Fat Kids

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
Egg white omelette is a typical soulless, tastless, bland politically (but NOT nutritionally) correct status symbol.

An omelette without yolk is like a day without sunshine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Unlike previous generations, kids today almost all grow up in dual income families. Parents have less time (or energy) to make dinner, thus fast food is a staple. Also, kids once had to visit friends to socialize. Today they chat on Facebook.
That's what grandparents are for.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
In other words, it's up to the parents and the kids themselves to decide to eat healthily.

We're back to the original point: people who are overweight are that way because they eat too much, and too much of the wrong foods. It's not my fault, it's not TV's fault, it's not the government's fault.

Much as with an alcoholic, until the "victim" wants to change, and does so willingly, nothing will change.

Are you a 'victim', or a 'volunteer'??
Yup. In spite of societal pressures for convenience and consuming goods, people can still eat healthily.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
"Have you tried an egg white omelet?" Yep, and I found it be to be quite tasteless and lacking character and overall nutrition.

Have you tried cooking whole, real eggs in the healthiest way possible? Here's a tip for you...take a couple of eggs from chickens that were fed properly (grains, a bit of chicken scratch out in nature). Boil some water in a pot. Crack the eggs and put them in a bowl. Add a couple of dashes of vinegar to the water and bring it to a boil. Slide the eggs in and cook at a gentle boil for around 2.5 minutes. Remove them with a slotted spoon and eat. Simple, eh?

Here is the payoff...because you boiled them in water, the temperature of those yolks didn't go over 100 C. And that means the fat in them didn't turn to artery-clogging stuff, like it would if you had fried them. The bottom of a hot frying pan is much, much hotter than the boiling water and thus, will transform the fat in the egg yolks to near-lethal stuff. You can do the same thing with the shells on if you prefer, if you remember to add vinegar to the boiling water...that helps the shell to come away from the cooked white of the egg much easier.

I used to eat raw eggs regularly in Japan (a dish called sukiyaki calls for them to be used as a dipping sauce) and that avoided the nasty heat treatment completely. But, I'm a bit more careful about that here...I think we treat our food with less respect and I don't always know how old that egg really is here.

Anyway, there's your "good eatin' tip of the day" - enjoy those eggs! They won't hurt you if you treat 'em right.

yes, eggs have had a bad rap, I stopped eating egg yolks
for a while because my cholestrol was elevated, then after
a while learned that the whole egg is healthy, no need to
dismiss the yolk, in fact we all are dismissing too much
saturated fats, we need some each day, but not trans fat.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
You can get healthy fast food even at McDonald’s (or indeed, Wendy’s, almost any fast food place), JLM. These days they have many types of salads, apple slices etc. McDonald’s is not just hamburger and French fries any more.
If you want to call Frankenfoods, irradiated foods, tasteless foods, etc. healthy, I suppose you could call it healthy. Quality wise, that stuff sucks, though.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Eggs were bad, now they're good. Bread was good, then it was bad, then it was good again. Smoked meat causes cancer ... then it didn't. Coffee was bad, then it's good. Wine was bad ... then it's good.... Butter was good, then bad, then good again. Margarine was good, now it's bad ... unless it's Becel.... Maybe if we had a few less scientists mucking with the menu, McDonalds wouldn't look like such an alternative
 
Last edited:

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
"Have you tried an egg white omelet?" Yep, and I found it be to be quite tasteless and lacking character and overall nutrition.

Have you tried cooking whole, real eggs in the healthiest way possible?

Here I disagree with you, countryboy. Egg white is very healthy, rich in proteins, low in calories, no fat. The egg yolk on the other hand, while it does contain proteins, also contains fat and is one of the richest source of cholesterol known to humankind. Nutritionists recommend not eating more than say ten eggs per week, and that is because of the cholesterol in egg yolk. If you only eat the whites, you may eat six eggs a day and no harm done.

And you found egg white omelet tasteless probably because it was not prepared properly. And there is no way it was lacking in overall nutrition. As I said, egg white is nutrition and nothing else. Egg yolk is nutrition plus fat plus a big wallop of cholesterol.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
That is easy, countryboy. 'Healthy' means salads, apple slices etc. which you can get at McDonald's. And don't take my word for it, visit the nearest McDonald's and see for yourself. They also will give you the information about additives, calories etc. (though I don't think there are any additives in salads or apple slices).
Wait till you are in the loo and see one of the employees leave without washing hands.
 

