Fat Kids

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Big deal, why patronize a place that makes most of its profits killing people?


You may not like McDonald’s JLM, but it happens to be very popular. I myself go into McDonald’s only occasionally, for the coffee. They have great coffee and free refills.

However, many people seem to like their food, and not only here in Canada or USA. McDonald’s is everywhere. When we visited Galapagos Islands this year, we saw McDonald’s in Quito and Guayaquil, the two biggest cities in Ecuador. They are in India, in China almost everywhere in the world.

They won’t be that popular unless they are doing something right. Maybe they serve mostly junk food, but people like it, that is how private enterprise works.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
I understand that perspective. I agree that the reason for overeating has to be overcome or at least avoided, but it is not the cause. Your perspective is simply one way to deny responsibility for anything that happens.

It's not my fault that I'm fat/an alcoholic/a child abuser; it's always someone else's. Never take personal responsibility for any aspect of your life, there's always someone to blame. That way, you don't have to take any responsibility for changing your situation in life. That's the whole point of that thought process: you don't ever have to feel that you have failed at anything, because you are never responsible for anything.

As I mentioned a few posts back, that is also my take on
the situation, and I fully agree with you.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
You may not like McDonald’s JLM, but it happens to be very popular. I myself go into McDonald’s only occasionally, for the coffee. They have great coffee and free refills.

However, many people seem to like their food, and not only here in Canada or USA. McDonald’s is everywhere. When we visited Galapagos Islands this year, we saw McDonald’s in Quito and Guayaquil, the two biggest cities in Ecuador. They are in India, in China almost everywhere in the world.

They won’t be that popular unless they are doing something right. Maybe they serve mostly junk food, but people like it, that is how private enterprise works.

So ... you condone addiction for profit?
 

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
11
Aether Island
I think restaurants years ago were all right when they were a place where one would take his family for a special outing. They have never been a substitute for proper home cooked meals.

When I was a kid on the windswept plains, a restaurant meal included soup, and a choice of jello, rice pudding, or caramel pudding for dessert, all for less than a buck.
 

Francis2004

Subjective Poster
Nov 18, 2008
2,846
34
48
Lower Mainland, BC
Healthy kids and healthy people come from a lot more then properly cooked foods..

As VanIsle started this OP with comments about parents buying stuff for home and their kids, how many pay attention to ingredients on the box ?

I literally must read EVERY BOX, CAN, BAG to ensure there is no nut product in what I give to my son.. It is amazing what you find in foods today..

And as a single working dad I don't have the option to bake from scratch..
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
You may not like McDonald’s JLM, but it happens to be very popular. I myself go into McDonald’s only occasionally, for the coffee. They have great coffee and free refills.

However, many people seem to like their food, and not only here in Canada or USA. McDonald’s is everywhere. When we visited Galapagos Islands this year, we saw McDonald’s in Quito and Guayaquil, the two biggest cities in Ecuador. They are in India, in China almost everywhere in the world.

They won’t be that popular unless they are doing something right. Maybe they serve mostly junk food, but people like it, that is how private enterprise works.

Yes, as I said before, people don't think past their mouths.
 

Francis2004

Subjective Poster
Nov 18, 2008
2,846
34
48
Lower Mainland, BC
I think restaurants years ago were all right when they were a place where one would take his family for a special outing. They have never been a substitute for proper home cooked meals.

I quote you here.. A "proper home cooked meals"..

That is also a main issue in our society.. How many get proper cooked meals at home and eat at proper times..

Most kids I know have no set times for eating and snack all day..
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
That basically sums up 99% of all restaurants..

Quite so, Francis. But only those restaurants will survive which give the customers what they want, at a price they can afford. And McDonald gives people exactly what they want, that is why they are so popular, not only in North America, but practically the world over.

But when people started demanding healthy nutritious food, McDonald got onto the wagon, and started serving salads and apple slices (for dessert). Although it is beyond me why people would pay 2 or 3 dollars for apple slices, when an apple could be had in a store for maybe 40 or 50 cents. But then there is no accounting for tastes.
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
You may not like McDonald’s JLM, but it happens to be very popular. I myself go into McDonald’s only occasionally, for the coffee. They have great coffee and free refills.

