Of course it is. He has NO C EDIBILITY left. His supporters are like minded .They are simple folks who think in binary terms.
His country is burning and he is talking about Hong Kong. And getting out of WHO.
Poor foolish Ocean Kreskin\HOID \blowhard Breezy! She has no logic and no connection to reality!
In her madness she is attempting to turn Canada into the Excited States of America!
Here is an article illustrating how badly LIE-berals are willing to BEND THE TRUTH in their efforts to paint us all as “racists” and “white supremacists” and “Islamphobes”! With some comments of my own in brackets):
Ontario's 'racialized law' debate is based on bad research.
The study based its conclusions on the responses of 3,237 self-selected lawyers and paralegals. The other 40,000 chose not to participate.
(In other words- our LIE-beral overlords - always obsessed with irrational thoughts of “white privilege” heard from a bunch of defense lawyers who make a NICE LIVING telling LIE-beral hug a thug judges that their criminal clients should be excused all of their vile crimes because of their “sad childhood” experiences! And LIE-berals seriously expect us to humbly accept the verdict of these BIGOTS!!!!)
By Marni Soupcoff, National Post.
Published: February 28, 2019. 7:04 PM EST
Filed under: Comment
Lawyers. Is there any other profession with such an exaggerated sense of its own value and significance? Whenever I hear something new about the statement of principles that the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) is imposing on all legal professionals in the province — mandating lawyers and paralegals to draft a statement about how much they personally value inclusivity, diversity and equality — I think of a joke I once read. Question: What’s the difference between a lawyer and God? Answer: God doesn’t think he’s a lawyer.
OK, the joke is not — technically — phrased in a logical way, but it’s still funny because, like the LSO, the legal profession does seem to think of itself as being able to do and understand all things. And the reason I felt compelled to mention that the joke is technically misstated, even though this is unimportant to my overall point, is because I’m trained as a lawyer.
(The legal profession is sadly fractured just like our politicians- into warring groups!!! The lawyer vetting the purchase of your house cannot be compared to the legal SWINE HIDING in a courthouse bathroom in order to delay a trial until some other day- when prosecution witnesses are NOT AVAILABLE to contradict the web of lies and excuses spun by a defendant!!)
(This defense lawyer deceitful manipulation of our legal system - designed only to minimize honest testimony against criminals and thus reduce their responsibility for criminal behaviour is responsible for much of the stalling and delaying of our courts!)
(An accused who does not have legal council cannot be tried till his lawyer appears and so unscrupulous lawyers routinely HIDE themselves in hope judges will grow exasperated and do a plea deal in order to end the legal CHARADE and clear the over loaded docket!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
(From personal experience I can state that in such deals- done after the judge despairs of getting both defense lawyers and witnesses into court at the same time- will produce ABSURD TRAVESTIES of justice such that car thieves caught red- handed hammering on automobile steering column while trying to hot wire the car will DENY ever having been in the car and will claim all is mistaken identity! There is NO NONSENSE EXCUSE that is beyond the shame of defense lawyers and their clients!!!!)
(Such a thief will even claim the car owner attacked HIM with a knife as he passed by on the sidewalk- and with NO WITNESS available to contradict the B. S. The judge will be more lenient with what appear to be LESSER CRIMES! It is all part of the LIE-beral vote buying service!!!!!!!!!!)
The legal profession does seem to think of itself as being able to do and understand all things
Of course, the reality is that lawyers are flawed human beings, the latest evidence coming in an expert report prepared by Prof. Rod Clifton for the Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) in its constitutional challenge of the LSO statement of principles, which CCF considers forced speech.
(Well yes! LIE-berals ENJOY FORCING us to say things! For instance- Professor Jordan Peterson has become famous for refusing to be FORCED to use obscure pronouns such as “ZHE” that are preferred by a very small minority of transgender persons! The controversy over ZHE is so absurd it reminds me of the introduction made by the club manager in the old movie “Kinky Boots”!)