Francis2004

Subjective Poster
Nov 18, 2008
2,846
34
48
Lower Mainland, BC
"Have you tried an egg white omelet?" Yep, and I found it be to be quite tasteless and lacking character and overall nutrition.

Have you tried cooking whole, real eggs in the healthiest way possible? Here's a tip for you...take a couple of eggs from chickens that were fed properly (grains, a bit of chicken scratch out in nature). Boil some water in a pot. Crack the eggs and put them in a bowl. Add a couple of dashes of vinegar to the water and bring it to a boil. Slide the eggs in and cook at a gentle boil for around 2.5 minutes. Remove them with a slotted spoon and eat. Simple, eh?

Here is the payoff...because you boiled them in water, the temperature of those yolks didn't go over 100 C. And that means the fat in them didn't turn to artery-clogging stuff, like it would if you had fried them. The bottom of a hot frying pan is much, much hotter than the boiling water and thus, will transform the fat in the egg yolks to near-lethal stuff. You can do the same thing with the shells on if you prefer, if you remember to add vinegar to the boiling water...that helps the shell to come away from the cooked white of the egg much easier.

I used to eat raw eggs regularly in Japan (a dish called sukiyaki calls for them to be used as a dipping sauce) and that avoided the nasty heat treatment completely. But, I'm a bit more careful about that here...I think we treat our food with less respect and I don't always know how old that egg really is here.

Anyway, there's your "good eatin' tip of the day" - enjoy those eggs! They won't hurt you if you treat 'em right.

Your right CB.. My Dad, when he and I were young, used to drink an egg in milk.

Later in life I did the same but gave it up when all heck broke lose on eggs being bad for you..

You broke an egg in a glass of milk and stirred it up.. The first time you drank it it was not that great to taste but sure did the job for a fast breakfast..

Ever hear or try it ?
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
lone wolf, I could not agree with you more:

"Eggs were bad, now they're good. Bread was good, then it was bad, then it was good again. Smoked meat causes cancer ... then it didn't. Coffee was bad, then it's good. Wine was bad ... then it's good.... Maybe if we had a few less scientists mucking with the menu, McDonalds wouldn't look like such an alternative."

In our fast-paced world scientists (real or just politically correct) know that it is the matter of "Publish or Perish".

So, if the current conventional says that eggs are bad, they will publish a "study", "proving" that eggs are good. Or butter. Or bread. Or red meat. Or any number of other foods.

No doubt, sometimes in the future McDonalds will be fully exonerated.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I think restaurants years ago were all right when they were a place where one would take his family for a special outing. They have never been a substitute for proper home cooked meals.
Yeah, my Dad remembers eating at restaurants that used to have their own gardens out back, and some even had their own livestock.
I have yet to have someone tell me that McDonald's and the others use real healthy foods in their restaurants. I am almost positive that what they have in their salads is irradiated or GE-ed for something, or both. I'll pass, I love nature too much to mess with what it offers (except hybridising it).
 

Francis2004

Subjective Poster
Nov 18, 2008
2,846
34
48
Lower Mainland, BC
Eggs were bad, now they're good. Bread was good, then it was bad, then it was good again. Smoked meat causes cancer ... then it didn't. Coffee was bad, then it's good. Wine was bad ... then it's good.... Butter was goog, then bad, then good again. Margarine was good, now it's bad ... unless it's Becel.... Maybe if we had a few less scientists mucking with the menu, McDonalds wouldn't look like such an alternative

Yes LW, we hear that all the time.. To TenPenny point of moderation comes good advice..

If we were to live by these statements we would die of stress alone..
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
"
A good start might be to include a basic course on it in elementary school and continue it right through high school. "Spaced repetition" works, if it's done in an interesting way. It's just one thought...

I think the knowledge is already available, I assume they do teach courses in nutrition in high school (if they don’t you are right, they ought to). The problem is putting the knowledge into practice, that is easier said than done.
 
Last edited:

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
Look, I have never bought salad or apple slices form McDonald’s. As I said before, I only go to McDonald for their coffee. Besides, I think it is a ripoff anyway, to charge 2 or 3 dollars for apple slices, when an apple could be bought for 40 or 50 cents in the store next door.