However, many people seem to like their food, and not only here in Canada or USA. McDonald’s is everywhere. When we visited Galapagos Islands this year, we saw McDonald’s in Quito and Guayaquil, the two biggest cities in Ecuador. They are in India, in China almost everywhere in the world.

They won’t be that popular unless they are doing something right. Maybe they serve mostly junk food, but people like it, that is how private enterprise works.

I'm confused...your last sentence sounds like that of an extremist right-wing Conservative, minus the religious component. Oh well...hard to tell a book by the advertising on its cover.

Speaking of advertising, that is the main reason for the success of McDonald's and others. And they do that right, for sure.

However, the one thing they do wrong is the food. By "wrong", I mean that they have taken the "cookie cutter" method of food handling to an extreme, and it's all based on the "industrial food system." That means that low cost is the driving force behind their food sources. Not nutrition, not well-being of their customers...nope, just low cost.

This low cost fixation is responsible for everything from inhumane treatment of animals to unhealthy food additives to a general lack of nutrients in their "food." Add in generous amounts of MSG - which is addictive and dangerous - and you have to perfect "success" formula. Of course, that depends on your definition of "success."

You only have to see the movie "Supersize Me" to see what this kind of diet can do to a person if they rely too much on it for their daily calories. Of course, none of it will hurt anyone if it's a "once in a while" treat. But it's not, for many...

So you are observing McDonald's around the world...nothing new. They had a corporate objective of 2,000 outlets around the world back in 1971 when I did a case study on them in biz school. They had 86 outlets in Tokyo when I moved there in 1989, and I'm sure they have many more now. That doesn't mean they're serving good food that is good for people...it means that corporate strength has worked for them, and they are good at it. But keep in mind, their mission does not include serving the best, healthiest food to people, especially kids...and I believe the topic is Fat Kids, right?
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
You didn't answer my question. I asked you to define "healthy" in terms of nutritional and additive-specific terms. Will you do that, please? I assume you're not taking the advertising at face value, are you? I mean, you are the person who stated that you require proof to believe something, so what is your proof that these fast food snacks are "healthy?" You mentioned them, so I believe the burden of proof is on your shoulders. Thank you.


Look, I have never bought salad or apple slices form McDonald’s. As I said before, I only go to McDonald for their coffee. Besides, I think it is a ripoff anyway, to charge 2 or 3 dollars for apple slices, when an apple could be bought for 40 or 50 cents in the store next door.

Since I have no intention of buying salad or apple slices from them, I did not really investigate as to what these things actually contain, I am only saying here what they say. If the information is wrong, I couldn’t care less.

But if you want my definition of ‘healthy’, here it is. Healthy means low in calories, high in nutrition and a product as close to nature as it is possible. Some examples of healthy products are oatmeal, fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, cottage cheese, egg white etc. Have you tried an egg white omelet?
 

Francis2004

Subjective Poster
Nov 18, 2008
2,846
34
48
Lower Mainland, BC
Quite so, Francis. But only those restaurants will survive which give the customers what they want, at a price they can afford. And McDonald gives people exactly what they want, that is why they are so popular, not only in North America, but practically the world over.

But when people started demanding healthy nutritious food, McDonald got onto the wagon, and started serving salads and apple slices (for dessert). Although it is beyond me why people would pay 2 or 3 dollars for apple slices, when an apple could be had in a store for maybe 40 or 50 cents. But then there is no accounting for tastes.

Well SJP, you can pay 2 dollars at McDonalds or 4 dollars at a higher class restaurant..

Service is what you pay for and if you have not figured that out yet, it is time to re-think the business world..

McDonalds or any other restaurant are not in the business of going bankrupts for anyone.. Even health food restaurants ( we have a few here in Vancouver ) that serve organic foods so called properly prepared, will cost you and arm and a leg for service..

Again you can buy the ingredients at Safeway at 1/8th the cost and make it yourself or sit down and let yourself be served at a cost.. That is the price of service.. Even McDonalds must make profit and if it comes at the expense of quality then it will for a short while until it's not profitable..
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
I did not change it countryboy, that indeed was the tenor of the discussion here until I stepped in. There seemed to be general agreement that all the fat people have to do is eat less, eat healthy and exercise. And bingo, they will turn into healthy people.

So I decided to set the cat among the pigeons by taking a contrary view. But the point is, I did not start the discussion about fat people, go back and check the thread. The discussion was already about fat people and obesity in general when I joined it.

