USA - Good - Bad and or the Ugly

In Between Man

The Biblical Position
Sep 11, 2008
4,597
46
48
45
49° 19' N, 123° 4' W
and the people who wrote that ringing document that includes "We hold these truths to be self-evident..."

Way back when I was making an argument about absolute morals, I used that document as an example of how the forefathers were appealing their case to a higher power. The absolute moral law and the absolute moral law giver.

To which your reply was "that argument is taken from a position of authority and is therefore invalid"... whatever that means.

So which is it? An invalid argument or a ringing document that holds truths?
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Way back when I was making an argument about absolute morals, I used that document as an example of how the forefathers were appealing their case to a higher power. The absolute moral law and the absolute moral law giver.

To which your reply was "that argument is taken from a position of authority and is therefore invalid"... whatever that means.

So which is it? An invalid argument or a ringing document that holds truths?
You can have truth without invoking a belief in a god. It has been shown before that the authors were anti religious for the most part, so no, they were not invoking a higher power than man.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I think anyone that takes offense at being called "Yankee", "Canuck", "Limey", etc. needs to get a life and grow a skin.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
I think anyone that takes offense at being called "Yankee", "Canuck", "Limey", etc. needs to get a life and grow a skin.
I know this guy that bought a place in town. He lives in Alberta most of the time but spend quite a bit of time here. I once called Albertans "Alberians" and he hasn't talked to me since. Talk about thin skin!:roll::smile:
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
I think anyone that takes offense at being called "Yankee", "Canuck", "Limey", etc. needs to get a life and grow a skin.

That's the way I see it for any ethnic "nickname", but I'm not sure how long you'd survive if you started hollering out "bullhunk", "kike" and "towelhead" in crowded public places. I think for the sake of longevity some discretion must be used.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
JLM

I would think that the term Yankee at that time in history as the term like others has changed - would mean the original 13 (colonies) soon to be States - and I would refer to the song Yankee Doodle Dandy - could have been originally a British song that was derogatory to American soldiers - taken by the colonists and changed -

You could well be right.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
Unfortunately, for most Canadians and obviously for most of the sanctimonious pseudo-partriot posters, here, America is just "bad and ugly".
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
Now you are really confusing me- you are suggesting using a "slang" term to replace what the whole world considers to be a proper term? I know "Yankee" used as slang means any American, but I'm pretty sure the original use meant people from New England.


Gay used to mean happy. Try telling everybody you're gay the next time you're happy.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
It has been shown before that the authors were anti religious for the most part...

That statement is only partly true. It should read it has been falsely shown before that the authors were anti religious for the most part...
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
They destroyed a good word didn't they.

They didn’t destroy it, it evolved in meaning. That is how language changes, words evolve into different meaning, different connotation. There are many words that have a totally different meaning compared to say, 100 years ago. The words ‘stink’ and ‘discrimination’ used to have good meaning (if you said to somebody ‘you stink’, or ‘you have acted with discrimination’, that used to be a compliment, these days it is exactly the opposite).

The word ‘gay’ has evolved, nothing more.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
That's the way I see it for any ethnic "nickname", but I'm not sure how long you'd survive if you started hollering out "bullhunk", "kike" and "towelhead" in crowded public places. I think for the sake of longevity some discretion must be used.
Of course one has to use discretion. I don't shout out ANYTHING in public places. "Canuck", "Yankee", "Mick", and "Limey" aren't ethnic nicknames, BTW. They are nicknames for nationality.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
You can have truth without invoking a belief in a god. It has been shown before that the authors were anti religious for the most part, so no, they were not invoking a higher power than man.

Quite so, Cliffy. Some founding fathers were religious, some were Atheists. Some others were simply Theists without being Christian.

So to me it is quite clear that the phrase ‘we regard these truths as self evident’ (nor the truths that are listed) did not originate from any religion. If it had, the Atheists among them would have objected to it.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Gay used to mean happy. Try telling everybody you're gay the next time you're happy.
I may have compunctions against it if I were a guy. It would depend upon the circumstances I was in. I see nothing wrong with using it as I am, though. lol