I watched the first couple of minutes and everything I saw has already been soundly refuted. Is there any earth shattering new info in that video? I can't be bothered to sit through it all.
Canadian 9/11 Petition for Parliament
- Thread starter darkbeaver
- Start date
I watched the first couple of minutes and everything I saw has already been soundly refuted. Is there any earth shattering new info in that video? I can't be bothered to sit through it all.
Indeed. Which is why we wonder at the repeated mention of 'melting' steel. Some people don't understand physics, I guess.
An hour at 1000F will weaken that grade of steel by 10% which will at some point hinge along the upward forces and downward forces.
What are the odds all columns were uniformly heated (interior and exterior) to 1000F and all hinged at the same time?
How much heat does an open web steel joist supporting a concrete-topped floor pan take?
And your point?
Which is the subsidiary that tests water. Ryan has no back ground or education in structural steel.
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=1064737
On Environmental Health Laboratories Inc email, letter head, as an authority.
And rightly so. Although I have no doubt why you will fail to understand why.
Because that is fact.
That's because he wasn't. He work at Environmental Health Laboratories Inc. Which deals with water quality, and has nothing to do with steel, fire protection or anything that has anything to do with any part of the investigation of the WTC collapse.
This is the problem with you people. You have no idea how to do any research.
Mar 26 05:56
Military officer’s 9/11 case against Bush officials to be heard April 5
Center For 9/11 Justice
Edited by Rady Ananda
A Top Secret Military Specialist, who was injured in the Pentagon explosion on September 11, 2001 and who sued Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Air Force General Richard Myers for conspiracy, terrorism, constitutional violations, and for personal injuries, will have her case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit (Connecticut) on April 5...
Military officer’s 9/11 case against Bush officials to be heard April 5
Center For 9/11 Justice
Edited by Rady Ananda
A Top Secret Military Specialist, who was injured in the Pentagon explosion on September 11, 2001 and who sued Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Air Force General Richard Myers for conspiracy, terrorism, constitutional violations, and for personal injuries, will have her case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit (Connecticut) on April 5...
And what makes you and her think a ruling different then...
Will come from the appellate court?
I don't think that way. However the fact remains that the appeal court sees the merit in rehearing the case. That alone is damaging to the enemy.
(Complaint was frivolous and based on “cynical delusion and fantasy.”Judge Denny Chin )
If that were actually the case Judge Chin could have ordered a psyciatric evaluation evaluation immediately. As it stands the judge has been found full of ****.
fify.
The appellate court hears most cases.
That alone means nothing.
He doesn't have to.
Not at all. I'm sure you believe he is though. I mean you have presented your usual litany of evidence to back it all up.
fify.
Not at all. I'm sure you believe he is though. I mean you have presented your usual litany of evidence to back it all up.
Oh yeah, I forgot far and wide you're known and respected for your love of evidence. Mr Evidence we call you, with respect,braindead idiot.
Oh yeah, I forgot far and wide you're known and respected for your love of evidence. Mr Evidence we call you, with respect,braindead idiot.
CB's evidence is on par with yours. You both need to do some research
Evidence | Define Evidence at Dictionary.com
Right you're another expert who actually had to look up and post the dictionary meaning. You need try to win the Guiness world record for not posting anything.
Of course, nothing of any substance to add, just be a clown.Oh yeah, I forgot far and wide you're known and respected for your love of evidence. Mr Evidence we call you, with respect,braindead idiot.
And yet you haven't been able to debate me on anything, as seen in 4 threads now. All completely void of any evidence supplied by you, to refute anything I've posted.
You are amazing Joey!
You got him pegged perfectly DB.Right you're another expert who actually had to look up and post the dictionary meaning. You need try to win the Guiness world record for not posting anything.
I didn't "have" to post it. I just thought it would help you out. You seem to have some issues with the meaning.