You obviously intrepreted the discussion in your own way...If you consider the total discussion, some were pointing out the benefits of eating less and exercising, which is basic to the issue and as far as I know, quite true.

What to do about it is another issue, and it will likely move in that direction as the discussion progresses. I'm not sure how productive a cat in the pigeons is in the discussion, but hey, likely the pigeons are a good protein source for the cat, without food additives.

In fact, any self-respecting cat likely wouldn't eat much of the stuff we feed our kids as the ones I know (the cats) seem to instinctively know what's good for them and what is not. We humans could learn a thing or two from the animals...
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Oh, I really cannot think of anything, countryboy. You probably are not aware of it, but a few months ago, there were serious attempts to run me out of the forum.
There was? Whatever for? You aren't much of anything other than someone with logorrhea (Les says cacoethes loquendi)
But I am more than a match for anybody here.
That's for sure, you are rarely speechless. Concerning debating, you're a laugh.
The only way I am quitting the forum is if I decide to quit voluntarily, or if moderators kick me out.
Oh, good. I can keep pointing out where you make a fool of yourself.

But the forum has never really stopped being fun to me. I imagine if the forum becomes full of personal insults, personal abuse, where no serious issues are discussed, all we have is personal mud slinging matches, then it will stop being fun to me. But so far that hasn’t happened.
Yeah, you have your own way of abusing people alright.
If somebody insults me personally, embarks upon personal abuse, I simply stop debating them.
I'm wondering when are you going to start debating.
You may already have noticed, there are several posters who are always trying to dialog with me, without getting any response form me. So that is not a problem.
Like me, for instance. I keep pointing out your blunders so you quit chatting. lol

As for personal insults, personal abuse, if anything, the forum has got better in the past few months, the moderators have been doing an excellent job. So offhand, I really cannot think of anything that will stop it being fun here. That does not mean that I will be here the rest of my life, I may decide to quit voluntarily some day. But that day is a long way off.
Anyway, so what does all the logomania in this post have to do with the topic?
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Oh, I have got a very thick skin, JLM. A rhino or an elephant has nothing on me. And if I am not wanted here, I will leave in a flash. But the moderators must tell me to leave, I am not going to leave because some poster wants me to.
Still off-topic? Maybe someone should start reporting this habit of yours.
 

countryboy

Traditionally Progressive
Nov 30, 2009
3,686
39
48
BC
Look, I have never bought salad or apple slices form McDonald’s. As I said before, I only go to McDonald for their coffee. Besides, I think it is a ripoff anyway, to charge 2 or 3 dollars for apple slices, when an apple could be bought for 40 or 50 cents in the store next door.

Since I have no intention of buying salad or apple slices from them, I did not really investigate as to what these things actually contain, I am only saying here what they say. If the information is wrong, I couldn’t care less.

But if you want my definition of ‘healthy’, here it is. Healthy means low in calories, high in nutrition and a product as close to nature as it is possible. Some examples of healthy products are oatmeal, fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, cottage cheese, egg white etc. Have you tried an egg white omelet?

"Have you tried an egg white omelet?" Yep, and I found it be to be quite tasteless and lacking character and overall nutrition.

Have you tried cooking whole, real eggs in the healthiest way possible? Here's a tip for you...take a couple of eggs from chickens that were fed properly (grains, a bit of chicken scratch out in nature). Boil some water in a pot. Crack the eggs and put them in a bowl. Add a couple of dashes of vinegar to the water and bring it to a boil. Slide the eggs in and cook at a gentle boil for around 2.5 minutes. Remove them with a slotted spoon and eat. Simple, eh?

Here is the payoff...because you boiled them in water, the temperature of those yolks didn't go over 100 C. And that means the fat in them didn't turn to artery-clogging stuff, like it would if you had fried them. The bottom of a hot frying pan is much, much hotter than the boiling water and thus, will transform the fat in the egg yolks to near-lethal stuff. You can do the same thing with the shells on if you prefer, if you remember to add vinegar to the boiling water...that helps the shell to come away from the cooked white of the egg much easier.

I used to eat raw eggs regularly in Japan (a dish called sukiyaki calls for them to be used as a dipping sauce) and that avoided the nasty heat treatment completely. But, I'm a bit more careful about that here...I think we treat our food with less respect and I don't always know how old that egg really is here.

