What's right about our health-care system

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Prove what, Anna? That a doctor is taxed on his net earnings, not his gross earnings? If you need that to be proved to you, you need a very basic, elementary course in income tax. Refer to any brochure about taxes and you will see that it is the net earnings that are taxed, not gross earnings. And not only for a doctor, but for any business.
Show us. Till then it's only your opinion.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Prove it.

Let me explain to you in simple terms, Anna. Suppose a business (doctor, lawyer, restaurant, store etc.) has expenses of 500,000 $ in a year and has income of 600,000 $, then the business does not have to pay tax on 600,000 $, but only on 100,000$ which is the profit.

If a business had to pay taxes on gross earnings (earnings before deducting expenses), most of the businesses will go broke in short order.



If you need further proof, you will just have to read the tax literature.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Show us. Till then it's only your opinion.

You are welcome to think what you like Anna, it just tells me that you have never run a business. Let us just take the case I took in the last example. If a business has expenses of 500,000, gross income of 600,000 and the profit of 100,000, it is taxed on 100,000 and gets to keep perhaps 70000 $ from it.

If the business is taxed on 600,000 $, the tax bill would be 180,000 $. Not only would that eat up all the profits, but then the business would be actually in the loss to the tune of 80,000. That would be a crazy way to do business, and it is not done that way in any country.

As to what you want to believe, that is your affair. If the White Queen can believe six impossible things before breakfast, why can’t you?
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
You are welcome to think what you like Anna, it just tells me that you have never run a business.
You're operating on ASSumption again. You appear to make that a habit, unfortunately for you.
Let us just take the case I took in the last example.
Take any case you want. This is all only your say so and means nothing.
If a business has expenses of 500,000, gross income of 600,000 and the profit of 100,000, it is taxed on 100,000 and gets to keep perhaps 70000 $ from it.

If the business is taxed on 600,000 $, the tax bill would be 180,000 $. Not only would that eat up all the profits, but then the business would be actually in the loss to the tune of 80,000. That would be a crazy way to do business, and it is not done that way in any country.
So?

As to what you want to believe, that is your affair. If the White Queen can believe six impossible things before breakfast, why can’t you?
Another ASSumption? You sure are loaded with ASSumption. Did I say anything about what I believe since you stated your opinion about my accuracy? No.

At any rate, this is sidetracking the issue and my point is that Canada's healthcare system, although not the worst, could be a LOT better.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Let me explain to you in simple terms, Anna. Suppose a business (doctor, lawyer, restaurant, store etc.) has expenses of 500,000 $ in a year and has income of 600,000 $, then the business does not have to pay tax on 600,000 $, but only on 100,000$ which is the profit.

If a business had to pay taxes on gross earnings (earnings before deducting expenses), most of the businesses will go broke in short order.



If you need further proof, you will just have to read the tax literature.
You really don't have a clue when someone is taking you for a ride, do you? lmao

"Round and round the mulberry bush...."
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
At any rate, this is sidetracking the issue and my point is that Canada's healthcare system, although not the worst, could be a LOT better.

It is not side tracking the issue, Anna You made a serious mistake in your calculations and are too proud to admit it. In order not to admit making the mistake, you claimed some crazy way of taxation as the genuine taxation. You made a mistake, don’t want to admit it and that is the end of story.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
You really don't have a clue when someone is taking you for a ride, do you? Lmao

Yeah, right Anna. When you claimed that gross earnings (earnings before deducting expenses) are taxed, and performed wrong calculations based upon that, you were taking me for a ride. You made a mistake and that is all there is to it. Now if you want to cover up your mistake, by claiming that ‘you were taking me for a ride’ (whatever that means in this context), that is your affair.

But all this tells me is that you made a serious a mistake in the calculations (mistake to the tune of 30,000 dollars) and are too proud to admit it.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
You're operating on ASSumption again. You appear to make that a habit, unfortunately for you.

It is a safe assumption that you have never run a business, Anna. If you ran a business and paid taxes on gross earnings (before deducting expenses), I am sure the government will love you, they may even honour you, give you a medal or something for paying taxes over and above the call of duty. But you won’t last one year in your business.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
At any rate, this is sidetracking the issue and my point is that Canada's healthcare system, although not the worst, could be a LOT better.

It is not side tracking the issue, Anna You made a serious mistake in your calculations and are too proud to admit it. In order not to admit making the mistake, you claimed some crazy way of taxation as the genuine taxation. You made a mistake, don’t want to admit it and that is the end of story.
Sorry. You've made another ASSumption again. I made a mistake and was just taking you for your own type of ride. See, I can admit to making a mistake, you can't. I have more balls than you do. lmao
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
You really don't have a clue when someone is taking you for a ride, do you? Lmao

Yeah, right Anna. When you claimed that gross earnings (earnings before deducting expenses) are taxed, and performed wrong calculations based upon that, you were taking me for a ride. You made a mistake and that is all there is to it. Now if you want to cover up your mistake, by claiming that ‘you were taking me for a ride’ (whatever that means in this context), that is your affair.
Sorry. You're wrong again. I am not as childish as you.

