Well, I thank you :smile:That's a pretty good description Risus. I'm proud of ya.
Well, I thank you :smile:That's a pretty good description Risus. I'm proud of ya.
I can appreciate your outrage, on any day, however I am a little hesitant to support your suggestion as a solution to the problem.Yup.
Well, I was angry at the time. I've since calmed down and I can assure you I wouldn't drench anyone in naplam and light them up. I've heard the Chinese don't treat prisoners as well as the US treats suspected terrorists. Same with the N. Koreans.I can appreciate your outrage, on any day, however I am a little hesitant to support your suggestion as a solution to the problem.
"If it were up to me, I'd drench each and every stupid SOB in napalm and light em up!"
Execution would be better for everybody rather than prison where corruption might lessen their punishment , and it's cheaper..... why Chinese over Gitmo like facilities?
Reread my first post about the issue. It says, "I just heard it on the news that insurgents hit a Pakistani school and killed 3 kids and 3 US soldiers on a training mission.
What in the FµCK is the matter with those assholes doing a training mission at a school and WTF is the matter with those assholes that bombed the school!! If it were up to me, I'd drench each and every stupid SOB in napalm and light em up!
I think absolutely everyone involved with having soldiers near schools should be convicted of war crimes and spend the rest of their scummy lives in a Chinese jail."
If they didn't want kids getting killed because of their presence and they had any smarts they wouldn't have gone near where kids would be.
Yeah, and I was angry when I posted it. And at the time I posted it, the news was that the military was doing a training mission at the school. Now it is apparent that they were just driving by the school. If it were me, they would not be near schools in the first place.I did read that and I just informed you that it was not like they were having a training mission at the school. It was a convoy that was rammed by a car and the blast killed nearby children.
Yup. Because, IMO, if one is military and does not want civilians to be killed because one is a target, it makes sense to not go near civilians.You blame the soldiers just as much and call them stupid.
Well, I applaud your self-control.I was once one of those "neanderthal grunts" and I am biting my tongue a lot.
I know.And normally I have a lot of respect for some miltary personnel, but I sure have none for those military personnel.There isn't much I can say about that without dragging this in the mud and I don't want to do that with you. You're on my buddy list remember.
Then why not plan their routes in those places rather than where kids might possibly get killed because of "collateral damage"?Honesty Anna...how the heck did they know a guy was going to ram them there. How many schools in the town? Markets? Housing? Hospitals? You know if it was up to the soldiers they'd rather duke it out in the hills and wastelands.
Why do they choose those areas? It couldn't be that one of the reasons is because their enemy wanders around in these areas, could it? I know they are indiscriminate, but I also know they like to target opposing military.The insurgents like to set off IEDs and car bombs in populated areas.
Still spreading hate, huh? What's the diff between someone like you and someone like Zundel or anyone else spewing hatred for a certain group of people?The only encouraging out-come to this story is the fact three US soldiers got killed.
A shame the kids were taken but hey, not a bad score when you compare the number of innocents that die vs `enemy` from US air-strikes.
Still spreading hate, huh? What's the diff between someone like you and someone like Zundel or anyone else spewing hatred for a certain group of people?
I dislike the yanks, but I certainly wouldn't go that far. You are disgusting.The only encouraging out-come to this story is the fact three US soldiers got killed.
Nope. But then I think that because those 10 kids may be spared is incidental to your hatred of Americans. And your numbers are off. How many US soldiers were there? Lots. How many kids were killed? 3.The way I see it, with every dead US soldier, 10 or more children over there may live to see adulthood. Is that a bad thing to hope for?
Putting it on credit is not really buying, it probably also get you the cheapest and lest safe products they have (by your choice since the ones that pay their bills). All they would have to do is blockade themselves for 6 months and North America would be empty of people.
I dislike the yanks, but I certainly wouldn't go that far. You are disgusting.
How many kids were there?Nope. But then I think that because those 10 kids may be spared is incidental to your hatred of Americans. And your numbers are off. How many US soldiers were there? Lots. How many kids were killed? 3.
Why it's almost like magic.People are paying cash these days, the credit industry has dropped considerably in the past 3 months. Yet sales of stuff keep going on and on.
Altogether or just that one incident?How many kids were there?
Don't you like Doug Rokke's version of the dangers?
Do a google image seach for "du birth defects"