anyone who can lick their own nostrils is generally not looked upon with desire no.
It's not the actual nostril lick that should impress. It's the manual dexterity that counts.
anyone who can lick their own nostrils is generally not looked upon with desire no.
Let alone those that release good old grand dad's ashes to the wind in the meadow. I don't think we could possibly not be eating our dead and then passing those nutrients on in our offspring when they come along.
So when you die, your body breaks down and returns to the source from whence it came to return again in the body of another.
In a weird sort of way.
Well... we are in a planetary emergency... if you believe in global warming... you must give up meat... you must do your part.
I on the other hand cannot wait to eat a King Sized Prime Rib tonight.
It's not the actual nostril lick that should impress. It's the manual dexterity that counts.
Well... we are in a planetary emergency... if you believe in global warming... you must give up meat... you must do your part.
I on the other hand cannot wait to eat a King Sized Prime Rib tonight.
Interesting discussion I had with the wife yesterday. She was talking about buying into the whole reincarnation idea, and so I thought about that for a bit.
I don't know about spiritually but physically it makes an awful lot of sense.
Mostly we're dumped into the ground with some amount of pomp and ceremony as has happened for ages. What's left of us slowly turns back into the elements that we're made up of and is at some point so much food for plants and worms. Thinking on that, it's probably pretty difficult not to accept that at some point our bits re-enter the food cycle through ingesting of other creatures who ingest the things that ingest us once we're dust.
Let alone those that release good old grand dad's ashes to the wind in the meadow. I don't think we could possibly not be eating our dead and then passing those nutrients on in our offspring when they come along.
So when you die, your body breaks down and returns to the source from whence it came to return again in the body of another.
In a weird sort of way.
A new study points to the environmental benefits of curbing one's carnivorous ways.
Consuming less meat could help slow global warming by reducing the number of livestock and thereby lowering the amount of methane emitted by animals, scientists said Thursday.Eating less meat, such as steak and hamburgers, would cut the gases emitted by cows that contribute to global warming, scientists say.![]()
(CBC)
In an article in the Lancet, researchers said people should eat fewer steaks and hamburgers. Reducing global red meat consumption by 10 per cent, they said, would cut the gases emitted by cows, sheep and goats that contribute to global warming.
"We are at a significant tipping point," said Geri Brewster, a nutritionist at Northern Westchester Hospital in New York, who was not connected to the study. "If people knew that they were threatening the environment by eating more meat, they might think twice before ordering a burger."
Full Story
How about it. Will you eat less meat to help the planet?
More...
If we all go to being vegetarian won't our flatulence do the same thing as cow farts?
Not even a brighter blue flame? To heck with that *wolf hauls a steak from the freezer*
OK GranpaI say lets cook a good stake (sic) and outlaw forest fires.
Studies like this are a giant waste of money.
Let me guess-that's humour right?here's what I say to that: Bite Me!
here's what I say to that: Bite Me!