Can a good Christian be a good Canadian?
I am going to define a ‘good’ Christian the same way as the religious right defines a ‘good’ Muslim. Both the definitions are nonsense, but turnabout is fair play.
Theologically – no.
Because his allegiance is to Jesus, a form of the Hindu God Vishnu (or perhaps as Spade would claim, Horus).
Religiously – no
Because no other religion is accepted by his Jesus except Christianity.
Scripturally – no
Because his allegiance is to Jesus and the Christian Trinity (Father, Son and Holy ghost) first, to the government of the day second.
Geographically – no
Because his allegiance is to Bethlehem and to the cross.
Socially – no.
Because his religion forbids him to treat homosexuals, witches, women or non Christians as his equals in any respect.
Politically – no.
His allegiance is to Christ first, to the laws and regulations of the nation second. His theology tells him that if a law is in conflict with Bible, it is his duty to disobey the law. That is why we see Christians bombing abortion clinics, killing abortion performing doctors, resorting to gay bashing etc.
Intellectually – no
Because he cannot accept Canadian constitution which proclaims that all the human beings are equal (while in his theology, he is clearly superior to women, to homosexuals, to witches etc.).
Spiritually – no.
Because when the Charter declares that all human beings are equal, that gays must be allowed to marry, that there can be no restrictions on abortion, his Christian God, who is a zealous God, frowns down upon the Canadian constitution and so also does the ‘good’ Christian.
Therefore, after much study and deliberation....
perhaps we should be Very suspicious of AL CHRISTIANS
in this country. - - - They obviously Cannot be both
’good' Christians and good Canadians.
Call it what you wish
it's still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who
understand This, the better it will be for our country and our future.
I am going to define a ‘good’ Christian the same way as the religious right defines a ‘good’ Muslim. Both the definitions are nonsense, but turnabout is fair play.
Theologically – no.
Because his allegiance is to Jesus, a form of the Hindu God Vishnu (or perhaps as Spade would claim, Horus).
Religiously – no
Because no other religion is accepted by his Jesus except Christianity.
Scripturally – no
Because his allegiance is to Jesus and the Christian Trinity (Father, Son and Holy ghost) first, to the government of the day second.
Geographically – no
Because his allegiance is to Bethlehem and to the cross.
Socially – no.
Because his religion forbids him to treat homosexuals, witches, women or non Christians as his equals in any respect.
Politically – no.
His allegiance is to Christ first, to the laws and regulations of the nation second. His theology tells him that if a law is in conflict with Bible, it is his duty to disobey the law. That is why we see Christians bombing abortion clinics, killing abortion performing doctors, resorting to gay bashing etc.
Intellectually – no
Because he cannot accept Canadian constitution which proclaims that all the human beings are equal (while in his theology, he is clearly superior to women, to homosexuals, to witches etc.).
Spiritually – no.
Because when the Charter declares that all human beings are equal, that gays must be allowed to marry, that there can be no restrictions on abortion, his Christian God, who is a zealous God, frowns down upon the Canadian constitution and so also does the ‘good’ Christian.
Therefore, after much study and deliberation....
perhaps we should be Very suspicious of AL CHRISTIANS
in this country. - - - They obviously Cannot be both
’good' Christians and good Canadians.
Call it what you wish
it's still the truth. You had better believe it. The more who
understand This, the better it will be for our country and our future.
Last edited: