lunar wane shaft!!!! LOL
I had one of these but I torqued out the bindle rollers and the sledge pump seized.
I had one of these but I torqued out the bindle rollers and the sledge pump seized.
... and so far, humans seem to be suicidal.What children? The "green" movement is a genocidal movement.
Read Thomas Gold.Show me the chemistry for creating the long chain hydrocarbons without biologic mechanisms involved.
What is that supposed to prove? His "theory" hinges upon petroleum being readily available throughout the galaxy. How would we know whether it is or not? Was any found on the moon? Mars?Read Thomas Gold.
They are 500km apartWhat is that supposed to prove? His "theory" hinges upon petroleum being readily available throughout the galaxy. How would we know whether it is or not? Was any found on the moon? Mars?
Petroleum
Do you think that the tar sands in Alberta are only coincidentally in roughly the same location as Drumheller's fossils?
... and how big is Canada? How big is AB? Seems to me that a lot of Drumheller's fossils were found from the NWT all the way to the States.They are 500km apart
Drumheller is a town. Palliser and a geologist named Dr. Hector recorded the first fossils in 1859.... and how big is Canada? How big is AB? Seems to me that a lot of Drumheller's fossils were found from the NWT all the way to the States.
Uh, yeah. It has a museum full of fossils. You think those all came from Drumheller? Seems to me, fossils in the Tyrell Museum came from a variety of places around Alberta.Drumheller is a town.
So?Palliser and a geologist named Dr. Hector recorded the first fossils in 1859.
They maybe close together but are two completely different geological formations 20 million of years apart with completely different fossil taxonomy.Uh, yeah. It has a museum full of fossils. You think those all came from Drumheller? Seems to me, fossils in the Tyrell Museum came from a variety of places around Alberta. So?
You are saying that it is just a coincidence that fossils and the tar sands are in the same region and petroleum isn't a product of ancient critters and plants?
Oh..They maybe close together but are two completely different geological formations 20 million of years apart with completely different fossil taxonomy.
That's so.
Dead critters do not always mean oil. Limestone corals are fossils that are purly calcium carbonates like shellfish and corals like in the Himalayas others, like some dino bones are fossilized as silicates through a process called permineralization. other fossils are just impressions in mud, clay or sand and some bones are preserved in their natural state. Some fossils are still flesh and bone like the mamoths of Siberia in the permafrost.Well if oil and dead critters being in the same region is more than a coincidence (I'm thinking miracle here), then why don't we find oil in places where there weren't lots of critters; the Himalayas, Antarctic, for instance?
Yeah and that is just a tiny tiny slice of time at 200 million years. You'll find ocean fossils in eastern AB and land fossils in middle AB and ridiculously old Cambrian water fossils billions of years old in the west.BTW, the exhibits in the Tyrell Museum span from the Cretaceous period to the Jurassic period, if I remember correctly. 20 million years is about a quarter of that span.
Anna you entire speal was that because Drumheller is AB and tar sands were AB and there is fossils it's connected but that's okay it's not a competition.So you still aren't saying anything that refutes what I said. And that was that it isn't a coincidence that regionss with oil also happen to have fossils lying around, too.
It kind of points away from the idea that oil is produced by rocks rather than ancient critters and the forces of physics.
You can get methane in minutes but petroleum takes heat and immense pressure and once again aneorbic conditions hence the name "fossil fuels" rather than paleo fuels.