and later freeze up? Does temperature have anything to do with the freezing point of water? Hmmm? 8O
This is so simple that I cant understand why some cant process this info,maybe because they equate the Arctic to the ice down south?