10 Things Americans Must Remember on Memorial Day

JBeee

Time Out
Jun 1, 2007
1,826
52
48


By Nora Eisenberg, AlterNet
May 29, 2010,



According to Yale historian David Blight, Memorial Day (first called Decoration Day), the U.S. holiday commemorating fallen soldiers, got its start at the end of the Civil War. In 1865 in Charleston, South Carolina former African-American slaves exhumed Union soldiers from a mass grave on the site of Charleston's exclusive racetrack and buried them in individual graves, a ten-day project that ended in a day of celebration of the nation, peace, and freedom in which thousands of Charleston's black families gathered to decorate graves, pray, play games, and picnic. 135 years after the end of our Civil War, our nation is engaged in near civil wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, which we had a part in starting and no plans for ending.

"We don't do body counts,"General Tommy Franks, commander of the U.S. invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq, famously remarked, when asked about Iraqi civilian casualties. We do do body counts of our own -- though we don't talk about them much. Thanks to groups like Veterans for Common Sense, Department of Defense and Veterans Affairs data have been publicized, and thanks to projects like Iraq Body Count, we do count them.

As we picnic and play this Memorial Day, let's try to remember that:

1. To date, there have been 90,955 documented U.S. troop casualties in the current wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Of these, 4,378 troops have died; 37,280 have been wounded in action; and 48,272 have been medically evacuated due to injury or disease.

2. The Department of Defense last year warned that as many as 20 percent of veterans (360,000) may have suffered traumatic brain injury from IED blasts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Blast injuries generally do not result in skull fractures or loss of consciousness yet the Institute of Medicine has reported that these traumatic brain injuries may cause diffuse brain bleeding and result in PTSD and problems with mood, attention, concentration, memory, pain, balance, hearing and vision.

3. 508,152 Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are patients in the VA system. Thousands more are waiting as much as a year for VA treatment for serious ailments including traumatic brain injury. 243,685 (48 percent) are mental health patients and 143,530 (28 percent) are being treated for PTSD. A recent University of Michigan study demonstrated that PTSD sufferers have more physical illness in later life as their immune systems take back seats to systems needed for crises.

4. Every day, five U.S. soldiers attempt suicide, a 500 percent increase since 2001.

5. Every day 18 U.S. veterans attempt suicide, more than four times the national average. Of the 30,000 suicides each year in the U.S., 20 percent are committed by veterans, though veterans make up only 7.6 percent of the population.

6. Female veteran suicide is rising at a rate higher than male veteran suicides.

7. In 2009, there were 3,230 reports of sexual assault including rape, according to the DoD, with many more that number thought to be unreported. In a 2003 survey of female veterans 30 percent reported being raped in the military. A 2004 study of veterans with PTSD reported that 71 percent of women seeking treatment said they were sexually assaulted or raped while serving in the military.

8. The number of U.S. service men and women killed in Afghanistan has doubled in the first quarter of 2010. compared to the same quarter last year. In the first two months of 2010, injuries tripled, with U.S. casualties expected to rise still more with the troop surge in Afghanistan.

9. 2,052,405 service men and women have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan since 2001. Over 40 percent of them have been deployed two or more times. Some will have been deployed as many as five years Currently 94,000 U.S. troops are serving in Afghanistan and 92,000 in Iraq.

And last but not least:

10. Estimates of civilian deaths from violence in Iraq alone range from a conservative 105,000 (Iraq Body Count project) to over 1.2 million (UK pollster Opinion Research Business), with estimates by Johns Hopkins at 655,000. More than 125,000 civilians have been injured in Iraq and 4 million displaced, with civilian death and injury in 2010 rising each month. By most estimates, tens of thousands of Afghan civilians have been killed or injured since the 2001 invasion, over 200,00 have been internally displaced, and over 2 million have become refugees, with civilian deaths and injuries rising dramatically in 2010.

The war in Iraq is in its seventh year. The war in Afghanistan, in its ninth year, is the longest war in our history. On Memorial Day, as we remember the dead and wounded, ours and theirs, the latest installment of 30,000 new troops is readying for new battles with Taliban fighters in Kandahar.

When will they ever learn, oh, when will they ever learn?
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
What if nobody agreed to take part ???

I think war is old and outdated and there are many ways to settle difference without destruction of people and nations.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
What if nobody agreed to take part ???

I think war is old and outdated and there are many ways to settle difference without destruction of people and nations.

