The book doesn't need to be deciphered, what you read is what it means. It also means if there are 24 passages that are used to explain something and you don't read them all you are not going to get the whole picture and if that is the case read the first and last 3 chapters of the book and leave the rest alone. Better to be naive of what is in the middle than to do a half-way job and end up with the wrong version.There is no divine interpretation.
I hope that means you are over 25. I seem to have left my later years as the time to cover the things I glossed over in my youth.The older I get, the more simple and yet complex things become all at the same time.
I am getting close to sixty now. I have never really glossed over things even in my youth, even as a child, I always needed to know "why". If an adult didn't have a good reason I figured it was not about being beneficial for me but rather convenient for them. This last year has been more challenging for me than the last decade I think which means it has been a time of learning some difficult lessons which were none the less necessary for self growth. Self growth can suck. You can do it the easy way, which is listen to the whisper or you can avoid that on multiple levels and wait until it is a brick to the head. I needed some bricks to the head apparently. LOL... always an interesting journey eh?I hope that means you are over 25. I seem to have left my later years as the time to cover the things I glossed over in my youth.
please don't hang yourself...lol...My good friend, MHz, i wish you G*d speed in your quest. But, as you know, I cannot follow you in your journey.
Instead, I shall take 20 metres of copper enamelled wire #30, and listen for the gods.
lol, k good thing, was getting a tad scary thereNo, as MHz will tell you, it's for a receiver not an exit.
Okay.I am getting close to sixty now.
That hasn't changed except the ones doing the lying aren't your parents, they are probably less likely to do that if they are still around, both of mine are dead and in the earlier days they may have been mopre honest than I gave them credit for, even if the answers are the same as you describe.I have never really glossed over things even in my youth, even as a child, I always needed to know "why". If an adult didn't have a good reason I figured it was not about being beneficial for me but rather convenient for them.
My biggest lessons lately are the body gives in before the mind does. I will be somewhat disappointed if my mind and body are gone and I'm still breathing. If I die at 76 like my father and his father then I have 16 years left, if I live as old as my mother them I'm looking at 35 more years.This last year has been more challenging for me than the last decade I think which means it has been a time of learning some difficult lessons which were none the less necessary for self growth.
True, for me it was admitting I didn't already know it all while being able to explain none of it, safe mental position but not a very honnest assessment of myself. My most difficult challenge was to say, 'no.' when something was promoted as being right when I had information that is wasn't right. That isn't a trait that is always welcomed but it is better than feeling shame in not speaking out.Self growth can suck.
That would mean you are incapable of learning and that probably isn't true. What is true is your childhood memories of the Bible won't give you the same story as if you covered it again today. Two examples would show if that is true or not, Daniel:7 and Revelation:17 both have a vision and an explanation, as a child they would both be somewhat cryptic, as a mature thinking adult if you read the vision part again after reading the explanation it isn't at all difficult to understand. (for just that part, the prophecy has a lot more text that applies to what tose two references cover and they do cover the same period of time which may not be apparent right away.You can do it the easy way, which is listen to the whisper or you can avoid that on multiple levels and wait until it is a brick to the head. I needed some bricks to the head apparently.
To be quite truthful it may not have meant very much if I had attempted it earlier in life but it sure makes these years interesting. lolLOL... always an interesting journey eh?
I thought a short-wave antenna was 30 ft of unshielded copper wire?please don't hang yourself...lol...
I thought a short-wave antenna was 30 ft of unshielded copper wire?
my parents weren't the lying type actually other than the Santa thing and the tooth faery and Easter Bunny. My parents kept it real. I was close to both of my parents. I choose well.Okay.
That hasn't changed except the ones doing the lying aren't your parents, they are probably less likely to do that if they are still around, both of mine are dead and in the earlier days they may have been mopre honest than I gave them credit for, even if the answers are the same as you describe.
me tooMy biggest lessons lately are the body gives in before the mind does. I will be somewhat disappointed if my mind and body are gone and I'm still breathing.
That's interesting because I have never had a problem speaking my mind to those closest to me. But to speak to those more removed I have often avoided it in order to be part of the group and keep things harmonious. I always regretted that. I no longer stay silent that but I still struggle with it.True, for me it was admitting I didn't already know it all while being able to explain none of it, safe mental position but not a very honnest assessment of myself. My most difficult challenge was to say, 'no.' when something was promoted as being right when I had information that is wasn't right. That isn't a trait that is always welcomed but it is better than feeling shame in not speaking out.
No what that means is that as we travel the road of life when we need to alter our path or need to change our thought patterns or behaviour we are given painless little clues along the way. When we avoid them the clues become louder and more painful. They will continue until we alter our behavior or live with the pain.That would mean you are incapable of learning and that probably isn't true.
I didn't read the bible as a child but as an adult.What is true is your childhood memories of the Bible won't give you the same story as if you covered it again today. Two examples would show if that is true or not, Daniel:7 and Revelation:17 both have a vision and an explanation, as a child they would both be somewhat cryptic, as a mature thinking adult if you read the vision part again after reading the explanation it isn't at all difficult to understand. (for just that part, the prophecy has a lot more text that applies to what tose two references cover and they do cover the same period of time which may not be apparent right away.
It's all about being ready, I agree.To be quite truthful it may not have meant very much if I had attempted it earlier in life but it sure makes these years interesting. lol
Tact with me means sometimes I'm a tad too blunt even though the message would be the same using a 'gentler' approach.I always regretted that. I no longer stay silent that but I still struggle with it.
No what that means is that as we travel the road of life when we need to alter our path or need to change our thought patterns or behaviour we are given painless little clues along the way. When we avoid them the clues become louder and more painful. They will continue until we alter our behavior or live with the pain.
tact doesn't always work with people I have found... they may choose to view it as weak and ineffectual or interpret the message totheir advantage...their problem of course, but I attempt to separate the action/behavior from the actual person (although not always successfully)Tact with me meand sometimes I'm a tad too blunt even though the message would be the same using a 'gentler' approach.
The painful part was when I was about 35, one of those sink or swim moments. It turns out I did know how to swim a long time before that but I gave it up to fit in, not my wisest move apparently but I am quite comfortable with the last 25 over what they would have been like without the 'growing up' part.
Tact is more to do with people that I actually care about, anybody else it is better just to throw it out there and see waht happens, if it goes south it isn't a big worry and the 'problem' is either 'fix it now' or 'go away now'.tact doesn't always work with people I have found... they may choose to view it as weak and ineffectual or interpret the message totheir advantage...their problem of course, but I attempt to separate the action/behavior from the actual person (although not always successfully)
That isn't a tactic I'm willing to use on my grandson.I really do believe that the behaviour is not always the heart of the person until the behaviour displayed is repetitive and then I cut it off. That part was a hard life lesson with a former friend. Everyone around me could see I was enabling her except for me. What finally jolted me to reality was when another friend who was attempting to help me see that spending hours on the phone with her was in fact not "helping" then said in sheer exasperation...you'd best figure out what you are getting out of this relationship and if it is "enough". that brought me up short...they were right. Of course it wasn't that clean or easy but essentially that is what happened.
That was getting a prescription so I don't lose my composure, when actually it is the medical community that needs to wise up and start taking things a little more seriously.one line sticks out in my head and frequently repeats...BE the change you wish to see. I try, I don't always make it but tomorrow is a new opportunity when I fail today.
yup, we have to view each situation individually. hope it works out.That isn't a tactic I'm willing to use on my grandson.
Except possibly a bunch of Christians getting all bent out of shape over their "right" to spend government funds in direct violation of the First Amendment to express their Christian faith by displaying German pagan symbols that are mentioned nowhere in the bible.Nothing like a debate over 2 fictional characters as to what they may look like...............