Zimmerman NOT guilty

[JLM]

Police, Firemen, Teachers, State and Federal Workers... private and public employees. Every state, town, city, and federal job has some type of affirmative action program. Most private companies as well.


So there you go.

Not the same in Canada?

I'd tell them "F**K off, none of your business"

 

[L Gilbert]

There you go......Copying Pete.....You disappoint me to no end...:-(

Nah. I said "Batmanwannabe". Pete said "Batman". Think I shoulda said, "Stupormanwannabe"?

 

[Sal]

lol Nothing like assuming facts not in evidence, is there. Didn'tcha hear the verdict .......... not enough evidence? Ya don't think the kid might have been trying to find a place to hide from Zimmerman? That ain't a possibility?
Either way, it's irrelevant; Zimmerman, or should I say Batmanwannabe, SHOULD have followed instructions and stayed put.

pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft, well ya didn't disappoint me... right on!!!!!

 

[DaSleeper]

Nah. I said "Batmanwannabe". Pete said "Batman". Think I shoulda said, "Stupormanwannabe"?

That makes it "almost" plagiarism... :lol:

 

[L Gilbert]

That makes it "almost" plagiarism... :lol:

"Close" counts in horsehoes, curling, shotguns, .........
lol

 

[petros]

Simply speaking....

What's the matter? Reality doesn't fit in with your delusions?

 

[EagleSmack]

Ah, yes, I forgot about the Sooper Seekrit Quota that's so sooper seekrit that nobody has ever been able to produce any evidence of it.

Sigh... I knew your mouth would pass your brain on this.

What part of "Right... there are no "quotas"" did you not understand?

So you're right... there are no "quotas"... because the word quota is deemed racially divisive.

So feel free to take that foot out of your mouth.

 

[petros]

There you go......Copying Pete.....You disappoint me to no end...:-(

Copying me? He has the ability to think on his own. He doesn't say or do things just to try to fit in like you do.

 

[EagleSmack]

I'd tell them "F**K off, none of your business"

Then the next thing you'd hear is...

"Next applicant please!"

You'd hear that a lot.

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

Sigh... I knew your mouth would pass your brain on this.

What part of "Right... there are no "quotas"" did you not understand?

So you're right... there are no "quotas"... because the word quota is deemed racially divisive.

So feel free to take that foot out of your mouth.

No. . . there are no quotas because quotas are illegal, per the Supreme Court. There also are no hiring preferences, except as I noted above.

Disagree? Shouldn't be too hard to produce a citation to the racial hiring preference. For example, the veterans' preference is at 5 U.S.C. 2108 and 5 C.F.R. 302.

Got a comparable cite for the alleged racial preference, or is it too sooper seekrit?

 

[DaSleeper]

Copying me? He has the ability to think on his own. He doesn't say or do things just to try to fit in like you do.

 

[petros]

No. . . there are no quotas because quotas are illegal, per the Supreme Court. There also are no hiring preferences, except as I noted above.

Disagree? Shouldn't be too hard to produce a citation to the racial hiring preference. For example, the veterans' preference is at 5 U.S.C. 2108 and 5 C.F.R. 302.

Got a comparable cite for the alleged racial preference, or is it too sooper seekrit?

The government's word isn't "quota,". It's "target."

See what I mean about thinking on your own. You can't. You always post some photo because you aren't smart enough to come up with something.

Why aren't you smart enough to keep up with the rest of us?

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

The government's word isn't "quota,". It's "target."

No targets either.

Again, anyone who disagrees with me can shut me up real quick with a simple citation to the United States Code or the Code of Federal Regulations.

Here's a hint. Government operations is in Title 5 of the U.S.C., and hiring practices and preferences are in Title 5 of the C.F.R.

 

[DaSleeper]

The government's word isn't "quota,". It's "target."


See what I mean about thinking on your own. You can't. You always post some photo because you aren't smart enough to come up with something.

Why aren't you smart enough to keep up with the rest of us?

Keep dancing.....You still haven't overcome your illusions of adequacy......and for that I'll let you have the last word..... before you throw a tantrum little girl....

 

[petros]

You heading out to the bathhouse? Have fun and don't forget to use a condom.

 

[EagleSmack]

No. . . there are no quotas because quotas are illegal, per the Supreme Court. There also are no hiring preferences, except as I noted above.

Disagree? Shouldn't be too hard to produce a citation to the racial hiring preference. For example, the veterans' preference is at 5 U.S.C. 2108 and 5 C.F.R. 302.

Got a comparable cite for the alleged racial preference, or is it too sooper seekrit?

Right... Affirmative Action is non-existent.

Keep going Ding Dong!

How did the State of California put it in so many words...

Although racial quotas are illegal, we understand the need to have a diverse etc etc.

So yes TBones.... wink wink nod nod

Or are yu 2 stupeed n' imychure n' ned 2 keeb ben a troul?

 

[petros]

No targets either.

Again, anyone who disagrees with me can shut me up real quick with a simple citation to the United States Code or the Code of Federal Regulations.

Here's a hint. Government operations is in Title 5 of the U.S.C., and hiring practices and preferences are in Title 5 of the C.F.R.

I never said I doubted you. I have no familiarity with what the US policy is.

 

[karrie]

Right... Affirmative Action is non-existent.

Keep going Ding Dong!

I'm unfamiliar with the realities of affirmative action in the US.... have you got links as to how it's applied and where?

 

[Tecumsehsbones]

I never said I doubted you. I have no familiarity with what the US policy is.

I know. I'm speaking generally. I'll be a little more careful with my wording to avoid confusion in the future.

 

[Locutus]

I hope his family does too Loc. I hope this guy's conscience kicks in. If it does, he will never have another peaceful day in his life.

Ya see, I am one of your accused, and guilty as charged who see it as an unjust ending to a tragic case. I see a 17 year old kid dead, and it didn't have to be if buddy had a brain and the ability to analyse the situation and a high self esteem. I have to tell ya most of the males in my life are very balanced Loc. Had they been there this kid, he would be alive. Not gunned down by an imbecile with the inability to make a quick decision or with a need to get even. He must have been super out of shape to let a kid like that best him And that is exactly what happened here. He would not be bested, and he is out of shape with an average IQ and a gun. Let's not analyze the obvious.


Just to put your mind at ease so ya don't worry about me at night, I am not foaming at the mouth. In fact, contrary to what you hope for every time you post one of your uber right winged leaning posts, it just saddens me that this kid is dead. I don't care if he goes free, the jury has spoken and me, I'm into karma. It will all even out. But in the mean time, a life has been taken and it didn't have to be.

It just didn't have to be and that is tragic.

Odd that you made yourself a target of my post since it was directed yet again at the maddening media crowds and some of their more ardent regurgitation cheerleaders. If you're one, nothing I can do about that. I don't keep score.

George looks like a dolt and a coward. Most everyone knows that. Facts were presented, lottsa legal mumbo jumbo then a jury said not guilty.

I think that if anyone thinks he feels like a big man about what went down that night, they're as dumb as a sack of hammers. He's likely relieved he lived and that justice was on his side during the ridiculous show trial. Otherwise, his life and that of his family is in turmoil in part because of the cheerleaders.

The continual speculation does nothing but aggravate the never-to-be-satisfied masses.