9/11 Truth Manifesto

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
Carlin was a master, but he got kind of a rough political edge later in his career.

Anyway, still a big fan.

However, politicians don't own my thoughts.

If you want me to believe that 9/11 wasn't the work of Islamic terrorists you're gonna have to do better than thermite. That's thinking for myself. It's not that I'm buying the party line, I'm just not buying the "troofer" line.

Islamic terrorists attacked America on 9/11, as they attacked America many times before. 9/11 just happened to be the most spectacular. The evidence of that is overwhelming. Video of a mysterious glowing metal (most likely aluminum anyway) means nothing. Puffs of air coming out of a collapsing building are not at all surprising. And on and on. That intelligent thinking human beings can believe any of that troofer crap is embarrasing to the species.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Anybody heard of google?

Why should we important people waste our expensive time and priceless effort searching for the meaning of a ****ty word you have introduced to the thread? You could show a bit of bloody decency and provide your friends and good buddies with the freaking meaning but no you want us to sweat and toil and sweat and toil for our bread, whasupdoc? Hope you're feeling good JTF
Merry Tuesday PS and wedensday:lol:
 

Just the Facts

House Member
Oct 15, 2004
4,162
43
48
SW Ontario
Here you go:

Skipping ahead in the script, the next telling dialogue I've excerpted is from the conversation between Zoolander, a Time magazine reporter (Stiller's wife in real life), and an outcast male model/conspiracy nut played by David Duchovny from The X Files. The scene takes place in a graveyard where the bodies of male models are buried after they've accomplished their missions as brainwashed assassins.

DD: "Let's take a walk. What you've stumbled upon goes way deeper than you could ever fathom. The fashion industry has been behind every major political assassination over the last two hundred years -- and behind every hit a card carrying male model."

Time reporter: "That's impossible.

DD: "Oh yeah? Listen and learn sweetness. Abe Lincoln wanted to abolish slavery - right? But who do you think made the powdered wigs and coloured leg stockings worn by our country's early leaders?"

Derek Zoolander: "Mugatu?"

DD: "Slaves, Derek. Without their free labour the prices on such items would have gone up tenfold. So the powers-that-be hired John Wilkes Booth, the original model-slash-actor to do Mr Lincoln in. I'll go on."
"Dallas Texas, 1963. Kennedy had just put a trade embargo on Cuba, essentially halting the shipment of Cuban manufactured songs about slacks - an incredibly popular item at the time."

Time: "Lee Harvey Oswald was NOT a male model."

DD: "You're god-damned RIGHT he wasn't. But those two lookers who capped Kennedy from the Grassy Knoll sure as **** were."

Time: "Well what about you?. How do you fit into all this?"

DD: "J.B. Prewlitt, hand model ... and that's when I found out I was in line to assassinate Jimmy Carter."

Time: "But how did you manage to escape?"

DD: "'Cus I'm a hand model Mama. We don't think the same way as the face and body models do. We're a different breed."

DZ: "So why male models?"

DD: "Think about it Derek. Male models are genetically constructed to become assassins. They're in peak physical condition. They can gain entry into the most secure places in the world. And most important of all, models don't think for themselves. They do as they're told."

DZ: "That is not true."

DD: "Yes it is Derek."

DZ: "Okay."

DD: "Yeah. Think about any photo shoot you've ever been on."

DZ: "Good point."

Time: "But if this has been going on for so long - Mugatu?"

DD: "He's just a punk-ass errand boy working for an international syndicate of fashion designers. You do a little background check on Mugatu and you'll find that he's sold his soul to the devil for a shot at the big time.

DZ: "But why male models?"

DD: "Are you serious. I just, I just told you that a moment ago."

http://www.orwelltoday.com/moviezoolander.shtml
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Why wouldn't he want to show us this? There are no new revelations.

Oh...the guy on the street that said it was a bomb? Oh well case closed then. Please ignore the hundreds of photos and videos of private citizens who filmed a plane crashing into the buildings. Some guy said it was a bomb. Thanks...enlightening. :roll:
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Why wouldn't he want to show us this? There are no new revelations.

Oh...the guy on the street that said it was a bomb? Oh well case closed then. Please ignore the hundreds of photos and videos of private citizens who filmed a plane crashing into the buildings. Some guy said it was a bomb. Thanks...enlightening. :roll:

I didn't see no picture of no plane hitting no Pentagoon. Did you?
 

Stretch

House Member
Feb 16, 2003
3,924
19
38
Australia
And a round and round we go! What about the debris? The missing people?

what debris? .......
FBI Claims 84 Videos Show NO Flight 77 Impact
By Jon Carlson
carlson.jon@att.net
10-8-5

[SIZE=+1]Photos taken after the Pentagon crash do not support the Government conspiracy theory that Flight 77, a Boeing 757 airliner, demolished a major portion of the masonry structure:[/SIZE] FBI Claims 84 Videos Show NO Flight 77 Impactits easy to "disappear" people......
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
The re-emergence of this thread reminded me, back to the two towers.........I gave the example of the largest building ever brought down by Controled demolition........ 33 stories. (The WTC was 110). It took 16,000 man hours to set up. Building gutted, major beams cut, 36.000 feet of det cord, 2700 lbs of explosive...........so how did the conspirators manage in a occupied building?

One of the conspiracy morons (I'm not sure which one) said it was obvious.....now they use radio controled detonators, so they wouldn't need considerably more than the 10 kilometers used at Hudson's. As if that explained everything.

Well, even that tepid (to be generous) defense of that single aspect of the conspiracy turns out to be BS. I watched a show on CD on Discovery Channel......nothing to do with 9-11 or the WTC..........guess what?

The use of det cord is absolutely essential in the timing of progressive explosions........absolutely essential.....NOT done remotely.

Once again, the claims of the Conspiracy Looneys are proven to be based on a foundation of hot air.
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The re-emergence of this thread reminded me, back to the two towers.........I gave the example of the largest building ever brought down by Controled demolition........ 33 stories. (The WTC was 110). It took 16,000 man hours to set up. Building gutted, major beams cut, 36.000 feet of det cord, 2700 lbs of explosive...........so how did the conspirators manage in a occupied building?

One of the conspiracy morons (I'm not sure which one) said it was obvious.....now they use radio controled detonators, so they wouldn't need considerably more than the 10 kilometers used at Hudson's. As if that explained everything.

Well, even that tepid (to be generous) defense of that single aspect of the conspiracy turns out to be BS. I watched a show on CD on Discovery Channel......nothing to do with 9-11 or the WTC..........guess what?

The use of det cord is absolutely essential in the timing of progressive explosions........absolutely essential.....NOT done remotely.

Once again, the claims of the Conspiracy Looneys are proven to be based on a foundation of hot air.

Hey Colpy, while you are singularly incapable of developmental change the same is obviously not true of demolition
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
70
Saint John, N.B.
Hey Colpy, while you are singularly incapable of developmental change the same is obviously not true of demolition

Huh!

My mind is like a steel trap...........outmoded, politically incorrect, and rusted shut.

:)

Seriously, the program I watched discussed demolitions done well after 2001.....it was very up-to-date. NO radio control. Det cord is an essential part of the progressive nature of the demolition.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
I don't see no plane hitting the building, if I don't see the plane then I don't see the debris or the people. We ain't going arround and arround you are.

Where did the plane go? Where did the people go? Don't say ask my government or George Bush...that is a cop out.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA


Aircraft debris


 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
C'mon Stretch. I just read that link and they pretty much debunked their own conspiracy with the pictures and comments.

And your comment "Something slammed into the Pentagon but it wasn't a 757. Rumsfeld said it was a missle in a slip o' the tongue" was pulled DIRECTLY from the text on the webpage.

I LOVED how they matched up the debris PERFECTLY to an American airlines picture but said the Lt. color blue was a little off. Gee... do you think that different lighting may change the appearence of color slightly. Heck they saved me that work!