But all this tells me is that you made a serious a mistake in the calculations (mistake to the tune of 30,000 dollars) and are too proud to admit it.
Nope. I was simply doing what you do. Except that I don't drop the thread skulk off to another thread when I make a mistake like you do. :D
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
Sorry. You've made another ASSumption again. I made a mistake and was just taking you for your own type of ride. See, I can admit to making a mistake, you can't. I have more balls than you do. lmao

Oh, so finally after all this back and forth you admit to making a mistake. How generous of you! Was it so difficult to admit it the first time, when I pointed out the mistake? You tried to wriggle out of it, and when you couldn’t you finally admitted the mistake.

Anyway, at least you admitted it, that is something.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
You're operating on ASSumption again. You appear to make that a habit, unfortunately for you.

It is a safe assumption that you have never run a business, Anna. If you ran a business and paid taxes on gross earnings (before deducting expenses), I am sure the government will love you, they may even honour you, give you a medal or something for paying taxes over and above the call of duty. But you won’t last one year in your business.
It's an ASSumption based on what you think I meant in something I said. That is foolish.
I ran a business with a partner for almost 13 years.
I made a mistake in my calculations. You are right about that, but that's ALL you are right about.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Oh, so finally after all this back and forth you admit to making a mistake. How generous of you! Was it so difficult to admit it the first time, when I pointed out the mistake? You tried to wriggle out of it, and when you couldn’t you finally admitted the mistake.

Anyway, at least you admitted it, that is something.
Actually it isn't such a big deal when a girl has more balls than po lil ol you. :D
It has nothing to do with being generous or wiggling. It's simply the way it is and I can accept that. Apparently you insist upon riding along on your ASSumptions, though.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Big difference, not much of a decent alternative. I meant what we have is the lesser of two evils. But the longer we have Campbull in, the smaller the difference becomes. He and his cronies aren't exactly what I would call primo material. I can't stand the NDP either. But we are stuck with the two, so we are the losers.

My husband and I have voted NDP all of our lives , 'provincially'. All of our choices are not exactly what we want, I don't know anyone who has ever said
that they have finally found the party that meets all of their wishes.
politics is politics, it's all about the vote, and the biggest problem with
it is the apathy of the voters, such a small turnout. We have the power
to make a big difference, but most are indifferent, don't care, complain, but
don't have their own opinion, just following someone else, or they say they
won't vote, because they don't trust any of them, what a waste, that proves
nothing.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
Anyway, I'll attempt to set the issue back on track.
I think we have a decent system, but it cannot continue without amending it. It will simply get worse and worse as our population grows, the baby boomers hit old age, etc.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
My husband and I have voted NDP all of our lives , 'provincially'. All of our choices are not exactly what we want, I don't know anyone who has ever said
that they have finally found the party that meets all of their wishes.
politics is politics, it's all about the vote, and the biggest problem with
it is the apathy of the voters, such a small turnout. We have the power
to make a big difference, but most are indifferent, don't care, complain, but
don't have their own opinion, just following someone else, or they say they
won't vote, because they don't trust any of them, what a waste, that proves
nothing.
Yup. I cannot see anything changing until we as voters get together and insist upon change. But I won't hold my breath on that idea because it is as you say, voters' apathy..... and voters' fear of change.
 

talloola

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 14, 2006
19,576
113
63
Vancouver Island
Yup. I cannot see anything changing until we as voters get together and insist upon change. But I won't hold my breath on that idea because it is as you say, voters' apathy..... and voters' fear of change.

the voters are lazy, uninterested in politics, can't be bothered, they can't even
bother being afraid of anything, they like to complain, but don't care to contribute.
 

AnnaG

Hall of Fame Member
Jul 5, 2009
17,507
117
63
I found some more info about Canada concerning healthcare and it's from our own government: go figure. If things DON'T improve we will experience the same problems that exist now, but on a larger scale.

Research About - Aging - CIHR

Wow. I didn't think this was as big an issue as it appears to be:

http://qnc.queensu.ca/story_loader.php?id=3f2fb55a816fc

Low birth-weight puts babies at a higher risk for ill health. As of 2007, the stats for increasing low birth weights was rising.

CTV.ca | Low birth weight rates in Canada on the rise

Interesting:

Healthcare Economist · Health Care System Grudge Match: Canada vs. U.S.

the waiting times for many procedures in Canada seems long. In a report titled The Wait Time Strategy (available as a pdf at the health.gov.on.ca website) the number of days between decision to treat and treatment is listed. These are the average number of days waiting for December 2006 and January 2007.
Cancer Surgery 68 days
Angiography 28 days
Angioplasty 17 days
Bypass Surgery 48 days
Cataract Surgery 183 days
Hip Replacement 257 days
Knee Replacement 307 days
MRI 105 days
CT 62 days​
 
Last edited:

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
I guess we'll need some good old yankee know how to fix our health care, it's about time the private sector slithered up to the plate and took over before the government totally screws it.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
It's an ASSumption based on what you think I meant in something I said. That is foolish.
I ran a business with a partner for almost 13 years.
I made a mistake in my calculations. You are right about that, but that's ALL you are right about.


Sure you made a mistake, Anna. We all make mistakes, no big deal. It became a big deal when you refused to admit it, when you tried to wriggle out of it. When I pointed out the mistake to you, if you had agreed right then that yes, it indeed was a mistake, we would have moved on. You made such a big deal of it.