Who will win the Next Election?

Who will win the Next Election?


  • Total voters
    38

s_lone

Council Member
Feb 16, 2005
2,233
30
48
44
Montreal
when is the next election anyway? or when is the latest it can be called?

Technically, the latest it could be called would be sometime in 2010 (right?)... But with a minority government and with the state of politics in Canada you can be sure it will be much, much sooner then that... I would be very surprised if it didn't happen sometime during 2007... Harper already seems in pre-electoral mode...

It would be kind of funny if the federal elections ended up overlapping the Quebec provincial elections... Maybe not that funny... things could get ugly... Imagine the PQ winning the election during a federal election campaign... The Conservatives and Liberals would suddenly start fighting over who can fight the seperatists the best...

Rumours seem to be pointing towards a Quebec election called for the 26th of Mars... If not that, probably some time in the first weeks of May...
 

Fingertrouble

Electoral Member
Nov 8, 2006
150
1
18
57
Calgary
interesting your right. Conservatives always had a clear platform. Liberals ran with what they tought was the tone of the society.

You are right about the the clear platform that the Conservatives had and I like the way Stephen Harper stuck with his priorities. What I don't like about the Liberals campaigns are that not only do they switch their policies to "suit the tone of society" as you put it, but they also continue to just use scare tactics on the Canadian voters.

Lets talk you own policies Liberals.....not just what the others will (or won't) do!
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
The Liberals have been chastized. Lets get back to normal.

Kaff Kaff

CHASTIZED!

They just elected a former cabinet minister in the most corrupt government in Canadian history as their leader.

Who just said those wonderful Quebec Liberals that ripped us off for 100 million should be welcomed back into the party.

And that SOB just played a very nasty political game in bringing forth a motion to force the gov't to live up to Kyoto, which he knows full well is IMPOSSIBLE without simply shipping off billions of our tax dollars to the UN and China......for NOTHING!

Chastized! au contraire.

The same old, same old.

I'd say eight to ten in the political wilderness would be appropriate.......
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
72
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Kaff Kaff

CHASTIZED!

They just elected a former cabinet minister in the most corrupt government in Canadian history as their leader.
But they don't do that very often. Lemmeesee, when was the last time they did that? Oh, yeah, long time ago when Martin took over from Chretien. Like I said, not very often. The time before Chretien/Martin? Hmmmm. Trudeau/Chretien. Happens so rarely. (all sarcasm really heavily stressed and sincerely meant).

Who just said those wonderful Quebec Liberals that ripped us off for 100 million should be welcomed back into the party.

And that SOB just played a very nasty political game in bringing forth a motion to force the gov't to live up to Kyoto, which he knows full well is IMPOSSIBLE without simply shipping off billions of our tax dollars to the UN and China......for NOTHING!
And they actually get called right "honorable". :puke:
Even Chretien said Kyoto was crap.

Chastized! au contraire.

The same old, same old.

I'd say eight to ten in the political wilderness would be appropriate.......
Makem pay it back with hard labor.
 

MikeyDB

House Member
Jun 9, 2006
4,612
63
48
Marygaspe

Don't you know.....they're all pagans......

Under the shimmering of a full moon you can watch Paul Martin and Jean Chretien burning effigies of past Conservative Prime Ministers...Drenched in the blood of native children Chretien once the minister of Indian affairs and Paul Martin who's incapable of telling the truth compare notes on which is more fun....screwing over the Canadian people or hitting out on the lam with a bunch of stolen taxpayer cash....
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
People, go into the main Canadian politics forum, and read the thread "Priceless Liberals"

... very VERY informative.

I rarely see the Liberals follow through with stuff. The Conservatives HAVE followed through with many changes they promised during elections, and have accomplished alot for 1 year. The child care, GST, accountibility act, etc. The income tax was a lost promise, BUT what about Jean Chretien's promise to abolish the GST after Mulroney... ah hem?

I think alot of these "polls" are rigged somewhat. I think generally society is satisfied with the Conservatives work so far.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Just wondering, what would a Duceppe win be? With 308 seats and 75 in quebec, they could never have a majority(cringes at thought). So what then, like 100% of the Quebec seats, 90% maybe?
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
Bloc has had a opposition before.

See the problem is, that we are not a 2-party system. We have 4 main parties. If these parties each get certain drops in the pot, it could give the Bloc a minority.

Lets see
308 seats
Bloc is in minority with 75
233 seats left
3 other big parties
233 / 3 = 77 seats.

So its "very unlikely" the Bloc would ever get in, by some miracle that they got all their seats, and the other 3 parties got under 70, and the greens picked up some.

That would be a short lived gov. Cut themselves from Canada, and leave.
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
150
63
Right but for all of the big three to get less than 75, thats 11 seats needed between the Greens, Independants and others, doesn't seem very likely. That's also assuming they win all their seats. Being the opposition party to me I guess would be a win for them I guess, and if we get another majority that's likely to be the case. Though I'm not sure which type of Parliament best benefits the Bloc, I would think minority government is better.
 

El Barto

les fesses a l'aire
Feb 11, 2007
5,959
66
48
Quebec
I don't ever remember voting for a party, but voting against one. Last election in my county the conservative were favored so I voted for them. Just didn't want to see the bloc get it . And they didn't. Wohoo ! But to actually believe there's a party that will do whats really needs to be done is being delusional.
 

marygaspe

Electoral Member
Jan 19, 2007
670
11
18
77
Just wondering, what would a Duceppe win be? With 308 seats and 75 in quebec, they could never have a majority(cringes at thought). So what then, like 100% of the Quebec seats, 90% maybe?

I still do not understand how a regional party can qualify itself to win seats in the federal government.
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
For once, I agree with marygaspe. I personally feel a party should have to be nation-wide, and have a candidate running in each riding, to qualify to be a valid party.

Or at least a party has to have coverage in each province.

The Bloc is in it for Quebec and Quebec only. If we vote a Conservative, Liberal, or NDP MP they are in it for their riding and for the entirety of Canada.

I don't like the Bloc-Quebec only party situation.

Oops, doesn't the Bloc have a riding in New Brunswick. NB has lots of French.. I think they do have a riding or 2 in NB for Bloc.. am I wrong?
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
For once, I agree with marygaspe. I personally feel a party should have to be nation-wide, and have a candidate running in each riding, to qualify to be a valid party.

Or at least a party has to have coverage in each province.

The Bloc is in it for Quebec and Quebec only. If we vote a Conservative, Liberal, or NDP MP they are in it for their riding and for the entirety of Canada.

I don't like the Bloc-Quebec only party situation.

Oops, doesn't the Bloc have a riding in New Brunswick. NB has lots of French.. I think they do have a riding or 2 in NB for Bloc.. am I wrong?

Yes, you are VERY wrong...........they do not have a seat, and the Acadiens of New Brunswick would be insulted that you think they would support the Bloc Quebecois
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
Sorry, didn't mean to insult anyone. I just know that New Brunswick has a high number of French-speaking people, and I thought their may be 1 or 2 ridings with a BLOC candidate there.

I am wrong then. sorry.
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
848
113
71
Saint John, N.B.
Sorry, didn't mean to insult anyone. I just know that New Brunswick has a high number of French-speaking people, and I thought their may be 1 or 2 ridings with a BLOC candidate there.

I am wrong then. sorry.

No apology necessary.....just a warning......never call an Acadien a Quebecois.

BTW, I'm as English as they come. Loyalist ancestors on both sides.
 

Vicious

Electoral Member
May 12, 2006
293
4
18
Ontario, Sadly
I cannot wait for the return of the Liberals!

Why? Is it because you disagree with what the conservatives have done, or because of something you expect the Liberals will do if they return to power, or something else?

I'm just curious why anyone would want the Liberals back.

--------------------------------------

I have a political test that helps determine what party you should support.

1. Take a $20 out of you wallet
2. Set it on fire
3. Watch it burn until there is nothing left
4. Go back to 1. and start again.

Determining the political party you should support:

If you actually stopped before 2, you should support the Conservatives. If you cycled through less that 4 times, you should support the Liberals, if you are still doing it, you should support the NDP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDNBear

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Why? Is it because you disagree with what the conservatives have done, or because of something you expect the Liberals will do if they return to power, or something else?

I'm just curious why anyone would want the Liberals back.

--------------------------------------

I have a political test that helps determine what party you should support.

1. Take a $20 out of you wallet
2. Set it on fire
3. Watch it burn until there is nothing left
4. Go back to 1. and start again.

Determining the political party you should support:

If you actually stopped before 2, you should support the Conservatives. If you cycled through less that 4 times, you should support the Liberals, if you are still doing it, you should support the NDP.
rotflmffao!!!

I tried to do it, but I could get past one, I'm married, lol. Although, I think I know myself well enough to think, lol, I wouldn't strike the match.

Great Post!!!

btw, In your signature, would you be referring to Sid Vicious?