Don't get me wrong Ton, I think harpers staff acted out of line. But if I were in there shoes, I might be a little weary too.
Many things are sensible to be weary of- a picture taken with a friend and Iggy is not one of them.
Don't get me wrong Ton, I think harpers staff acted out of line. But if I were in there shoes, I might be a little weary too.
Ton, I may be more paranoid then you, but if I see a friend snuggling one of my enemies on facebook, I`m going to ask questions.Many things are sensible to be weary of- a picture taken with a friend and Iggy is not one of them.
Ton, I may be more paranoid then you, but if I see a friend snuggling one of my enemies on facebook, I`m going to ask questions.
Yep. But I imagine that if i was holding rallies, I would want them to go peacefully.That's a completely different situation. And I imagine that your list of enemies mean something altogether different than political rivals.
Ton, I may be more paranoid then you, but if I see a friend snuggling one of my enemies on facebook, I`m going to ask questions.
I get that chance, Harpers boys don`t have the time. I'm not condoning, but I can understand it.
Quote:“Fine, said lots of people. Leave gays alone? Fair enough. But, let ’em be Boy Scout leaders? Have each other’s benefits? Adopt kids? Marry each other? Ridiculous. Anybody seeking political office who suggested it would have been laughed off the hustings. Yet, the Liberals are ready to legalize gay marriage. How did we get to this point?”
I was to lazy to type the word adversary.What makes you use the term 'enemies'?
You can assume anything you like. I can see you already managed to come to your own judgment, without anything other then a quote from someone else.So can I assume from this quote in your prior post you would against things like same sex marriage and benefits?
Yep. But I imagine that if i was holding rallies, I would want them to go peacefully.
My standards are higher I guess. My list of why Harper shouldn't lead this country, contains actual issues.Of course, but now we're back to what is and isn't sensible. If Harper, his team, or anyone else feels that the picture in question is a reasonable threat, then I really don't think they should have any control over how this country handles it's affairs.
Ya, damned if does, damned if he doesn't. I know, I remember you defending him when he was railed for trying to have a personality.When you put all the pieces together, the picture that emerges is of a paranoid group that go to all lengths to avoid scrutiny.
I laugh at those that think they're actually objective.I personally take great pleasure at laughing at those who ignore how tightly the PMO controls Ottawa, and then seem to forget that when it comes to controlling their campaign.
You can assume anything you like. I can see you already managed to come to your own judgment, without anything other then a quote from someone else.
My list of why Harper shouldn't lead this country, contains actual issues.
What part of "You can assume anything you like." Didn't you understand?Your post was slighly unclear so I asked you to clarify if that was your belief...I did not impose it on you. Did you miss the question mark or do you not undertand what it means??
Sorry, again, I prefer to have discussions with people who are objective, don't irrationally liken Canadian political leaders to tyrants and have some semblance of critical thought.Do tell us what these 'objective' issues are.
What part of "You can assume anything you like." Didn't you understand?
You claim you have these high standards on the issues but won't discuss your position on the issues. Hmmmm, are you scared to expose yourself for who you really are and what you really stand for?I don't discuss issues like that, which is actually a "freedom", with people that believe only the freedoms they like, should apply, and only how they would like them to be applied.
Good to know, I'll remind you of that, the next time I see you doing it.I would never assume to actually know someone's opinion unless they state it clearly.
Oops, there it is...You claim you have these high standards on the issues but won't discuss your position on the issues. Hmmmm, are you scared to expose yourself for who you really are and what you really stand for?
Did she contact the labour board? Go to the press?lol... oh wow... you guys get that this stuff is the tip of the iceberg, right? A federal librarian I know was DOCKED PAY for bitching about the conservative gov on his fb page, and forced to remove his Liberal campaign placquard from his lawn lest he lose his job. If the gov doesn't like who you're talking to, who you're associated with, or the opinion you express, and they have even the REMOTEST way of letting you know that, they will. She's lucky that her only entanglement with this government is that of trying to attend an event.
lol... oh wow... you guys get that this stuff is the tip of the iceberg, right? A federal librarian I know was DOCKED PAY for bitching about the conservative gov on his fb page, and forced to remove his Liberal campaign placquard from his lawn lest he lose his job. If the gov doesn't like who you're talking to, who you're associated with, or the opinion you express, and they have even the REMOTEST way of letting you know that, they will. She's lucky that her only entanglement with this government is that of trying to attend an event.
Did she contact the labour board? Go to the press?
Run with it. I hope it helps you drop Harpers lead a couple points. It seems things like facts aren't required when discussing Harper's gov't. Why start now.No, he values his job and has already been shown that it is in jeopardy if you get out of line. Not everyone has the stomach for the battle.
My standards are higher I guess. My list of why Harper shouldn't lead this country, contains actual issues.
I don't discuss issues like that, which is actually a "freedom", with people that believe only the freedoms they like, should apply, and only how they would like them to be applied.
You claim you have these high standards on the issues but won't discuss your position on the issues. Hmmmm, are you scared to expose yourself for who you really are and what you really stand for?
Sorry, again, I prefer to have discussions with people who are objective, don't irrationally liken Canadian political leaders to tyrants and have some semblance of critical thought.
That automatically excludes you.
Sorry, again, I prefer to have discussions with people who are objective, don't irrationally liken Canadian political leaders to tyrants and have some semblance of critical thought.