Since I have no intention of buying salad or apple slices from them, I did not really investigate as to what these things actually contain, I am only saying here what they say. If the information is wrong, I couldn’t care less.

But if you want my definition of ‘healthy’, here it is. Healthy means low in calories, high in nutrition and a product as close to nature as it is possible. Some examples of healthy products are oatmeal, fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, cottage cheese, egg white etc. Have you tried an egg white omelet?

"If the information is wrong, I couldn’t care less."

That may be the reason why we have Fat Kids. Perhaps we're assuming that because the breakfast cereal box says "healthy" or "contains fruit" or other such nonsense, we think we're eatin' good.

I mentioned in earlier posts that "education" might be the key to the whole thing. And before we all jump to conclusions about what I mean by that, I am NOT talking about lecturing fat people on the need to eat less and exercise more.

What I am talking about is taking this entire subject of food, sorting it all out right down to the basics, and then coming up with a way to get the message across about how eating has a direct impact on health, not just weight gain or loss, although that's one of the indicators that something might be going wrong.

It's hard for the average consumer - who is busy and has little time to shop, cook, or read exhaustive articles on nutrition - to understand this "you are what you eat" thing. Add to that all the low fat, low carb, low this, low that, advertising that comes our way every day and you have a recipe for disaster. Misinformation and far too much of it is a bad thing.

So, I'm saying the challenge is to get the message (you are what you eat) across in a way that works. I am making the assumption that most people are smart and will respond to that "message", if it's created and presented effectively. The creating and presenting is the hard part though...I don't have the magic answers but they're out there somewhere.

A good start might be to include a basic course on it in elementary school and continue it right through high school. "Spaced repetition" works, if it's done in an interesting way. It's just one thought...
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
You are right - it is too simplistic to believe that if fat people just stop eating so much, obesity will end because that's never going to happen. It's very hard work to lose weight and it's considerably harder for women then it is for men. It also seems to be harder for men to diet on their own. If I choose the foods (if my husband has stated that he wants to lose weight and agrees that he will eat what I prepare) he will lose weight rapidly where I will lose but I will lose at a considerably slower rate than he does. For the amount of groceries I pack and lift in a day, you would think my arms should be muscular and my hands slim. I am strong but I am not muscular and my hands appear heavier than other over-weight people I see. I've never figured out why some women have very slim hands but very fat bodies. My weight is proportional all over. I admit that I envy my husband in that he can lose weight so quickly for one thing and that he has me to prepare the food for him. I wish I had someone (aside from myself) who would go to the trouble for me. He cooks but he leaves for work and he loads my plate up fit for a man and he's a little hurt if he comes home and asks me if I ate it all!! I've asked over and over for him to put half on my plate what he puts on his. Mindless eating comes into play again as I sit down with my plate beside me and check my email and these pages. What I will start doing is clearing off the excess amount (I only sit down to the computer at dinner if he's at work) before I sit down so I won't have the mindless eating. I think I've come up with a way to help myself but I'll have to see how that goes before I blab about it.

we are the opposite here, I can lose weight as soon as I
serve myself smaller portions, where my husband (italian)
holds his fat longer, that's just how people are, but it
still remains that the portions must be smaller if one is
to lose weight/size, weight doesn't necessarily come down
if you are eating less and excercising, as size can come
down considerably, but one is gaining muscle, which is
heavier than fat. He will get smaller eventually, he
needs to move around more, he isn't one to do that, unless
he is doing something he enjoys, but it won't be planned
excercise, but he will walk up on the mountain while hunting, or walk while golfing, but won't walk for 'nothing'. I love to walk long distances.
There is no other way to get smaller and lose weight than
eating less, eating better and excercising, so people must zero in on that concept, instead of dancing around it.
And, if people are eating because of 'other' problems in
their lives, it still comes down to the fact, that eventually when they decide to address their weight problem
the must eat less, eat right and excercise.
Moving the body by doing something vigorous, makes the
mind happier, once a person gets past their own hatred of
doing 'something' to care for their bodies.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I quote you here.. A "proper home cooked meals"..

That is also a main issue in our society.. How many get proper cooked meals at home and eat at proper times..

Most kids I know have no set times for eating and snack all day..
What are the "proper" times for eating?
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
Your right CB.. My Dad, when he and I were young, used to drink an egg in milk.

Later in life I did the same but gave it up when all heck broke lose on eggs being bad for you..

You broke an egg in a glass of milk and stirred it up.. The first time you drank it it was not that great to taste but sure did the job for a fast breakfast..

Ever hear or try it ?

Oh sure. In fact, it was a great recipe for a "morning after" drink if one had a nasty hangover. We used to stir a raw egg into a glass of tomato juice back in the country and just "drink 'er down"...it worked (if you could keep it down!)...

It's not unusual in Japan for people to drink/eat a raw egg or two if they're feeling a bit "poorly." They believe that eggs really are "nature's perfect food" but they haven't been as bombarded with all the "yes, they're good" and "no, they're not" studies that we have seen over the years. Here's hoping they never do.

By the way, an interesting tidbit...eggs sold in supermarkets in Japan are never refrigerated. They see no need for it, as it comes in its own protective container...the shell.
 

Francis2004

Subjective Poster
Nov 18, 2008
2,846
34
48
Lower Mainland, BC
"If the information is wrong, I couldn’t care less."

That may be the reason why we have Fat Kids. Perhaps we're assuming that because the breakfast cereal box says "healthy" or "contains fruit" or other such nonsense, we think we're eatin' good.

I mentioned in earlier posts that "education" might be the key to the whole thing. And before we all jump to conclusions about what I mean by that, I am NOT talking about lecturing fat people on the need to eat less and exercise more.

What I am talking about is taking this entire subject of food, sorting it all out right down to the basics, and then coming up with a way to get the message across about how eating has a direct impact on health, not just weight gain or loss, although that's one of the indicators that something might be going wrong.

It's hard for the average consumer - who is busy and has little time to shop, cook, or read exhaustive articles on nutrition - to understand this "you are what you eat" thing. Add to that all the low fat, low carb, low this, low that, advertising that comes our way every day and you have a recipe for disaster. Misinformation and far too much of it is a bad thing.

So, I'm saying the challenge is to get the message (you are what you eat) across in a way that works. I am making the assumption that most people are smart and will respond to that "message", if it's created and presented effectively. The creating and presenting is the hard part though...I don't have the magic answers but they're out there somewhere.

A good start might be to include a basic course on it in elementary school and continue it right through high school. "Spaced repetition" works, if it's done in an interesting way. It's just one thought...

CB, it maybe hard for the average consumer to do all those things but when your life or your child's life depends on it, you do it..

Reading the "ingredients table" is not harder or time consuming then reading the "Healthy" logo and blabber on the front..

Like I said earlier I read all those now and still get all my shopping done in the same time I used to.. It's all in what priority you look at life with.. Also, after a few times of looking at the tables, you get to know which is healthier and need not look so often..

Education is key and always has been.. If people think they came out of school and had learned everything they had fooled themselves.. I don't think there is any aspect in life that we need not keep educating ourselves..
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
Eggs were bad, now they're good. Bread was good, then it was bad, then it was good again. Smoked meat causes cancer ... then it didn't. Coffee was bad, then it's good. Wine was bad ... then it's good.... Butter was goog, then bad, then good again. Margarine was good, now it's bad ... unless it's Becel.... Maybe if we had a few less scientists mucking with the menu, McDonalds wouldn't look like such an alternative
Your post is the easiest to respond to. It's to the point. Lots of eggs are not the best thing for you. Like anything, they are fine in moderation. I don't like them much anyway. However, one egg yolk contains about 7 - 8 grams of fat so for a woman, eating two eggs (whole) in a day is almost the full fat count one should have. All vinegar does to an egg is make the whites very white. Bread is good too providing it's whole grain and again - moderation! I've watched my hubby eat 6 slices in one sitting. The mere thought makes me gag. I hate lunch meat (smoked meat). I like coffee - up to two cups each morning. No more. Hate wine. Rarely eat butter or margarine unless it's cooked into something. MacDonald's an alternative? If it was the only place to eat as we passed through a town. Can't stand the smell of A & W, food at BK is gross as well. We do go to Wendy's now and again but there are times (like now) that even the thought is UGH! Bad home food is things that are easy like a grilled cheese sandwich. Might as well go to Rotten Ronnie's. Not too bad is a poached egg on dry toast. But not daily. (add the vinegar to the water and it turns the white of the egg to snow white).