"Underpaid and overworked" is a matter of opinion. I see people "earning" minimum wage that could be paid half that rate and still be overpaid, as far as value for the job goes. Thinking that you are underpaid is a poor excuse to deliberately do a bad job (eg - not give a crap about customers). When a person is down at that low level of thinking ("the world owes me a living and I'm not being paid enough to take all this abuse"), do you think another 2 or 3 bucks an hour will magically improve their performance? Not bloody likely. Or at least not for long.
At the risk of sounding very "un-Canadian", I wonder what would happen if the whole country went on a "pay for performance" scheme and lost the flat pay rate entirely? If a person selling burgers and fries at the local fast food joint was paid a percentage of their sales, you'd soon figure out which ones are pulling their share of the load. They would be the ones jumping to the counter to take care of the customer, and making sure they didn't forget to order that side of fries or a shake. As for the other ones? Who cares? If they decide they don't want to work to a productive level, it would then their own decision to earn less money.
From the company's point of view, they'd be spending less on the employees that don't put money on the bottom line.
From the employees' point of view, the good ones would no longer have to pull more than their share of the load to keep the ship afloat. And they could earn more money.
From the customers' point of view, they'd no longer have to endure being ignored and putting up with slow, I-don't-give-a-crap attitudes.
It would be a win-win-win situation! :smile: