9-11-ten yrs Later

Ocean Breeze

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 5, 2005
18,363
61
48
Anyone who thinks this was not a set up is retarded.
Any engeneer, steel worker or construction worker knows building's don't
go down like that even if you had launched a missile or something
even bigger and stronger then a plane.

One can certainly speculate (and with reason) that the buldings collapsed on themselves the way they did to minimize surrounding damage and destruction It did seem, (from observing them over and over again during that event) "controlled"

When one thinks about it......the time of day was interesting . Not everyone would have been at work yet. Considering the number of people those buildings would have during the day , the number killed is not that many......to put it in perspective.

So another puzzlement ........why at that time of morning when so much more death and destruction could have happened at either mid morning or mid afternoon. Someone was not going for the maximum "kill"...
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
210
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Why that time of morning? When the commuters are be-bopping all over from hickburg to the City, one specific airplane is very difficult to sort out from the rest - especially if the transponder has jackpotted.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,285
12,789
113
Low Earth Orbit
So another puzzlement ........why at that time of morning when so much more
death and destruction could have happened at either mid morning or mid
afternoon. Someone was not going for the maximum "kill"...
The early bird gets the worm.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,285
12,789
113
Low Earth Orbit
"My instinct was to run toward it, to try to help" said Nina
Lensbouer, Tim's Lensbouer's wife and a former volunteer firefighter.
"But I got there and there was nothing, nothing there but charcoal. Instantly,
it was charcoal."
The wing box is the stronges piece of an aircraft. It holds up both wings, landing gear and the engines. They don't just ****ing vanish into char.

The wingbox, a cantilevered beam that carries the wing to the fuselage and
supports leading- and trailing-edge devices, control surfaces, engines and
landing gear, represents a portion of the wing section that begins at about the
center of the airplane and stops at approximately one-half of the span of the
wing, or ~50 ft/15.2m. The structure measures ~18 ft/5.5m at its widest point
and weighs 55,000 lb/24,947 kg, including a great deal of test-only hardware and
instrumentation.
Poof. Like magic! the strongest 1/3 of an aircraft never to be seen again.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
It would have fallen over to one side. lol

Educate yourself.

Unlike most buildings, the WTC towers were built not with a strong exterior frame......instead, the core of the towers provided the essential structural strength, and the individual floors were built on trusses extending outward from the core, something like branches off a tree trunk.

You will notice that UNLIKE CD, the WTC collapsed from the point of impact DOWN........a point with which you refuse to deal.

What that MEANS is that when the steel supports extending from the central structure failed under the heat, the entire floor collapsed onto the next one, around the central core, which directed the fall straight down, one floor into the next. It would have been almost impossible for the WTC to "have fallen over to one side"

You should really not go out calling people "retarded" when you don't have a fu cking clue what you are talking about.

A building ONE THIRD the size of the WTC took 16,000 man hours to prepare for demolition..........the walls were stripped away, major beams cut, six MILES of det cord laid etc etc, I already gave you the link.....and you and the truther idiots think this was done to the WTC without anyone noticing..........
 
Last edited by a moderator:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,285
12,789
113
Low Earth Orbit
What that MEANS is that when the steel supports extending from the central
structure failed under the heat, the entire floor collapsed onto the next one,
around the central core, which directed the fall straight down, one floor into
the next. It would have been almost impossible for the WTC to "have fallen over
to one side"
Even NIST changed from the "pancake theory".
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
Anyone who thinks this was not a set up is retarded.
Any engeneer, steel worker or construction worker knows building's don't
go down like that even if you had launched a missile or something
even bigger and stronger then a plane.

I don't know about 'engeneer's, but many engineers who understand steel structures can understand exactly why the buildings fell down. I know that when I turned on the tv and saw the first tower in flames, I knew it was coming down very very soon.

Now, maybe your structural classes were different, I don't know.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
I don't know about 'engeneer's, but many engineers who understand steel structures can understand exactly why the buildings fell down. I know that when I turned on the tv and saw the first tower in flames, I knew it was coming down very very soon.

Now, maybe your structural classes were different, I don't know.



The whole thing was staged. The official story is just impossible for me to believe.