What Are the Consequences of Obama Failing?

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
"Why would I? I don't consider him to be a source of information, comparible say to the Encyclopedia Brittanica. But having said that you are still a couple of notches away too."

It takes special talent to make an insult wrapped in compliment (or for that matter a compliment wrapped in an insult) sound real. You have succeeded.

Thank you, I guess I've struck a good balance.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
It takes special talent to make an insult wrapped in compliment (or for that matter a compliment wrapped in an insult) sound real. You have succeeded.

You are right, JLM, Yukon is complimenting you here. That is the only way to deliver an insult or a putdown, wrap it up in a compliment, put a nice, polite language. Sometimes the object of the compliment doesn’t even realize that he has been insulted.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
:roll:
Anyway, I like what semi-recluse Reuben said even if it is a little oversimplified.
If Obama succeeds or fails it doesn't make a pinch of coonshyte of difference. The economy will recover, some other batch of idiots will be running countries, in a few decades another economic mess will happen again because people will make the same mistakes again, and so on, so forth.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
548
113
Vernon, B.C.
:roll:
Anyway, I like what semi-recluse Reuben said even if it is a little oversimplified.
If Obama succeeds or fails it doesn't make a pinch of coonshyte of difference. The economy will recover, some other batch of idiots will be running countries, in a few decades another economic mess will happen again because people will make the same mistakes again, and so on, so forth.

Exactly right, we all spend too much time worry about stuff we have little control over (just wish I could control worrying:lol:)
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
:roll:
Anyway, I like what semi-recluse Reuben said even if it is a little oversimplified.
If Obama succeeds or fails it doesn't make a pinch of coonshyte of difference. The economy will recover, some other batch of idiots will be running countries, in a few decades another economic mess will happen again because people will make the same mistakes again, and so on, so forth.

Not quite, Gilbert. If economy recovers next year, same batch of idiots will be running the countries. If economy recovers in 2010, Democrats keep the control of House and the Senate next year, and Obama will be a huge favorite to win in 2012.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
Not quite, Gilbert. If economy recovers next year, same batch of idiots will be running the countries. If economy recovers in 2010, Democrats keep the control of House and the Senate next year, and Obama will be a huge favorite to win in 2012.
I can tell; you're a short-term thinker. I think in decades, not years. Or else I am think about today and tomorrow. Stuff in between is just stuff.
 

lone wolf

Grossly Underrated
Nov 25, 2006
32,493
212
63
In the bush near Sudbury
Pretty much. And short-term thinking is the bane of the country as far as politics is concerned. Politicians only think in terms of, well, terms.

Politicians won't deflection plan. Twenty years ahead is a waste in terms may be over before the results are in. That's why we get schools, highways and power projects that come online already obsolete.
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
It's a word. Lets try and use it

the

1   /stressed ði; unstressed before a consonant ðə; unstressed before a vowel ði/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [stressed th
ee; unstressed before a consonant th
uh; unstressed before a vowel th
ee] Show IPA –definite article 1. (used, esp. before a noun, with a specifying or particularizing effect, as opposed to the indefinite or generalizing force of the indefinite article a or an): the book you gave me; Come into the house. 2. (used to mark a proper noun, natural phenomenon, ship, building, time, point of the compass, branch of endeavor, or field of study as something well-known or unique): the sun; the Alps; the Queen Elizabeth; the past; the West. 3. (used with or as part of a title): the Duke of Wellington; the Reverend John Smith. 4. (used to mark a noun as indicating the best-known, most approved, most important, most satisfying, etc.): the skiing center of the U.S.; If you're going to work hard, now is the time. 5. (used to mark a noun as being used generically): The dog is a quadruped. 6. (used in place of a possessive pronoun, to note a part of the body or a personal belonging): He won't be able to play football until the leg mends. 7. (used before adjectives that are used substantively, to note an individual, a class or number of individuals, or an abstract idea): to visit the sick; from the sublime to the ridiculous. 8. (used before a modifying adjective to specify or limit its modifying effect): He took the wrong road and drove miles out of his way. 9. (used to indicate one particular decade of a lifetime or of a century): the sixties; the gay nineties. 10. (one of many of a class or type, as of a manufactured item, as opposed to an individual one): Did you listen to the radio last night? 11. enough: He saved until he had the money for a new car. She didn't have the courage to leave. 12. (used distributively, to note any one separately) for, to, or in each; a or an: at one dollar the pound.
 

SirJosephPorter

Time Out
Nov 7, 2008
11,956
56
48
Ontario
If the shoe fits...... go for it. I don't plan on dying for a couple more, though.

I don’t’ know about you, but I will definitely be dead in a few decades. So I don’t see any point in worrying about what will happen 50 or 100 years from now, let the next generation (or the one after) worry about that.
 

YukonJack

Time Out
Dec 26, 2008
7,026
73
48
Winnipeg
"I don’t’ know about you, but I will definitely be dead in a few decades. So I don’t see any point in worrying about what will happen 50 or 100 years from now, let the next generation (or the one after) worry about that."​

So, quit being a hypocrit of monumental (or just MENTAL) proportions and stop pretending that you give a good damn about Global Warming/Climate Change.​

BTW, did you tell your son, of whom you are inordinately proud, how you despise his generation?

Hope you will leave him enough funds (With a doctor wife, it should be easy) to pay all the debt you leave for him to pay.​
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
I don’t’ know about you, but I will definitely be dead in a few decades. So I don’t see any point in worrying about what will happen 50 or 100 years from now, let the next generation (or the one after) worry about that.
Well, you do what you want. I don't plan 50 or a hundred years ahead on most things to do with people (people's interaction with nature, yes). A few decades is plenty, IMO, or at least one. I pretty much planned when I was in my early 20s to be retired at my age, and I am. Either way it's still a lot longer than jackass pols plan in Canuckville. You may disagree if you like, but the evidence isn't in your favor.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
71
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
"I don’t’ know about you, but I will definitely be dead in a few decades. So I don’t see any point in worrying about what will happen 50 or 100 years from now, let the next generation (or the one after) worry about that."​

So, quit being a hypocrit of monumental (or just MENTAL) proportions and stop pretending that you give a good damn about Global Warming/Climate Change.​

BTW, did you tell your son, of whom you are inordinately proud, how you despise his generation?

Hope you will leave him enough funds (With a doctor wife, it should be easy) to pay all the debt you leave for him to pay.​
lol
Right on, YJ.