I would guess the context would be "military" Although Ghandi was an incomparable "General Leader", he's fall off the radar in a pure military sense
If you confine the definition to military, maybe. However, Gandhi was a brilliant strategist and tactician. He knew what steps to take, what action to perform to rile up the British, to cause the maximum discomfort to the British and to inspire the local population to fight for freedom.
I particularly remember one episode from the film Gandhi. The British banned private citizens producing salt. So of course Gandhi decided to defy the law and make some salt.
Now, if that is all he had done, it would not have caused much of a problem, British would simply have arrested him and that would be that. However, he decided to travel to the place he was going to make salt by foot, he decided to walk 200 miles before breaking the law. That gave his action the maximum publicity, it became known all over India, hundreds (or perhaps thousands) of people joined him along the way and what was a minor incidence of law breaking became a major headache for the British.
Overall, I think he was better at strategy and tactics than any military General.