The latest now (for me) is Dr. Judy Wood's theory about directed energy weapons and the 'dusification' of the Trade Towers.... Hurricane Erin on Sept 11, 2001 receiving barely a mention .
It sounds as though she is onto something, especially because of her lack of popularity in trying to sue NIST. ......but she has some followers and I am one right now.
The Journal of 9/11 Research and 9/11 Issues
She is one smart woman and never guesses. She says what she sees and knows and addresses some 1400 cars in the area that were only partialy damaged, whole fronts blown and backs in mint condition, images of thick steel dissolving to dust in midair....has been on this since 2001.
I'm sorry, what does the hurricane have to do with anything?
By the time the hurricane reached Bermuda it was a mere Cat 2 storm and based on it's projected path well out into the atlantic ocean, the only serious impact it would have had on the area is a cool breeze...... and official records state even when it passed by Bermuda, very little damage was caused, which would conclude that its relation to the New York area would be irrelevant.
Hurricane Erin was “born” on about the 1st of September 2001, and travelled up towards NYC. Hurricane Erin was the closest to NYC on 9/11/01 and was the largest on this date (although wind speeds were greater the day before).......
What does it size have to do with anything?
.....The crew of the International Space Station (ISS) can see "terrorist Carnage" in NYC on 9/11/01, they did not report seeing a hurricane that was just out of their camera shot (this video was shown on CNN).
Considering the hurricane didn't just appear out of thin air, they already knew about it and it's location compared to the US coast, it was simply not an issue to comment on when it had nothing to do with what was actually happening in NY.
...... The development of the Erin is considered, and a comparison made to Hurricane Katrina, for the reason that Katrina and Erin were of comparable size (Erin was bigger, by most measures), yet we heard almost nothing of the risk Erin posed near 9/11 compared to what we heard about Katrina. Erin was also the subject of an extended study mission which united researchers from 10 universities, five NASA centers and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration”........
So What? Who cares how many researchers and brain wizards they sent to look at this thing..... "We" heard almost nothing about the risk of this hurricane, because it posed no risk in the first place due to being so far out into the Atlantic...... I'm still trying to figure out what she's going on about with 9/11 and this hurricane..... if she's leaning towards some dumb idea that the Hurricane somehow blew down the WTC, she's more of a lunatic then I originally thought and knows nothing about Hurricanes.
A short comparison is drawn between some of the effects seen with the materials in collision in Tornados and hurricanes with the anomalous changes in materials seen with Hutchison Effect.
^ And what she shows is a piece of wood embedded into a tree and an Intrepid flung over someone's fence...... even if a Hurricane is a Cat 5 storm, the chances of a hurricane having the ability to lift a car or embed a chunk of plywood into a tree in the manner they show on the site is not only unlikely, but a bit retarded to even suggest.
Those things are from a Tornado since they have the power and speed, but not a Hurricane, and if she had half a damn brain or experience living in a Hurricane, she'd know this. And why didn't I hear of any specific details about that hurricane on that site? Wind speeds, what category it was when it passed by New York? All she did was mention a hurricane was off the coast of New York and made a very basic and generalized claim of how Tornadoes and Hurricanes are somehow exactly the same, while describing what might happen in the worst case scenarios..... not what actually happened in this case.
Look at the photos and other imaging of New York during that day and you'll see that people were walking around like it was any other day (before the attack) there wasn't excessive winds or rains that day...... in fact, the sky was blue with a little bit of cloud off in the distance...... if the Hurricane really posed any real risk in the area, guess what?
The planes going in and out of the area, not just in New York, but in neighboring states, would have all been grounded, wouldn't they?
Apparently I see nothing explaining why she's going on about hurricanes to the WTC other then to add a pile of more useless information to her web site in order to make her amateur-looking web site look like they have all sorts of information backing their claims of this so-called Directed Energy Weapon.... she's attempting to saturate her site with so much useless information that she hopes to burn out the dummies who jump onto her site and just assume all this technobabble somehow is explained properly and thus she's onto something.....
She goes from Hurricanes, to Tornadoes, to Tesla-coils, from Earthquakes from the other side of the continent....... seriously does she somehow think that the whole universe was just out to get the people in the towers that day, and the terrorists in the planes were just icing on the cake? :roll:
Seriously where's the logic in inflicting some Directed Energy Weapon at your own country, at your own people, and at your capitalist-hub to the rest of the world, when there's thousands of other targets in the world, like third world countries, villages, communities which if they were wiped off the map, nobody would have noticed or cared to investigate what happened?
Seems like a waste of resources considering all one had to do is just ignore all the terrorist watches and warnings/reports of a pending attack on US soil during the months leading up to the attack and just let the "Bad Guys" do their dirty work for you.
And with all these stupid ideas of holograms, bombs being planted into the building during it's construction some 40 years ago, hurricanes being so far off the coast to have zero weather effect in New York, yet somehow still having an effect, earthquakes, the International Space Station firing its photon torpedoes at New York......
... you know, there comes a time when someone has to look in the mirror and say out loud, while keeping a straight face,
"I'VE GONE COMPLETELY FK'N NUTZ!"
She says what she sees and knows and addresses some 1400 cars in the area that were only partialy damaged, whole fronts blown and backs in mint condition
Um.... maybe the reason why they were only partially damaged was because the sides that were damaged were the sides exposed to the debris that fell, which in turn protected the other sides, which occurs in any explosion or impact with a one-directional projectile?
If I toss a grenade at your feet while you're facing it and it goes off, chances are you're not only going to lose the use of your hands and feet, but much of the damage inflicted on you will be done on the exposed side of your body, facing the explosion, while your back area and ass will still appear mostly untouched...... simply because most of the shrapnel and explosion was absorbed by the front of your body.
This woman isn't a genius and is pulling arguments out of her ass by using over-technically spoken jibberish for common sense things, in order to some how make these common sense things seem like some evil boogie man conspiracy.
She says what she sees and knows..... and what she sees she knows nothing about and what she knows is obviously very limited.
