Which raises another issue- Compulsory training in the use of all firearms, explosives etc. should form a major part of the highschool curriculum and to graduate students should be required to demonstrate proficient use and handling of pistols, shotguns and rifles. This could be just as much a life saving measure as learning how to swim and also make them proficient at putting meat on the table when the recession hits and reduce the need to go running for welfare.
Hmmm... I didn't quite follow the link betwen knowing how to fire a weapon and putting meat on the table... Well, I can think of one link, but not a positive one:lol:
Unless you meant that it could help some students get jobs as security guards, police officers, soldiers and such? I suppose.
I could agree to compulsory 'self-defense' courses in high school, as long as there was some choice there. First off, not all students would feel comfortable handling a firearm; and secondly, what happens when you're cought without your firearm?
Looking at it that way, I could see the school giving students a choice between firearms instruction and some kind of empty-handed martial art for those who don't feel comfortable handling firearms.
That said, I do agree with you in principle that some kind of self-defense should be compulsory in school as long as there is some choice of what kind of self-defense.
As for welfare, I still don't follow the logic there though.