What Are the Consequences of Obama Failing?

[lone wolf]

You haven’t proved anything EagleSmack.

402 is by a Troll and as such counts for zero, I don’t even know what it says. 404 is my post and nowhere I admit that I am wrong. 413 is again by a Troll and counts for zero.

So you haven’t come anywhere near to proving that I am wrong. But I know, I know. I am wrong, Happy now?

You could argue black is white, up is down or the sky is pink all you want and will declare yourself right based solely on twisted semantics and pomposity. Just because your sparring partner throws in the towel and leaves you to your delusion doesn't make what you say matter to anyone but you. Some of your yes people have referred to you as an intelligent and well read person. That may be the case, but your debating skills are certainly lacking. Is being a buffon really you?

 

[SirJosephPorter]

Who says that the posts by a troll are automatically wrong?.. Ultimately, the source is irrelevant if the content is accurate.

I didn’t say they were wrong, Captain. I said that its worth was zero (to me). Since I have him on ignore, I don’t even know what it says. So how can it be worth anything to me? It may be right or wrong, I never said it was wrong.

 

[lone wolf]

...but then what can we expect from someone whose aim is on being the most annoying poster ... and goal to be a troll matched by none.

South end of a northbound donkey....

 

[EagleSmack]

You haven’t proved anything EagleSmack.

402 is by a Troll and as such counts for zero, I don’t even know what it says. 404 is my post and nowhere I admit that I am wrong. 413 is again by a Troll and counts for zero.

So you haven’t come anywhere near to proving that I am wrong. But I know, I know. I am wrong, Happy now?

I said 408...man you are slow. Slow AND WRONG

 

[Extrafire]

If it wasn't overwhelmed, there wouldn't be an increasing atmospheric concentration...Instead of the increasing see-saw, we would see a stable see-saw.

Nonsense. The atmosphere has had much more concentration in the past. All it means is that input is currently outpacing outgo. The increase benefits the biosphere.

 

[Extrafire]

I knew what the word means, Extrafire. I assumed that you will be familiar with the recent news so that you will know that politician after politician had to grovel abjectly at Limbaugh’s feet and beg for forgiveness. I thought it was such a common knowledge, that it didn’t’ need any link.

Nope, I'm not letting you off the hook. Since there were (according to you) recent news stories of multiple politicians grovelling at Limbaugh's feet it should be very easy to link to them.

For the third time, back up you claims.

 

[L Gilbert]

That is matter of opinion isn’t it? You haven’t shown how I was proven wrong; you have simply stated your opinion.

You wouldn't recognize the proof if it sat on your face and farted anyway.

Yes, but ....

 

[Extrafire]

Quoting Extrafire

Quoting SirJosephPorter
As I said, de facto leader means that nobody elected him in an official election; he forcibly took on the mantle of leadership.

Oh, now he "forcibly" took on the leadership!:lol: He staged a coup, did he?
...

Now I'm really curious. How did he go about that? Did he have his troops invade Republican headquarters and kill the real leader and his followers? Can't wait to hear how that was done.
​

And while you're at it don't forget to explain this one....​

 

[L Gilbert]

This is sweet! You talking about me changing the subject!

*guffaws*

 

[L Gilbert]

http://forums.canadiancontent.net/<embed src= What a maroon, Bugs Bunny, Looney Tunes, Sound Bite

 

[JLM]

*guffaws*

In 10 words or less what is it "we" are actually arguing about here? Maybe another opinion is needed to get this settled.................:lol::lol::lol:

 

[Tonington]

Nonsense. The atmosphere has had much more concentration in the past.

Non-sequitur.

In the past we had a different biosphere. This is hand waiving. If the biosphere was not overwhelmed, then it would handle all, or nearly all of the emissions. It can't. So, other sinks take it in like the ocean. This leads to other earth systems being overwhelmed, like the global ocean.

Plants require more than just carbon dioxide to grow. They can't simply take in all our excesses without ameliorating the complex interplay of biochemistry which includes other basic requirements for life.

It's not simply outpacing. The rate of change is an increasing one, and of course positive.

 

[EagleSmack]

You wouldn't recognize the proof if it sat on your face and farted anyway.

Well that is a matter of opinion now isn't it? :lol:

 

[L Gilbert]

In 10 words or less what is it "we" are actually arguing about here? Maybe another opinion is needed to get this settled.................:lol::lol::lol:

lol I think we were reaching a consensus about something.

 

[DaSleeper]

...but then what can we expect from someone whose aim is on being the most annoying poster ... and goal to be a troll matched by none.

South end of a northbound donkey....

You're right...I do believe we have an "Angler" in our midst..:lol:

 

[L Gilbert]

Well that is a matter of opinion now isn't it? :lol:

Yes, but .....
:lol:

 

[EagleSmack]

lol I think we were reaching a consensus about something.

But are we really? Even though we may be reaching a consensus you have to admit that reaching and consensus are two completely different words in the dictionary.

 

[SirJosephPorter]

I said 408...man you are slow. Slow AND WRONG

408 doesn't prove me wrong. I replied to it in post 409.

 

[SirJosephPorter]

Nope, I'm not letting you off the hook. Since there were (according to you) recent news stories of multiple politicians grovelling at Limbaugh's feet it should be very easy to link to them.

For the third time, back up you claims.

And for the third time, I have given you a link, in post 430. It lists names of several Republican politicians who criticized Limbaugh and then were forced to apologize to him. If you don’t want to believe it, that is not my problem.

 

[SirJosephPorter]

Quoting Extrafire

And while you're at it don't forget to explain this one....​

Look, you evidently don’t know (or choose not to know) what ‘de facto’ means. We are never going to come to agreement on this one. Let us agree to disagree. I say Limbaugh is the de facto leader of Republican apart, you say he is not (I don’t knew who you think is the leader of the Republican Party). Let us leave it at that. I think we have discussed it long enough.