Who can really argue with the basic philosophy if you are not Christian, of Jesus –

[L Gilbert]

You're doing it again. That's self-referential, you cannot legitimately cite a document that way in support of itself, it's not a valid argument. You'd be laughed out of any legitimate academy for that.

Of course. And he will continue the ridiculous behavior, too.

You really think it makes any difference whether it's one of us or all of us you're prepared to cast into Hell? The simple fact that you think you're entitled to make such judgments says a lot about your mindset.

..........and about the irrational bilgewater he/she believes in.

 

[L Gilbert]

At any rate, even if this Jesus existed, I think his basic philosophy was of love, not what eannaisr says it was.

 

[earth_as_one]

I'm agnostic, but I agree with the philosphy and teachings of Jesus Christ. If he existed, he was a man, not a god or the son of god, the Pope is fallable, the earth is sphere shaped and orbits the sun, man evolved from lower species...

Imagine how different the world would be if Mary got pregnant the regular way, and Joseph knew he wasn't the father, and married her anyway because he loved her...

 

[L Gilbert]

You know what I found funny from the beginning of this thread? It is that the title begs for a "me" or the name of someone who can argue against Jesus' philosophy. But the answers given are "agree", "disagree", "do not know", and "do not care". So there really are only 2 answers given that can be correct; "I do not know" or "I so not care", yet 75% of the voters didn't choose one of the only 2 answers that can be correct. lol

 

[VanIsle]

You know what I found funny from the beginning of this thread? It is that the title begs for a "me" or the name of someone who can argue against Jesus' philosophy. But the answers given are "agree", "disagree", "do not know", and "do not care". So there really are only 2 answers given that can be correct; "I do not know" or "I so not care", yet 75% of the voters didn't choose one of the only 2 answers that can be correct. lol

There are 5 pages of responses here and only 10 people voted. Polls are very easy to miss. With limited "answers" to respond to, at least "agree" got the most. :smile:

 

[JLM]

We have Atheists – Humanists – Agnostics – Philosophers that are in agreement or not with another philosopher, must drive students crazy – Religions as diverse or at times a common thread runs through – Abraham is traced back by Jews, Christians and Muslims.

So regardless of where you fit in – Who can really argue with the basic philosophy if you are not Christian, of Jesus –


Atheists - somebody who does not believe in God or deities.

Humanist - a system of thought that is based on the values, characteristics, and behavior that are believed to be best in human beings, rather than on any supernatural authority.

Agnostic - somebody who believes that it is impossible to know whether or not God exists or somebody who doubts that a question has one correct answer or that something can be completely understood.

Jesus Christ – Peace, Love thy neighbor – Judge not lest you be judged – Turn the other check – and so on.
Just one link as I am sure other may post their own links.

[URL="http://thelife.com/discover/faith/jesus/whowasjesus/"]http://thelife.com/discover/faith/jesus/whowasjesus/[/URL]

I rather think religion is a personal issue, I'm not sure of anything about it except I know there has to be a supreme being and someone/something is looking after me. I believe in the Bible but don't care to have someone else's interpretation rammed down my throat. If nobody has noticed I CAN READ. :lol::lol::lol::lol: