What's Trump Done Now?

[AnnaEmber]

Sundland's 2+2=4, turned out to be 0 for 3, and if you can't understand that reference you haven't been following the Inquiry. And he had the only 1st hand information

No, he didn't have the only first-hand evidence. There were also Giuliani, Trump himself, Zelensky, Barr, and Mulvaney.
Like I said, you can't seem to add the parts together so you just deny evidence. lmao

 

[AnnaEmber]

You mean when Biden did ?

Not referring to Biden; he isn't the prez.

 

[AnnaEmber]

Presumed is what Trump wanted end of story and impeachment.

geeezez Then I guess the USA should get rid of all it's laws about "attempted" crimes. No more "attempted murder", "attempted kidnap", "attemtped theft", etc.
Brilliant! hahaha

 

[Twin_Moose]

No, he didn't have the only first-hand evidence. There were also Giuliani, Trump himself, Zelensky, Barr, and Mulvaney.
Like I said, you can't seem to add the parts together so you just deny evidence. lmao

Trump and Zelensky said there was nothing, and I must have missed it when the rest testified, btw which day did they testify on? Or are you mind reading?

 

[AnnaEmber]

So did Joe Biden not brag that he withheld aid to Ukraine until the prosecutor of his son’s company was fired ? Is that not relevant to the subject at hand ?

That question is relevant, but not the focus of Trump's impeachment. It may speak to why Trump tried blackmail but that's it.
Sorry that you can't seem to figure that out.

 

[JLM]

That question is relevant, but not the focus of Trump's impeachment. It may speak to why Trump tried blackmail but that's it.
Sorry that you can't seem to figure that out.

Really nothing to figure out with this charade, just a bunch of god damn nonsense and sour grapes!

 

[AnnaEmber]

Trump and Zelensky said there was nothing, and I must have missed it when the rest testified, btw which day did they testify on? Or are you mind reading?

Attaboy, just assume there's no evidence.
Like I said, forget it.
No amount of evidence is sufficient for Trump's "believers". I think it was Plato that said, "To form a belief about important matters without possessing sufficient evidence—or to believe anything with a degree of firmness that is not proportioned to the strength of our evidence—is to misuse our faculties and court all manner of error."
And the evidence is building against Trump.

 

[AnnaEmber]

Really nothing to figure out with this charade, just a bunch of god damn nonsense and sour grapes!

Attaboy, deny deny deny.

 

[Walter]

Biden’s admission to bribery, quid pro quo or coercion begins at the two minute mark.

Well, son of a bitch.

 

[Twin_Moose]

Attaboy, just assume there's no evidence.
Like I said, forget it.
No amount of evidence is sufficient for Trump's "believers". I think it was Plato that said, "To form a belief about important matters without possessing sufficient evidence—or to believe anything with a degree of firmness that is not proportioned to the strength of our evidence—is to misuse our faculties and court all manner of error."
And the evidence is building against Trump.

Any evidence would help, all your references to first hand evidence, besides Zelensky, never testified so there again is no proof, because they didn't testify is not proof in itself.

 

[Curious Cdn]

Any evidence would help, all your references to first hand evidence, besides Zelensky, never testified so there again is no proof, because they didn't testify is not proof in itself.

So, it's all over tomorrow, then?

SAVED BY TWIN MOOSE!

You should take over from Rudi Guiliani. He can't seem to grasp the bigger picture the way that you do.

 

[AnnaEmber]

Any evidence would help, all your references to first hand evidence, besides Zelensky, never testified so there again is no proof, because they didn't testify is not proof in itself.

lmao You have no idea what proof is if you say there is no proof. Just because all there is so far is circumstantial evidence, does NOT mean that there is no proof. Get a grip.

lol Like I said, forget it. The issue is obviously waaaay over your abilities to understand.

 

[Cliffy]

Migrant boy was in visible distress before death inside Border Patrol cell



More: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/carlos...old-migrant-boys-death-in-border-patrol-cell/

 

[Walter]

Migrant boy was in visible distress before death inside Border Patrol cell
More: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/carlos...old-migrant-boys-death-in-border-patrol-cell/

No teenager has ever died of the flu before.

 

[Curious Cdn]

No teenager has ever died of the flu before.

Not too many of them in American Government concentration camps, anyway.

 

[Danbones]

Not see any down at the new Libyan slave markets?

 

[Walter]

Not too many of them in American Government concentration camps, anyway.

Well, maybe in FDR’s Nip camps.

 

[Hoid]

Fond memories for the racist

 

[Twin_Moose]

So, it's all over tomorrow, then?
SAVED BY TWIN MOOSE!
You should take over from Rudi Guiliani. He can't seem to grasp the bigger picture the way that you do.

We'll see when he hands his report over to the DOJ
Tomorrow will be interesting

lmao You have no idea what proof is if you say there is no proof. Just because all there is so far is circumstantial evidence, does NOT mean that there is no proof. Get a grip.
lol Like I said, forget it. The issue is obviously waaaay over your abilities to understand.

WTF?

Especially like the comment because there is no evidence doesn't mean there is no proof Wow just WOW!

 

[petros]

REO Speed Wagon.