The cops also should be either charged with a crime or reinstated to active duty ASAP, not kept on the payroll forever while some prosecutor try's to make up their mind. Not fair to the cop nor the taxpayer.
The cops also should be either charged with a crime or reinstated to active duty ASAP, not kept on the payroll forever while some prosecutor try's to make up their mind. Not fair to the cop nor the taxpayer.
According to JLM.
Good example is the Rodney King case...all were declared innocent even though what was seen on the video seemed conclusive guilt of battery.
The cops also should be either charged with a crime or reinstated to active duty ASAP, not kept on the payroll forever while some prosecutor try's to make up their mind. Not fair to the cop nor the taxpayer.
That's not what I got out of it. Sheeple that were told what was happening in the video may have thought that.
Avro -Wow!
JLM's own little China.
The problem is if it were you or I we would be sent to jail forced to a bail hearing and then
the other problems would start for us, criminal record, the court system likely fired from our
job. I a democratic society where people are treated equally before the law, why are these
people not formally charged imprisoned and forced the the bail process and be off the job
at their own expense? I guess the equal mean some are more equal than others
JLM wants the cops to be treated as guilty before they are proven so....he has said it many times.
He is a cop hater and a proven racist,:smile:
Once the cop is charged all pay should be suspended till conclusion of trial. If innocent they get all back pay, if guilty hang them. Just my thought: Police should be held to a higher punishment if they
Once the cop is charged all pay should be suspended till conclusion of trial. If innocent they get all back pay, if guilty hang them. Just my thought: Police should be held to a higher punishment if they violate their trust to the people they are sworn to protect..
Nothing worse than to violate their trust.
Yes, Canada should have a national police force responsible to all the people of Canada.
Absolutely correct on all points (and they are worth repeating). You have be careful about mentioning "hanging" though:lol: or we'll have this retard back yammering.
Repeatedly.Taze 'em...
Oh EAO, as soon as I saw the tone of this post, I nearly wet myself laughing. Seriously.JLM,
So if I understand you correctly, you believe we shouldn't waste time on a trial before punishing someone, when we all know they are guilty.
Why not replace the entire criminal justice system with citizen action groups?
The self appointed citizen action group just accuses someone of something, ie Nazi, terrorist, communist, witch... and they show up outside the criminal's house at night, kick in the doors, drag the person out into the street and just hang 'em. I can see many benefits such as community involvement, immediacy and low cost.... no need for police, lawyers, judges, courts or prisons.
Your car can be removed from the impound as soon as you pay the towing and impound fee. Your license is actually the property of the Province and is a privilege, not a right.I didn't claim that you have a right to drive. You do, however, have the right to a trial for a criminal charge. Imposing the sentence when you are charged (ie, seizing your car and suspending your license) with a CRIMINAL offense is just the tiniest bit in conflict with our Charter.
But don't let that stop you.
We know you don't, but he's still right.You say that like I care.
One of the reasons we have such piss poor policing now is that very few competent people want the job. If you have your way, even the incompetents might think twice about the career. Who do you suggest we hire then to be police officers? The RCMP is already having a difficult time attracting people.
Yes it is. Care to answer it?
Absolutely correct on all points (and they are worth repeating). You have be careful about mentioning "hanging" though:lol: or we'll have this retard back yammering.
OK, change it to lock them up.![]()
Innocence until proven guilty.
It's when he's proven guilty that the hammer should fall and in the case of abuse of authority, it should fall the hardest.
I'm not talking about convicting I'm talking about being paid. If the work is to be suspended it only follows the pay should be suspended. If the final outcome shows him to be innocent then he should be paid for the time missed.
Tough, maybe they should think about that before kicking the sh*t out of people or tasering them to death.