So you are saying that you WANT higher taxes, more government interference in our lives and more rules made by a mindless bureaucracy who's only goal is to protect their cushy jobs?
Not in my country...
Is this your country? By that I mean, does the government look out for your interests or someone else's interests at your expense?
I want higher taxes and lower taxes. The poor pay taxes when they shouldn't. The middle class already pay their fair share. Most wealthy people and corporations don't pay enough.
You've been fed a lie that in order to reduce middle class taxes a little, taxes on the wealthy elite must be reduced a lot. That's BS. Taxes can target wealthy people directly without affecting the middle class. Here are some examples.
Property sales should be taxed by a graduated system. Under some value (say $500k), real estate transactions should not be taxed. As the property value increases beyond that amount taxes increase (1% tax on $500-$600k, 2% on $700-$800k, 3% on $800-900k, 4% on $900-1M, .... and so on until buying homes worth tens of millions of dollars generate significant revenue.
Capital gains should be taxed at the same rate as personal income tax. Income is income. Few poor or middle class people earn capital gains.
The current tax system is graduated, but not graduated enough. The more you make, the more you should pay.
Extra taxes on luxuries: jewelry, yachts, private planes, expensive restaurants, certain types of cars and trucks... any consumer item which isn't a necessity. Basically the wealthy should have to pay a premium to maintain an opulent lifestyle.
Currently the flat HST taxes necessities and luxuries at the same rate, which punishes the poor for the benefit of the wealthy.
I support better funded social services like schools, hospitals, the criminal justice system.... and social infrastructure like roads, water....
I am against fiscal mismanagement and unnecessary bureaucracy. I expect that the people we elect and the civil servants take their fiscal responsibilities seriously. The auditor general should have the authority to audit how all our tax dollars are spent without exception to identify waste and corruption. We need increased accountability and tougher penalties for civil servants and politicians who abuse the public trust.
Absolutely correct, but you could add a few more characteristics to your neo-con list,
1. Elimination of any organization that might in any way improve the wages or working conditions of the average citizen; especially unions.
2. Control of mainstream media and using it to spread right wing propaganda or dumbing down the intellectual content until mainstream news media is offers little more than a series of titillating vignettes, almost completely devoid of intellectual content.
3. Creation of an enemy by inventing one if a real enemy does not exist.
4. Control of the political process through the buying of elected officials.
Yes these are additional characteristics of neo-conservatism. More probably exist.
It's not right is good and left is wrong, its right is right and wrong is wrong. The left wing genuinely cares for lower social classes like the homeless, the mentally ill, the working man/woman and so forth. That's a good mentality and they're right for caring about their fellow man. Conservatives care about their own certain issues and they're right on certain things.
That's right, because less taxes means more cash in YOUR pocket! Less regulation and government leaves YOU more free to maneuver and be successful. And less social services, like ones we don't need(heroin "shoot-up" clinics) save money for more ESSENTIAL social services like mental health...
...off topic rambling...
Drug addicts should be in treatment rather than trying to knife me for pocket change. I also don't see the benefit of locking harmless people in prison at the cost of $100k/year. I'd rather spend a few dollars on methadone to make drug addicts harmless and the rest on a poor kid going through medical school.
More taxes does not necessarily mean more cash in your pocket. If you cut taxes, you cut social services. Then when you need these services, you have to pay more for them as an individual. You'd have more money in your pocket if everyone pays for them collectively through taxes. They we get a group discount and more control.
Examples:
1) Children need education. We pay taxes to fund the public education system. Neo-cons would like to privatize schools and turn them into businesses. Only wealthy children could afford a decent education. The majority of children would get a poorly funded, substandard education. Even if you don't have children, you have a stake in making sure that higher education is merit based (publicly funded), not wealth based (privately funded). If only wealthy people can afford to provide a decent education for their children, then people who should be engineers and doctors will end up flipping burgers for a living while wealthy incompetents perform open heart surgery and build bridges.
2) If you need heart bypass surgery, it shouldn't matter whether you are rich or poor. While cutting taxes might save a middle class person a few hundred dollars, it isn't going to pay the $100,000 medical bill. We'd all be better off if our medical services are paid by our taxes. Think of taxes as a group medical policy. Many Americans get medical insurance, through work, but if they get sick, they loose their jobs and their medical insurance. So when it counts, you as an individual get shafted.
I can cite hundreds of examples where buying services wholesale through tour taxes rather than as an individual puts money in your pocket and results in better services and fairness.
The left cares for the working man? The working man isn't on minimum wage and the working man can't afford a home without a mortage; and increasingly the case, the working man can't find a job and his home is about to be foreclosed because the Hong Kong businessmen; who are speculating homes in our cities, are the same ones who are running the factories with Chinese workers back in China!
Sure, vote for Liberal and NDP and vote for the Lawyers that created the mess we are in at the moment. I think we're better off trusting the economic matters to the economists; such as Stephen Harper, than a pseduo-intellectual like Ignatieff who has spent more years in the United States and probably thinks their economy is terrific as it is.
Stephen Harper represents the interests of wealthy people who fund the conservative party and control the MSM. His top priority is to get re-elected, which means satisfying those people, not average Canadians. His main focus is to make wealthy people wealthier and help powerful people who control the MSM, control the message. He doesn't care about the poor and middle class. As long as the MSM support Harper, they can manipulate the majority of poor and middle class into voting for Harper, even when its against their best interests. The manipulated majority need only have a MSM manufactured perception, which comes from controlling what people know, what they think and how they vote.
By the way, the same people who pull the Conservative's strings also pull the Liberal's strings. If people were only offered one choice, they'd wise up pretty fast. Instead we perceive two choices, which are superficially different, but are fundamentally the same choice.
The best explanation of how Canadians have been scammed over the years:
The Story of Mouseland: As told by Tommy Douglas in 1944
YouTube - The Story of Mouseland: As told by Tommy Douglas in 1944