What a Bunch of Real Men!

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
60,430
9,580
113
Washington DC
A proposed rule published by the National Park Service in the Federal Register would let Alaskan game officials decide whether bear cubs can be killed alongside their mothers, caribou can be shot from a boat while swimming, wolves, including pups, can be hunted in their dens and other animals can be targeted from airplanes and snowmobiles. Animals could also be baited with sweets and killed or poisoned.

The Park Service said its proposal is consistent with an order by Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to accede to states’ wishes to expand recreational hunting. “The purpose of this proposed rule is to align sport hunting regulations in national preserves in Alaska with State of Alaska regulations and to enhance consistency with harvest regulations on surrounding non-federal lands and waters,” officials wrote. “The proposed rule would apply the State of Alaska’s hunting regulations to national preserve lands, with limited exceptions.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...at-many-say-are-cruel/?utm_term=.55f57c46efaa

To the MAGAhats, I have a few observations:

1. I know the first words out of your mouths will be "Whatabout how Indians hunted?" So, nice try at diversion, complete with a soupcon of racism.

2. "Indians" didn't hunt any particular way. You're talking about 1/5 of the world's population, thousands of cultures, over 15,000 years. But you saw this movie. . .

3. Aside from your limp-dick attempts to divert, are you really stupid enough to think should be no difference between the hunting methods of stone-age subsistence hunters and electronics-age sport hunters?

4. Oh. . . wait. . . of course you are. After all, you're birthers.
 
Last edited:

Johnnny

Frontiersman
Jun 8, 2007
9,388
124
63
Third rock from the Sun
Pretty dumb rule to be proposing. If the Alaskan people Kiboshed the Pebble Creek Copper Mine then I don't think this will go completely through, although who knows.

And whoa to the rest of the post.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Yes we are all in the pane here. Some of us are retired too.
:)

Personally (and technically), I don't need a gun to hunt...because I do know something about the way Indians hunted here.

The real change guns have brought is that someone else makes a profit off your hunt too.
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
A proposed rule published by the National Park Service in the Federal Register would let Alaskan game officials decide whether bear cubs can be killed alongside their mothers, caribou can be shot from a boat while swimming, wolves, including pups, can be hunted in their dens and other animals can be targeted from airplanes and snowmobiles. Animals could also be baited with sweets and killed or poisoned.

The Park Service said its proposal is consistent with an order by Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to accede to states’ wishes to expand recreational hunting. “The purpose of this proposed rule is to align sport hunting regulations in national preserves in Alaska with State of Alaska regulations and to enhance consistency with harvest regulations on surrounding non-federal lands and waters,” officials wrote. “The proposed rule would apply the State of Alaska’s hunting regulations to national preserve lands, with limited exceptions.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...at-many-say-are-cruel/?utm_term=.55f57c46efaa

To the MAGAhats, I have a few observations:

1. I know the first words out of your mouths will be "Whatabout how Indians hunted?" So, nice try at diversion, complete with a soupcon of racism.

2. "Indians" didn't hunt any particular way. You're talking about 1/5 of the world's population, thousands of cultures, over 15,000 years. But you saw this movie. . .

3. Aside from your limp-dick attempts to divert, are you really stupid enough to think should be no difference between the hunting methods of stone-age subsistence hunters and electronics-age sport hunters?

4. Oh. . . wait. . . of course you are. After all, you're birthers.
The only thing in all of that that comes close to making any sense was shooting bear cubs if you killed the mother. I mean you might as well shoot them. The moment you kill the mother those cubs might as well be dead because it's highly unlikely they'll survive. The rest of that shit ain't hunting and calling it "sport" hunting is a f*cking joke.

The rest of your post was nothing but a big ol' strawman.
 

Danbones

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 23, 2015
24,505
2,198
113
Straw mems, LOL, (hic!) now there is a skilled tracker's dream vacation workday.
;)
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island
To make it sporting you should only be able to hunt grizzly with a pointy stick. And pepper spray. Grizzly like a little seasoning on their meat. Survival of the fittest and all that.