How about yankees??
You can call me that too... or Yank. Just don't put NY in front of it.
How about yankees??
That's right Risus... we're American. That's what we call ourselves and that is what everyone else calls us.
Always have, always will.
I hope it will survive - too many depend upon its survival. Personally I will always be grateful the frightening tradition of "royal" has never been introduced...therefore allowing simple countrymen and women to become royal in their own rights.
Obviously the morals of England and those of the States were not the same, otherwise they wouldn't have had a tiff.I get the last word tonight.:smile:
Without an absolute moral law, and a moral law giver, the forefathers would have had no justification for their moral outrage towards England. It would have been mere opinion and therefore worthless. Because a moral standard exists however, they had a legitimate claim.
Anna GThe 1st settlers from Britain were looking for religious freedom - Calvinist- Baptists - etc - so yes there was a large disconnect from Britain - time - distance - and the belief that the settlers had for a new beginning - a fresh start -Obviously the morals of England and those of the States were not the same, otherwise they wouldn't have had a tiff.
Anna GThe 1st settlers from Britain were looking for religious freedom - Calvinist- Baptists - etc - so yes there was a large disconnect from Britain - time - distance - and the belief that the settlers had for a new beginning - a fresh start -
Exactly. They didn't like the morals and other things that England offered, so they moved and started their own country where they could design things the way they wanted..Anna GThe 1st settlers from Britain were looking for religious freedom - Calvinist- Baptists - etc - so yes there was a large disconnect from Britain - time - distance - and the belief that the settlers had for a new beginning - a fresh start -
SJPBest read up on the Terror Tactics the Brits and Settlers used with the Native Americans - also note the difference between how the French worked with the NA - Also refresh your history on the tactics of instilling terror on the colonials by Brit Troops - Hessians -No doubt that is how it started, Goober. Unfortunately, in USA the settlers became even more intolerant, more bigoted that their counterparts in Britain, they gave us the Salem Witch Hunts.
Also, the same settlers which supposedly scorned the ways of Britain, these same people wouldn’t abolish the slavery, they had to fight a civil war over it (Britain abolished it without any fanfare). And I won’t even touch on their shabby treatment of Indians.
So no doubt they came to USA to except persecution, but they on their own launched even a bigger, nastier persecution.
Good point, Goober. Seems to me that the English were pretty damned cruel and intolerant when they wanted to be.SJPBest read up on the Terror Tactics the Brits and Settlers used with the Native Americans - also note the difference between how the French worked with the NA - Also refresh your history on the tactics of instilling terror on the colonials by Brit Troops - Hessians -
In what way do we not have the tradition of ‘Royal’? we acknowledge the authority of the monarch here in Canada. Our biggest (and incidentally, also the most efficient) bank is the Royal Bank. We do have the tradition of ‘Royal’ in this country. Or are you an American (if you are, I wasn’t aware of that).
![]()
![]()
Curosity -What a wonderful document of freedom and rights this is - There are other great historical documents that were printed prior to this and after - But how many can compare to the simplicity and complexity of this.
.Declaration of Independence...
Anna GGood point, Goober. Seems to me that the English were pretty damned cruel and intolerant when they wanted to be.
Try "Eyewitness to History" by John Carey. Or "Great Tales from English History" by Robert Lacey. I haven't read much of them; too brutal for me, but it has some eye-openers alright.
SJPBest read up on the Terror Tactics the Brits and Settlers used with the Native Americans - also note the difference between how the French worked with the NA - Also refresh your history on the tactics of instilling terror on the colonials by Brit Troops - Hessians -
Re read my post - I said Brit and Settlers - they worked hand in hand - check the history.I did not say that British soldiers were any better, Goober. I was simply commenting on the settlers and their persecution of others, even though they left Britain to escape persecution. Treatment of Indians is a different and a very big subject.
I was simply mentioned the treatment of Indians by the settlers, I did not say anything about the British. Whatever the culpability on the part of the British, that does not let the settlers off the hook.
Re read my post - I said Brit and Settlers - they worked hand in hand - check the history.
I Posted it again.
Best read up on the Terror Tactics the Brits and Settlers used with the Native Americans - also note the difference between how the French worked with the NA - Also refresh your history on the tactics of instilling terror on the colonials by Brit Troops - Hessians -
SJPI never even implied that it let the settlers of the hook - You took it and went after the settlers - please realize that they both are guilty - Brits and settlers - and from that the history or actions that took place occurred. Also note how the French worked with the NA - What a difference - read about the early Indian Wars and how the French used the NA - Time to brush up - and I Ain't talking teeth.Again, what does it have to do with anything I posted? I never said that the British were squeaky clean.