White House Fires Alexander Vindman

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,041
6,160
113
Twin Moose Creek
Yes, actually it is. A little overblown, but essentially correct. Maybe half or less of the Dems saw a real threat to pur system. The rest just saw a tribal, political opportunity.

Pretty evident with the choice of House managers, only surprise to me was not one of the radical 4 were chosen to really piss off Trump to set him off on twitter tirades.
 

AnnaE

Time Out
Jan 31, 2020
968
0
16
Or maybe common sense set in and they seen there actually was nothing there? Open your eyes and look at what actual crime they charged Trump with?
Regardless, it's great ammunition for any future president that wants to use the office for personal gain.
I see lots of trouble in America's future.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Regardless, it's great ammunition for any future president that wants to use the office for personal gain.
I see lots of trouble in America's future.


It's great ammunition for any future House of Representatives to Impeach a President because they don't like him.




BTW....




FULL

ACQUITTAL
 

AnnaE

Time Out
Jan 31, 2020
968
0
16
It's great ammunition for any future House of Representatives to Impeach a President because they don't like him.
And you probably think Trumplicans wouldn't go that low. Too bad you all didn't have the little, grey cells to think of impeaching Obama. lol
BTW....
FULL

ACQUITTAL
............ but still impeached. You Trumpies just hate democracy, the Constitution, and the rule of law, don'tcha.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,548
8,146
113
B.C.
And you probably think Trumplicans wouldn't go that low. Too bad you all didn't have the little, grey cells to think of impeaching Obama. lol
............ but still impeached. You Trumpies just hate democracy, the Constitution, and the rule of law, don'tcha.
Yet it was the Democrats that fudged the deck and brought frivolous impeachment charges to the Senate to prosecute . Any blame can be laid at the feet of Schiff , Nadler and Pelosi .
Why would they not release the whistleblowers name or for that matter let Republican members cross examine him ? That alone should give one pause for thought . And when you add in the timeline between Schiff meeting and the whistleblower coming forward the waters get even murkier .
But why should you care about any of that , Trump is guilty right ?
 

AnnaE

Time Out
Jan 31, 2020
968
0
16
Yet it was the Democrats that fudged the deck and brought frivolous impeachment charges to the Senate to prosecute .
Only frivolous because the Senate had already made up their minds. If they were real Americans with American values, they'd have welcomed ALL the evidence and then made their decision.
Any blame can be laid at the feet of Schiff , Nadler and Pelosi .
Nope. They were fighting a lost battle from the beginning but pretty much had to impeach because Trump's nothing but a self-serving crook.
Why would they not release the whistleblowers name or for that matter let Republican members cross examine him ?
Really? With Trump's prepubescent temper? lmao You know how he acts when anyone crosses him.
That alone should give one pause for thought .
So use you thought processes.
And when you add in the timeline between Schiff meeting and the whistleblower coming forward the waters get even murkier .
Regardless, Trump is still guilty and his cronies admitted so.
But why should you care about any of that , Trump is guilty right ?
That's what his cronies said, so who am I to argue?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,548
8,146
113
B.C.
Only frivolous because the Senate had already made up their minds. If they were real Americans with American values, they'd have welcomed ALL the evidence and then made their decision.Nope. They were fighting a lost battle from the beginning but pretty much had to impeach because Trump's nothing but a self-serving crook.
Really? With Trump's prepubescent temper? lmao You know how he acts when anyone crosses him. So use you thought processes. Regardless, Trump is still guilty and his cronies admitted so.
That's what his cronies said, so who am I to argue?
They did welcome all evidence the House of Representatives provided them with .

Nope they had to impeach because Nancy Pelosi was losing control of her caucus .

Really , if he can’t stand the heat , why would he jump into a fire ?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,548
8,146
113
B.C.
Only frivolous because the Senate had already made up their minds. If they were real Americans with American values, they'd have welcomed ALL the evidence and then made their decision.Nope. They were fighting a lost battle from the beginning but pretty much had to impeach because Trump's nothing but a self-serving crook.
Really? With Trump's prepubescent temper? lmao You know how he acts when anyone crosses him. So use you thought processes. Regardless, Trump is still guilty and his cronies admitted so.
That's what his cronies said, so who am I to argue?
I Don’t know about his cronies but you have found him guilty . What crime he committed is still up in the air , but he must be guilty .
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
28,548
8,146
113
B.C.
I Don’t know about his cronies but you have found him guilty . What crime he committed is still up in the air , but he must be guilty .
Even some of Nancy Pelosi’s cronies said prior to impeachment that they knew there was no way to remove or even convict Trump , and that the whole exercise was to injure Trump for the 2020 election . But of course you and many others ignore that .
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
96
48
USA
Only frivolous because the Senate had already made up their minds. If they were real Americans with American values, they'd have welcomed ALL the evidence and then made their decision


Libs are such hypocrites.
 

AnnaE

Time Out
Jan 31, 2020
968
0
16
I Don’t know about his cronies but you have found him guilty . What crime he committed is still up in the air , but he must be guilty .
He has a history of civil disobedience among other stuff, so yeah, I think he's guilty of a lot of things.
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,343
9,517
113
Washington DC
meh Tomayto, tomahto.
Not at all. What it means, in short, is that all the babble about "due process" and all the analogies to criminal investigations and prosecutions, are the imbecilic mouth-noise of people whose understanding of the law comes from television programmes.