Not when you have to show x number of metres per day per x amount of cash and guarantee x amount of man hours so labour can make EI and you still have to put up the cash long before you'll see any benefits (if any) at tax time.
What to do about global warming
- Thread starter Extrafire
- Start date
Not true at all.
What's wrong with AC?
How it's powered is the problem.
I use geothermal tech to cool my home with the aid of solar panels to run the pump and fan.
Very efficient.
My cottage runs in a similar manner.
Avro still hasn't figured-out that these subsidies are based entirely on risking capital in advance and the tax incentive is measured against revenues from those operations... But this is no different for many industrial sectors excepting wind and solar power that receive grants in addition to subsidies in order to artificially support their industry.
Very similar to the tar sands when oil was cheap.
If you want to summise that the green energy movment has a vested interest here I won't argue.
It's called capitlaism....something petros despises....well...depending on who is profitting from it that is.
All of that dosen't change the science of AGW.
:lol:
How many in the 3000 page report?
2....wow...totally debunked.:lol:
That's what real scientists do when they get anything wrong, try and get that from Mocnkton or Gore.
Like getting blood from a stone.;-)
Sometimes someone has some dignity in the face of actual facts though.:lol:
Is the science of the origin of species perfect?
No, but the general idea is true....yet the creationists fight it to keep those plates topped up.
Extra's voice of reason, calls for a carbon tax, and says that investments now will have global warming mitigated by the end of the century, using current and in the pipeline technology.
Huh, what a groundbreaking idea... :lol:
Bjørn Lomborg: $100bn a year needed to fight climate change | Environment | The Guardian
Huh, what a groundbreaking idea... :lol:
Bjørn Lomborg: $100bn a year needed to fight climate change | Environment | The Guardian
The only thing that is debunked here is the UN/IPCC. The 2 we've spoken of doesn't include the irresponsible predictions and allegations of causation of other/many issues (ie Netherlands losing land due to GW consequences).
Really Avro, the 2 retractions that you believe are somehow support for your failing position are only the tip of the iceberg.
Real scientists ensure that they don't base their theories on a bevy of inaccuracies.
No one is attempting to tax evolution now, are they?
Funny comment, that's exactly what I think about you Truthers.
A company this month set a world record for solar photovoltaic efficiency, at 42.3%, which absolutely blows away the current roof-top installations which come in at about 12%. Three and a half times more energy production from the same area of collectors. For those paying attention, that could make two wedges much easier.
Nice, but what does that do about 500 Mt salts added to farm land annually which is increased even further by tilling and irrigation which all wash into the ocean modifying pH?
I know. That's why you are stuck believing CO2 is the problem and that taxing it will save the planet.
Can't be done, the only future is coal and oil.
I'm going to start sniffing glue because I'd like to be deluded as well.
I'm going to start sniffing glue because I'd like to be deluded as well.
No, because you jump pages without notice. Why would a more efficient solar panel mean 500 Mt of salts added to farmland? We're not on risperidol like you are. Slow down and include context, or go out and yell at the planes crossing your skies.
Bummer. What do solar panels have to do with falsly monetizing a gas and restricting growth for the 85% of the planet who are subsistance farmers. Do you know what those people do at night instead of sitting around a lit room with a TV on? They sleep.