That's the title of the article, I posted for discussion. Can you show me with a quote, where I endorsed it, in any way shape or form?
First Nations paying tax payers bills for services
- Thread starter CDNBear
- Start date
I know a guy who makes posts like that all the time. He likes to see the reaction and potential of thought brewing in the brains of the blinded.
I agree, you made a nice try, but yes, sadly, you did fail.
Can you please provide a quote, of me endorsing the OP, in anyway?
Neat idea. I post things disagree with all the time. Something I can back up, unlike Cannucks empty claims.
I'm not interested in searching through your 16,000 post to find a quote. If you disagree with the article, say so.
Given your clear agenda on native issues, I'm not likely to believe you anyway but knock yourself out.
The way the system is set up all Canadians have access to the same things. All you have to do is claim your rights and defend them. It baffles me why so few ever grasp on to that.
Equal means equal. If you feel you aren't getting an equal share say something and it will happen. Sitting around wishing for things just ain't gonna work no matter what your heritage is.
Equal means equal. If you feel you aren't getting an equal share say something and it will happen. Sitting around wishing for things just ain't gonna work no matter what your heritage is.
Cool, now that you conceded to that fact, can you answer the previous questions you chose to avoid?
What is my agenda?
Absolutely. DaS has more rights than I do.
Too true.
I'm still waiting for Cannuck to tell me what rights I have that others don't, as he has claimed several times.
I don't have any. Well maybe I can be too modest sometimes but that's just being nice.
What makes you think you're not getting a free ride while there are both outstanding land claims and treaty violations?
BC has plenty of treaties under negotiation right now. Fact is, you are a squatter on someone else's land until those negotiations are concluded successfully. I am sure that if you had some inheritance due to you and someone simply took that, you too would be looking for some relief to that situation. That you feel you can dismiss this and all claims by First Nations in Canada shows both how ignorant you are and a disturbing aspect of bigotry on your part.
And the only thing you've "pwnt" is your own weak ass argument which I dare say is becoming a continuing theme for you.
You lie...that's obviously one...and a big one at that because nothing else you say matters once it's been determined that you are a liar. As for the rest of your post, I respectfully disagree. You've bought too much into CB's propaganda.
If you disagree with the article, say so.
You keep saying that, but as of yet, have failed to provide any proof of any agenda, let alone clarified what that agenda is.
What is my agenda?
That's irrelevant. Your present claims, are claims you have made well before I posted the OP.
Either you can prove them or concede.
Wasn't that one of your biggest issues with SJP? His failure to concede when he could not support his claims? I'd hate to see you expose yourself as a hypocrite.
OK, so I guess it's pretty clear that you do agree with the article. That wasn't so hard was it?
Half the nations are not involved in treaty negotiations because they realized that the restrictions imposed by the government were designed to favour the government and screw First nations. They are a setup. As long as they don't cede their territory, they remain sovereign nations. It will be up to the courts to decide, which holds up "development" (read: rape of resources).
Why can't you support your claims?
That was your biggest issue with SJP. Now you are doing the exact same thing.
So you are a liar and a hypocrite?
You're quite right Cliffy. The word that makes most Councils cringe is, "Incorporation".
I agree, you have 'pwned' yourself. By exhibiting the same traits, that you railed against.
You had your chance to discuss the OP with me, but passed it up for silly trolling.
The question you asked, can't be answered with a yes or no. There are aspects I agree with, and others I don't.
Cannuck has already stated that Canada and Canadians are responsible for all treaties made with the First Nations people as long as they are considered Nations. Since the SCC AND the International Courts DO consider the First Nations people to be legal nations then he is on the same side as the rest of us in wanting to see the existing treaties upheld and proper meaningful negotiations for those treaties that have not been ratified yet.
Thank you for your support Cannuck, it is appreciated.
Thank you for your support Cannuck, it is appreciated.
If you disagree with the article, say so.
You are in error. You're probably getting used to that though.
You are in error. You're probably getting used to that though.
Are you having trouble understanding English in your spastic attempts to look superior?
Would you like to discuss the OP?
How so?
I can provide quotes from you confirming your acknowledgment of the SCC ruling, and you say the gov't should negotiate only with recognized nations.
By your own standards, Gh is right.
Ya I know, trying to get Cannuck to back up his claims, is like trying to nail jello to the wall.
You should have seen him attack an old member her named SirJosephPorter about that very thing.
It seems Cannuck is a liar and a hypocrite.