Baloney.
You are discussing the philosophy of an evangelical Christian, one who believes in the immortal soul, the special place of human life in the scheme of things. One who believes humanity was granted "dominion" over all living things by God Almighty.
Yup, I know about how righteous they think their sh*t smells, but that doesn't make them right, nor any less contradicting/hypocritical in their thinking processes..... and on top of that, once again, politicians shouldn't have any right to dictate or impose their own religious beliefs on the rest of a nation, which a very good chunk doesn't follow thier beliefs in the first place.
In fact this has been directly been discussed within the US on whether or not politicians should be allowed to milk religious wind bags based on their beliefs in order to get votes..... guess things haven't been decided just yet apparently.
To such a person, treating human life and animal life with the same set of rules would be like saving a cucumber while allowing a child to die.......it is totally foreign to their philosophy.
As it is to mine.
No hypocracy there at all. None.
Sure there is... perhaps not to you or to people like her.... but guess what? Not everybody thinks as you do, just as not everybody thinks the way I do, as you prove this in the above.... but just because you don't think there is any hypocracy or what we are talking about is forign to you, doesn't mean your opinion is absolute.
Mine isn't absolute either.... so if the answers and opinions are not absolute and not everybody agrees with them, then why should one side of the argument be used as an absolute in running for office of any country in the first place?
She's trying to impose her own "Morals" and opinions on the rest of the nation, and at the same time, trying to suck in other religious into getting her into a position where they can impose their religious morals and opinions onto everybody else.
Besides what I already explained as being hypocritical and contradicting, the situation she and McCain are trying to create will only cause even more problems and issues, while not actually dealing with the more important ones people in the US are facing everyday.
That's where I have the biggest issue. Church should remain inside church and your family's home.... it should not be imposed onto others in their own everyday lives.... they have the right to choose their own paths, it should not be forced apon them.
BTW, all you anti-grizzly hunters.........would you care to live in grizzly country where the grizzlies aren't afraid of man?
I already live in an area with a high concentration of Bears..... and nobody in my family, when camping, out on the lake, or otherwise, has had to shoot a bear for years. There are many other alternatives to dealing with bears, other then shooting them.
And you make it sound like she had no choice in killing the bear she has layed out on her couch..... based on the various photos of her showing off her kills while hunting with her buddies, I hardly doubt she had to defend herself against this bear she has decorating her home.... otherwise, I'm sure we would have heard all about that long ago, in order to pump her up as some rambo for the ladies.
And have none of you ever eaten bear meat? I have. Black bear, mind you, I don't know if grizz is edible.
Once again, there's a difference between Trophy Hunting, and Hunting for Food. In fact our own nation allowing Americans to head to our north to go hunting our polar bears for trophys is pretty sick all on its own. I mentioned in the past that their population is probably still in good standing, but just for the sake of a sport or trophy for forigners, I do not agree on.
BTW, the last comment belongs on the school yard, uttered by a 12 year old.
Yeah well I like to think I still have some of my youth left
