Lawyer attacks Dziekanski's reputation at inquiry
The biggest flaw in the system that I can see is that (be it Federal,
municipal, or provincial forces) the Police are policing the Police.
A separate body (unbiased in theory) supposedly reviews their
findings before rubber stamping and closing the investigations...
This body is know in most provinces as a "Public Complaints
Commission" in its newest Civilian friendly title...but would have
formerly be titled a "Police Complaints Commission."
Before the Braidwood Commission, back in December of 2008,
the investigation of these four officers by the RCMP, and the
crown prosecutor, RCMP Hierarchy, and a Police Complaints
Commission would have ALL had access to the officers statements
AND the video we've all seen....in order to find that no charges,
(and that would include the falsifying of those reports in a more
or less identical manner) either criminal or disciplinary would be
forthcoming. That system seems to be very broken indeed.
I'm going to wait until the end of this Inquiry and listen very hard
to its conclusions and recommendations. Only two officers where
involved in the Tasering, all four watched this guy die on the floor
of an airport without any attempts at resuscitation, and all four have
involved themselves in a cover-up of the details in this death, and
all four have perjured themselves at this inquiry....BUT....they are
not alone in this....and it goes right up the chain.
It has been demonstrated that all four of these officers are not
reliable witnesses, or are outright fabricators of the truth...so that
any future court appearances they might have to make for any other
cases will be suspect at best. Reasonable doubt for anyone brought
to court by any of these four officers in the future would be to just
point out the Braidwood Inquiry...this would leave their effectiveness
in a court environment, or any situation where their honesty & integrity
may be questioned, in a questionable and dubious position at best.
As effective law enforcement officers, I believe their days are done
as their conviction rate would be somewhere (I'm assuming) around
zero. Let's see where the Braidwood Commission takes this ugly
situation with its suggestions and recommendations...
The biggest flaw in the system that I can see is that (be it Federal,
municipal, or provincial forces) the Police are policing the Police.
A separate body (unbiased in theory) supposedly reviews their
findings before rubber stamping and closing the investigations...
This body is know in most provinces as a "Public Complaints
Commission" in its newest Civilian friendly title...but would have
formerly be titled a "Police Complaints Commission."
Before the Braidwood Commission, back in December of 2008,
the investigation of these four officers by the RCMP, and the
crown prosecutor, RCMP Hierarchy, and a Police Complaints
Commission would have ALL had access to the officers statements
AND the video we've all seen....in order to find that no charges,
(and that would include the falsifying of those reports in a more
or less identical manner) either criminal or disciplinary would be
forthcoming. That system seems to be very broken indeed.
I'm going to wait until the end of this Inquiry and listen very hard
to its conclusions and recommendations. Only two officers where
involved in the Tasering, all four watched this guy die on the floor
of an airport without any attempts at resuscitation, and all four have
involved themselves in a cover-up of the details in this death, and
all four have perjured themselves at this inquiry....BUT....they are
not alone in this....and it goes right up the chain.
It has been demonstrated that all four of these officers are not
reliable witnesses, or are outright fabricators of the truth...so that
any future court appearances they might have to make for any other
cases will be suspect at best. Reasonable doubt for anyone brought
to court by any of these four officers in the future would be to just
point out the Braidwood Inquiry...this would leave their effectiveness
in a court environment, or any situation where their honesty & integrity
may be questioned, in a questionable and dubious position at best.
As effective law enforcement officers, I believe their days are done
as their conviction rate would be somewhere (I'm assuming) around
zero. Let's see where the Braidwood Commission takes this ugly
situation with its suggestions and recommendations...