Anyway, there's your "good eatin' tip of the day" - enjoy those eggs! They won't hurt you if you treat 'em right.
 

VanIsle

Always thinking
Nov 12, 2008
7,046
43
48
That is a red herring, TenPenny. If somebody doesn’t take responsibility for his obesity, he will only hurt himself, nobody else.
No. I disagree with you. My son is obese. If he doesn't take responsibility soon, life could go terribly wrong and two children could be without a father and a woman without a husband.
It is my opinion that some responsibility goes toward the whole household. Particularly the grocery purchaser. If you know someone in your household has a problem, buy healthy snacks only. I certainly recognize that my son is responsible for his own health but like an alcoholic, if the food is available, he will eat it. He arrives at my house to pick up the children and the very first thing he does is check out the pantry and the fridge. If he doesn't see any "good" snacks (all a matter of each person's opinion - right?), he will even eat a peanut butter sandwich. Fine but not a half hour before dinner.

We are discussing here whether it does any good to lecture fat people, to lecture them about eating habits, nutrition, exercise etc. Whether somebody takes the responsibility for his/her obesity is up to them, you really have no control over that (neither do I). Lecturing/nagging a person is the absolute worst. I know for myself and for my son all it does is put food on your mind and then you mindlessly get up and eat. A bowl of cereal, a banana, some toast etc. It's sooo easy to say, it's just a small bowl of cereal and it is a small bowl for me. Add that to the small bowl from breakfast and it's food you don't need.

Just as not taking personal responsibility for one’s obesity is a copout, so is blaming fat people for their fatness, so is claiming that they are fat because they overeat, all they have to do is stop eating and that is that.
I can stick with a diet of the "right" foods and my biggest problem is eating a larger portion to some degree. I eat too much salad and as men, you probably wonder how that can be a problem. It's a problem because it keeps my system ready for a specific amount of feeling full. My metabolism is slow which means that to lose weight, I should not even have an evening snack even if it's only an apple. Restaurant food has more salt, butter (fat), sauces than any homemade food.
Fat people have to look at what they are eating and they are the only ones who can figure out why they are over eating so, yes, they are the responsible party in the end. Like the woman I saw with the very heavy child though, I believe parents have a responsibility to teach children proper eating habits and not to force food on them as long as they know the child has eaten enough. There is a major difference between enough and too much. I did fine in life until an older sister came home from another province. I had never in my life been told that I had to clean up my plate until she said so. I found her quite intimidating and did as I was told. I carried that on to my own kids and I did them a mis-service. Today we understand that it's not necessary to eat every crumb and probably more necessary to leave more than a few crumbs on the plate. The "You should consider yourself lucky to have food because kids in other countries or cities don't have" approach is just wrong.

Obesity is a very complex issue, with many causes. It is simplistic and absurd to claim that if only fat people will just stop eating, obesity will end. It is not that simple.

You are right - it is too simplistic to believe that if fat people just stop eating so much, obesity will end because that's never going to happen. It's very hard work to lose weight and it's considerably harder for women then it is for men. It also seems to be harder for men to diet on their own. If I choose the foods (if my husband has stated that he wants to lose weight and agrees that he will eat what I prepare) he will lose weight rapidly where I will lose but I will lose at a considerably slower rate than he does. For the amount of groceries I pack and lift in a day, you would think my arms should be muscular and my hands slim. I am strong but I am not muscular and my hands appear heavier than other over-weight people I see. I've never figured out why some women have very slim hands but very fat bodies. My weight is proportional all over. I admit that I envy my husband in that he can lose weight so quickly for one thing and that he has me to prepare the food for him. I wish I had someone (aside from myself) who would go to the trouble for me. He cooks but he leaves for work and he loads my plate up fit for a man and he's a little hurt if he comes home and asks me if I ate it all!! I've asked over and over for him to put half on my plate what he puts on his. Mindless eating comes into play again as I sit down with my plate beside me and check my email and these pages. What I will start doing is clearing off the excess amount (I only sit down to the computer at dinner if he's at work) before I sit down so I won't have the mindless eating. I think I've come up with a way to help myself but I'll have to see how that goes before I blab about it.
 
Last edited: