Lately there has been talk of a moratorium on Israeli settlements, and some concern that some settlements might be dismantled, possibly forcefully and with resistance.
(Negotiating With the Israeli Settlers | The American Task Force on Palestine)
While I can certainly respect the fact that many of these settlements were in contravention of international law in the sense that they were being developed on territory not legally recognized as Israeli lands, now that the settlers are already there, while I can understand turning the land over to Palestinian rule, why could settlers not be given the choice to either return to Israeli territory or accept Palestinian citizenship?
Now don't get me wrong. Palestine has no obligation under international law to accept any Israeli citizen, and it's certainly within Palestine's right to ask that those settlers be removed before handover. On strictly compassionate grounds though, why could Palestine not offer at least the option to the settlers. Sure my guess is most of the settlers would refuse, still insist on staying, and get ready for a showdown with the Israeli Defense Force as had happened once before (Israel in a Showdown with West Bank Settlers - TIME). But why not offer the option anyway as a goodwill gesture? At least this would eliminate any argument on the part of the settlers of their lives being disrupted. Should they choose to stay, they could be granted Palestinian nationality, and still be free to practice their Jewish Faith, but just accept that from there on in their government will be Muslim instead of Jewish and that their children will probably have to learn Arabic as at least their second language in school. Of course they'd be expected to integrate into Palestinian society over time, but otherwise be free to preserve their religion, language and culture in their settlements.
If Israel and Palestine could establish relatively free trade and fee movement of labour, this would also mean that these Jewish settlers would not feel so isolated from other Jews in the region since they could still visit Israel whenever they wished, trade with Israel, receive visitors and tourists from Israel, etc.
At least then it could be shown that the Palestinian side, though perfectly within its rights according to international law to kick those settlers off the land, is willing to show some compassion towards them beyond the call of duty.This would likely also make it easier for Netanyahu too, who clearly does not want to have to face a showdown with the settlers either.
(Negotiating With the Israeli Settlers | The American Task Force on Palestine)
While I can certainly respect the fact that many of these settlements were in contravention of international law in the sense that they were being developed on territory not legally recognized as Israeli lands, now that the settlers are already there, while I can understand turning the land over to Palestinian rule, why could settlers not be given the choice to either return to Israeli territory or accept Palestinian citizenship?
Now don't get me wrong. Palestine has no obligation under international law to accept any Israeli citizen, and it's certainly within Palestine's right to ask that those settlers be removed before handover. On strictly compassionate grounds though, why could Palestine not offer at least the option to the settlers. Sure my guess is most of the settlers would refuse, still insist on staying, and get ready for a showdown with the Israeli Defense Force as had happened once before (Israel in a Showdown with West Bank Settlers - TIME). But why not offer the option anyway as a goodwill gesture? At least this would eliminate any argument on the part of the settlers of their lives being disrupted. Should they choose to stay, they could be granted Palestinian nationality, and still be free to practice their Jewish Faith, but just accept that from there on in their government will be Muslim instead of Jewish and that their children will probably have to learn Arabic as at least their second language in school. Of course they'd be expected to integrate into Palestinian society over time, but otherwise be free to preserve their religion, language and culture in their settlements.
If Israel and Palestine could establish relatively free trade and fee movement of labour, this would also mean that these Jewish settlers would not feel so isolated from other Jews in the region since they could still visit Israel whenever they wished, trade with Israel, receive visitors and tourists from Israel, etc.
At least then it could be shown that the Palestinian side, though perfectly within its rights according to international law to kick those settlers off the land, is willing to show some compassion towards them beyond the call of duty.This would likely also make it easier for Netanyahu too, who clearly does not want to have to face a showdown with the settlers either.