World In 'Mass Extinction Spasm'

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
Berkeley Scientists: World In 'Mass Extinction Spasm'


Devastating declines of amphibian species around the world are a sign of a biodiversity disaster larger than just the deaths of frogs and salamanders, University of California, Berkeley scientists said Tuesday.


Researchers said substantial die-offs of amphibians and other plant and animal species add up to a new mass extinction facing the planet, the scientists said in an online article this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"There's no question that we are in a mass extinction spasm right now," said David Wake, professor of integrative biology at UC Berkeley. "Amphibians have been around for about 250 million years. They made it through when the dinosaurs didn't. The fact that they're cutting out now should be a lesson for us."New species arise and old species die off all the time, but sometimes the extinction numbers far outweigh the emergence of new species, scientists said.Extreme cases of this are called mass extinction events. There have been only five in our planet's history, until now, scientists said.

The sixth mass extinction event, which Wake and others argue is happening currently, is different from the past events."My feeling is that behind all this lies the heavy hand of Homo sapiens," Wake said.The study was co-authored by Wake and Vance Vredenburg, research associate at the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology at UC Berkeley and assistant professor of biology at San Francisco State University.There is no consensus among the scientific community about when the current mass extinction started, Wake said.It may have been 10,000 years ago, when humans first came from Asia to the Americas and hunted many of the large mammals to extinction.It may have started after the Industrial Revolution, when the human population exploded. Or, we might be seeing the start of it right now, Wake said.No matter what the start date, data show that extinction rates have dramatically increased over the last few decades, Wake said.The global amphibian extinction is a particularly bleak example of this drastic decline, he said.In 2004, researchers found that nearly one-third of amphibian species are threatened, and many of the non-threatened

More...

It seems that pesticides and other poisons are a likely culprit. I suspect the same problem is hurting bees and the oceans. We dump so much pesticide on this planet and release it into the air it seems absurd we would assume it is "safe." I'm sure car, industrial and airplane exhaust is playing a role too.

But with corporate lobbies so powerful I don't see how this mess can be cleaned up. Who the hell can f**k with Monsanto?

A mass extinction is be pretty bad news. It's hard to think what could be worse; nuclear war maybe?

That is the cycle though: an unchecked successful species expands until it's environment can't support it and then they die off en mass.
 
Last edited:

quandary121

Time Out
Apr 20, 2008
2,950
8
38
lincolnshire
uk.youtube.com
And with each and every death of a species ,another that lives on it suffers too,leading to yet another extinction and a spiralling downwards ,of yet more of the creatures that exist on the planet ,its called depoverished areas..
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Dying out of frogs? You ought to see my front yard! This overly wet summer in Northern Ontario has been a tonic to them. Want frogs? C'mon by. I'll send a bootload of 'em home with ya!
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Berkeley just found out? lol
Remember when Colorado killed off all their wolves? This resulted in a fairly largescale aging and dieoff of a few species of vegetation. The short of it is that no wolves resulted in massive upward spike of elk population which in turn resulted in a lot of new growth being eaten by the elk which in turn resulted in a list of aged and dying species. Everything is connected. Everything on the planet has a use and a job.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Not only does everything have a job, losing species --whether because of encroaching human land use, or toxic chemicals that are building up, anoxic oceanic surface waters, or over harvesting --is destroying our heritage. We developed here on Earth, and at this time, with a cornucopia of species. They teach us how the Earth as a whole works, how nature solves problems too complex for our understanding, and we learn how to incorporate this knowledge into novel things like engineering, medicine, computing, waste reduction, and so many other things it boggles the mind.

Losing amphibians? Perhaps one very old species that has survived from the arrival of the amphibia class has natural defenses against a pathogen which has remained dormant somewhere. Or perhaps one has a very specific unknown cellular pump that allows the amphibian to recover from below the temperature where it's blood crystalizes, that is capable of functioning with human anatomy.

The list is so long. It's a shame what this Anthropocene might leave in it's wake.
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
...uhh.. it's utter nonsense.. it's from the same scientific paradigm that has given us Global Warming... all of it based on a profound pessimism, really an ecological religious article of faith, as to the pestilential effect of man on the pristine planet.

Where is the scientific method, the empirical proof .. it's all lost to blind faith in the cult of the disease of 'man'. The only thing that's becoming extinct is real science, replaced by moribund superstition.. and rampant fear mongering (okay, prophesies of doom in the religious parlance).

No useful technologies will be produced by this type of 'voodoo' conjuring (what's the use, we're all going to die, sacrificed on the alter of Mother Earth :roll: ) . Without technological progress science has lost its fundamental inspiration. It's replaced by gibberish like this. We have a major problem here, but it has nothing to do with the planet.. it has everything to do with a scientific establishment that has been taken over by a cult priesthood which is deeply antipathetic to humanity.
 
Last edited:

earth_as_one

Time Out
Jan 5, 2006
7,933
53
48
Of course we are in the middle of a mass extinction. Its not just frogs.

The Current Mass Extinction:
Human beings are currently causing the greatest
mass extinction of species since the extinction of
the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. If present trends
continue one half of all species of life on earth will
be extinct in less than 100 years, as a result of
habitat destruction, pollution, invasive species,
and climate change. (For details see links below.)

http://www.well.com/user/davidu/extinction.html

In the longrun this is a bigger problem than global warming. Eventually we may be able to undo global warming or adapt, but how do we bring a species back from extinction?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
"There is no consensus among the scientific community about when the current mass extinction started, Wake said.It may have been 10,000 years ago, when humans first came from Asia to the Americas and hunted many of the large mammals to extinction."

Carbon dating places humans in South America twenty thousand years ago, conclusivly. Some talk of thirty-five thousand years. The mass extinction of large mamals in north America occured 12,800 years ago, it was caused by a comet, the remains can still be found in permafrost in Alaska and the western Yukon. Frozen herds of meats jammed into the sides of mountains.
Extinction proceeds nevertheless.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Yet ... this summer we've had a lot of weird elongated bee-like fuzzy bugs doing bee-like things in the flowers. I'm not into getting stung so that's about as scientific as I'm getting about them.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
Dying out of frogs? You ought to see my front yard! This overly wet summer in Northern Ontario has been a tonic to them. Want frogs? C'mon by. I'll send a bootload of 'em home with ya!

Where I live in BC there once were so many frogs they were a hazard on the roads. Now I never see them.
 

Scott Free

House Member
May 9, 2007
3,893
46
48
BC
Berkeley just found out? lol
Remember when Colorado killed off all their wolves? This resulted in a fairly largescale aging and dieoff of a few species of vegetation. The short of it is that no wolves resulted in massive upward spike of elk population which in turn resulted in a lot of new growth being eaten by the elk which in turn resulted in a list of aged and dying species. Everything is connected. Everything on the planet has a use and a job.

I can't help but wonder if our campaign against mosquitoes isn't causing some kind of similar problem? It seems like mosquitoes are a bad thing but maybe they are a cornerstone of the ecosystem. Certainly frogs eat them.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Where I live in BC there once were so many frogs they were a hazard on the roads. Now I never see them.

I wonder how much of the frog population is disappearing as we de-water the wetlands. Here in Sudbury district, frogs are a sign of an ecosystem recovering from a half-century's worth of sulphur dioxide and nickle oxide emissions from the smelters - but they don't sing at night like froggies did when I was a kid....