(The club was the hangout of a wild array of alternative genders so the host would come on stage and offer this greeting to his audience: “good evening ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, and those of you who have yet to make up your minds”!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
(Such is the LIE-beral legal insanity regarding genders and free speech! Clinical Psychologist and senior U of T professor Peterson has identified over 85 different and very obscure gender pronouns that an average person simply cannot use properly as trans gender people desire- without first doing a whole lot of digging into personal sexual practices and preferences! Yet LIE-berals have made ILLEGAL not to use these obscure pronouns when required!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
(LIE-berals have been so callous of our free speech that we can now be jailed for pointing to a student in a LARGE LECTURE HALL with hundreds of students- too many to recall all the names - and saying “you in the red shirt’ WITHOUT using the pronoun “ZHE” in the address to the student!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
As a lawyer, I will disclose here that I am a former executive director of the CCF, so infer any bias you care to. As a writer, I will at last get to the point: Dr. Clifton found that the foundational research on which the LSO based the mandatory statement of principles is extremely flawed.
That is a significant piece of news because without its finding that there is systemic racism in the legal profession in Ontario, the LSO would not have instituted the compelled speech requirement.
(It is LIE-berals seeking votes and criminals looking for ways to avoid prosecution and special interest groups seeking govt funding for selfish pet projects who are all convinced we are “systemic racists”! The LIE-beral”evidence is CLEARLY FLAWED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
So, what do I mean that research on which LSO relied is extremely flawed? Dr. Clifton — a sociologist who has taught social research methodology courses for almost 40 years — offers around 20 pages detailing the serious problems. You can read his full report on the CCF website.
The condensed, column-length version is that there are four main deficiencies in the study — which was designed and conducted by Strategic Communications Inc. at the request of the LSO’s Working Group on Challenges Faced by Racialized Licensees and the LSO’s Equity Initiative Department.
(In other words the people sponsoring the research EXPECTED to find racism and are prepared to USE DISTORTED AND FAKE EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
There are four main deficiencies in the study
It turns out the first fault marring the research is the sort of error one learns about in Research Methodology 101: confirmation bias. Focus group participants, survey respondents, and key “informants” - people whose answers were used to reach the study’s ultimate conclusions -were presented with questions that made repeated statements about the effects of racialization on the success of lawyers and paralegals.
Being exposed to these statements so many times made the study participants more likely to confirm the statements. The repetitive construction of the questions unduly shaped the responses.
The repetitive construction of the questions unduly shaped the responses
(And of course IF systemic racism was operating then clearly there WOULD be influence on peoples careers! But DOES systemic racism exist in Canada? The available evidence is CLEARLY tainted by LIE-beral BIAS!! LIE-berals WANT TO FIND RACISM for their own selfish reasons- and so they FOUND what they sought by DISHONEST RESEARCH METHODS!!!!!!!!)
That’s likely of lesser concern than the second problem, which is that in all these surveys and conversations and focus groups, it’s entirely possible that no one knew what they were talking about. Or at the very least, no one trying to interpret the results can be sure of what the respondents were talking about. The term “racialized” is new, confusing and imprecise, and not even the authors of the study could decide what it meant, telling survey respondents that the term “is either or both an imposed or chosen self-identity” - respondent’s choice!
That means that it’s not even possible to know what the study was measuring. In effect, any lawyer or paralegal of any colour or origin could be accurately classified as “racialized” … and also as “non-racialized”; it just depends how that lawyer or paralegal feels.
(IN a society that condemns “white privilege” am I NOT RACIALIZED since LIE-berals think I have “UNDESERVED privileges”!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
(And by simply “inviting” volunteers to participate- it seems logical that those who spoke up would be the radical ones with a biased axe to grind!!!!!!!!!!!)
But there is a special place in research methodology hell for the third issue with the report: the sample was not representative of the population about which conclusions were made. To have obtained meaningful results about Ontario lawyers and paralegals, it would have been necessary to hear from some sort of random sample of these people. Instead, the study based its survey conclusions on the responses of 3,237 self-selected lawyers and paralegals. The rest of the over 40,000 chose not to participate.
(One has to wonder if some lawyers refused to be involved for fear of being censured by LIE-beral hug a thug judges! In the midst of a LIE-beral witch hunt- those who hold strong anti LIE-beral opinions are at risk!!!!!!!!!!!!)
The fourth identified problem with the study is the absence of control variables, which makes it impossible to accurately assess cause and effect. Other than that, truly great work, LSO.
(LIE-berals of course SCORN control variables because such stuff makes it HARDER for LIE-berals to justify their SELFISH conclusions!!!!!!!!!!!!)