It would be nice but will never happen as we are programmed to attack and kill as a defense mechanism dating back to cave days.
 

Johnnny

Frontiersman
Jun 8, 2007
9,388
124
63
Third rock from the Sun
Someone did say "War is Hell"- be nice if it was just unnecessary.

general tecumseh sherman

he is right though and especially when he said the quote, getting injured back then was a hell of a messy business...

war is still hell, with our UAV's, phospurus bombs, depleted uranium shells....:-?

in the case of when the quote was said also, war was neceassry to keep the country together
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
What if nobody agreed to take part ???

I think war is old and outdated and there are many ways to settle difference without destruction of people and nations.

The problem is how does a peace-loving nation respond to aggression? Do other peace-loving peoples just ignore it and shake their heads/wag their fingers at the aggressors? How are countries going to resolve disputes given that in most cases armed conflict is an extension of diplomacy?

Getting rid of armed conflict is pretty much an all or nothing deal: everyone has to agree or it can't happen.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
Wow I sure got into this one feet first!!!

I am merely thinking of a sane way to settle conflict - not as the U.N. "pretends" to do with their high paid lavish lifestyles we all pay for - but let's demand the political leaders of nations declare war on each other and have meetings with the two (or whatever number) nations involved in whatever problem has occurred and resolve it financially, or economically, or with assistance in manpower or or or or...

There has to be a more humane way of solution than dropping bombs and gutting humans. A domestic protective soldiering force can be trained for those who wish to receive paid education or other benefits and training from joining this group - but they would remain within their own nation protecting the borders and the natural resources within. They would also supplement local groups when a disaster occurs such as an earthquake or flood. It would be more "helping ourselves" than wiping out strangers to settle something in which we have no vested interest - but only serve the "governmental needs" whatever the flavor of their month is.

We still act like we live in the trees.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
lol JellyBeeen would snivel about how the Yanks do Christmas if it was Christmas. Hell, he'd probably think the States should be nuked if an American farted near him.
Of course it would be nice if people quit killing each other. Ain't gonna happen. A lot of the people that the US fights against are also not particularly nice. IMO, it evens out. In JellyBeeen's apparent opinion, the whole planet's woes are because of the USA.
 

Curiosity

Senate Member
Jul 30, 2005
7,326
138
63
California
AnnaG

If I am to make the wild assumption Nora Eisenberg of Alternet is of Jewish Heritage I wonder what her opinion would have been on the U.S. entering WWII
(under criticism and duress until the bombing in Hawaii). Her omission is
screaming the question...The U.S. had no intention of becoming part of that
world war - in fact many American men went to Canada to be trained to fight
in Europe.

What about the State of Israel - do they not have a vested interest in the U.S.
assisting them in the ongoing wars in the middle east?

Had anyone asked me there would have been no military missions starting with
the original "Iraq" war after 9/11. The middle east needs to solve their own problems or we will have a protectorate situation til He** freezes.
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
All we have to do is remember those who made the Ultimate Sacrifice and that those Veterans who are still fighting their wars are taken care of.

Anything else we must remember is secondary..
 

gopher

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2005
21,513
66
48
Minnesota: Gopher State
I think we should also remember that much of those conflicts were totally unnecessary and that many died in vain. I say that not to be a spoiler of any kind but to set the facts straight.
 

JBeee

Time Out
Jun 1, 2007
1,826
52
48
Serving the Empire, Killing for Lies
[FONT=Arial,Geneva,sans-serif]by [/FONT][FONT=Arial,Geneva,sans-serif]Sheldon Richman[/FONT], [FONT=Arial,Geneva,sans-serif]June 3, 2010[/FONT]

[FONT=Times,Times New Roman]
We made it through another Memorial Day. Thankfully, most people think of it as just the start of summer. They don’t seem to use it as America’s political leaders have long wanted: as a day of reverence for America’s world domination.

In his radio address this past Saturday President Obama urged all Americans to “serve” the members of the armed forces “as well as they served us.” He called on us to remember the 5,400 Americans “who laid down their lives in defense of their fellow citizens” in Iraq and Afghanistan. He assured us that “the men and women serving this country around the world have the support they need to achieve their missions and come home safely” (emphasis added).

He also praised every war in American history as a hallowed effort to protect the nation.

Once again an American president lies to sanctify war.

Some questions should be obvious: how exactly are the armed forces today serving us or the country? And what are those men and women of the military doing “around the world”? Why didn’t Obama mention the hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, Afghans, and Pakistanis killed by American forces in the latest operations?

Don’t say that American forces are protecting us. Those troops may be serving the government and the “private” component of the military-industrial complex, but that has nothing to do with average Americans, who would be far safer — not to mention richer — if the trillion dollars spent every year on military-related matters were simply left in the taxpayers’ pockets.

It is way past time that the American people started seeing through the nonsense. That isn’t rocket science. Consider recent events:

Fact 1: The U.S. government is using robot Predator planes to shoot Hellfire missiles into Pakistan (and Afghanistan). Innocent men, women, and children are being killed or maimed regularly.

Fact 2: A Pakistani-American tries to blow up a car in Times Square.

How much effort does it take to connect those two dots? Can we really comfort ourselves by thinking that Faisal Shahzad was just a fanatical Muslim — counseled and trained by bad guys “over there” — bent on killing innocent Americans because he hates our way of life?

You have to be a damned fool to keep believing such balderdash.

Presidents and secretaries of State want us to believe that the U.S. government (which they conflate with “the country”) did nothing to provoke the crimes known as “terrorism,” which they then use to excuse all manner of violence and violations of liberty. (Strangely, Predator attacks don’t meet the official definition of “terrorism.”) But the facts refuting that ridiculous claim are readily available. Any curious American — an oxymoron? — can easily find out just how much U.S. regimes have done to create hostility and a desire for revenge in the hearts of Muslims. Start with the CIA operation in Iran in 1953.

The apologists for U.S. policy will say it was all done for peace, democracy, and prosperity.

Then why does it always bring war, death, broken bodies, torture, misery, starvation, and disease? The war planners are not stupid. They see the results. They know what they are doing.

Then they dupe others — too willing to be duped — into following orders and rationalizing their acts as necessary to national security.

Maybe this deadly con will never cease, but if it does it will be because we finally refused to pay respect to those who lead and fight the wars. We will have stopped believing that dying and killing for the empire is noble. In the movie The Americanization of Emily, screenwriter Paddy Chayefsky has his protagonist say, “We shall never end wars ... by blaming it on ministers and generals or warmongering imperialists or all the other banal bogies. It’s the rest of us who build statues to those generals and name boulevards after those ministers, the rest of us who make heroes of our dead and shrines of our battlefields. We wear our widows’ weeds like nuns and perpetuate war by exalting its sacrifices.... May be ministers and generals who blunder us into wars, but the least the rest of us can do is to resist honoring the institution.”

Remember that next Memorial Day.
[/FONT]
 

ironsides

Executive Branch Member
Feb 13, 2009
8,583
60
48
United States
We must also remember that there are people in this world who just don't mean anything to anybody. Their lives, their thoughts their very existence.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
We must also remember that there are people in this world who just don't mean anything to anybody. Their lives, their thoughts their very existence.

Yep, it's kind of sad some people are just so overwhelmed with their own well being that as long as they have all the comforts of life, as far as anyone else is concerned it's the proverbial "F you Jack, I'm alright". :-:)-(
 

The Old Medic

Council Member
May 16, 2010
1,330
2
38
The World
Each and every one of the service men and women going to Iraq and/or Afghanistan are volunteers.

Unlike Vietnam, where I served, when almost 40 percent of the soldiers were draftees.

Frankly, I would rather see a system where nobody gets government subsidized college, government subsidized home loans, nobody gets to vote, unless they have done a period of Federal Service.

No person can hold any elective office unless they have done at least one period of MILITARY service. No member of the military can vote in any election while they are serving however, only after discharge.

NOTE: Note Federal Service does NOT necessarily mean military service! However, if one volunteers for Federal Service (and it would be 100% volunteer), they can be assigned to Military Service, or to any other service, depending on the needs of the country.

Those that do serve in Military Service, and complete a term (or their next of kin if they die on active duty or as a result of that service) should be granted a full ride scholarship to any College or University that they can qualify for, to obtain as high a degree as they are capable of earning. Tuition, books, expenses and living expenses to any and all that complete a set period of military service.

Everyone else that does a term of Federal Service may utilize government subsidies (as can all military veterans) and they earn the right to vote.

The one advantage of this system is that 100% of the voters would be people that have demonstrated that they put the needs of the country first. Those that serve as elected officials would all have placed their life in service to that country, before holding office.

This is NOT my idea alone. Read the book "Starship Troopers" by Robert Anson Heinlein for details.