CdnBear
Did or didn't Maher Arar get taken off a plane in New York and sent to Syria?
Did or didn't CSIS or the RCMP feed information to the Americans that allowed them to kidnap a Canadian off a plane and send him off to be tortured?
Facts Bear
How about sticking to the topic
YOU raised...
Duly elected government CdnBear? You'd have difficulty convincing many Americans that George W. Bush was the duly elected president of KidnapTortureville....
Neither of us was talking about Arar, until of course you couldn't prove your statement. Then as per the norm...poof, off you go on something else. I'm just glad you didn't claim I use lil Palestinian kids as wheel stops this time.
It seems abundantly clear that many folk here at CC have no problem with America using torture and kidnapping, I hope they feel the same when those actions are taken against Canadians (other than Maher Arar and the youngster in Gitmo) Perhaps we should adopt and extend the notion to Mohawk warriors that smuggled guns across the lake to "support" their Canadian brothers in terrorist activities. Perhaps we shouldn't bother with courts and a system of law at all...we could suspend our system of law in favor of outright racism and hatred ...like the proposition to kill this kid in Guantanamo....why bother with a hearing and evidence if all it takes is some American telling you he's guilty then surely he is and he deserves to die. In fact he's probably responsible for all those WMDs in Iraq and secret CIA prisons all over the world. Sure let's surrender to the axe and the club and completely resign ourselves to barbarism. There's lots of support for that thinking right here.
Why do you people want to put civilian laws and emotions in the feild of combat?
Do you not understand the diffence between the streets of Canada and the dust of a battle zone?
Good Evening, Mikey and Beaver!
You are the two towering cedars of this forum - strong, enduring, calm and kind! I like to sit underneath your low branches at times to listen and laugh. I very much appreciate your comments and support.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Of course you love their words, they use no facts to support their claims, just emotional bleating and opinion based on emotion.
Have been cruising the web. :roll: :-( That Rolling Stone site from yesterday which got me a lot of flak, actually seems to be from the Rolling Stones...Mic Jagger and company. I wasn't aware of that yesterday. That group is of international fame, they sure travel the world and hear and see a lot. It would be foolish to publish something that is untrue. Take that to mind, CDNBear!
There is a monumental difference Op/Ed pieces and real news, truth is one thing, spinning the truth is another. That is something you need to learn. Perhaps you should upgrade to the Enquirer or the Weekly News for a better grasp of reality.
Real news contains no inflective or emotional charging wordage. It contains facts free of any emotion. That is true journalism, some of a rare commodity these days. Which is refected in all uninformed individuals skirting the net as if they are modern day 'Plato's'.
Did you actually
not get my softly sarcastic "journalism" yesterday?? I carried you the whole time like a little boy on my arm!

:smile:
You could carry a thought if I taped a bucket of them to your head.
Here is a Wikipedia site especially for you, Bear, but anybody could benefit from reading it. One can unhesitatingly conclude that the Iraqis and the Afghanis are sub-humans in the eyes of the Americans!! I do not understand their hatred and complete disrespect for human dignity!! To realize, we have a Canadian bear just like those ***** amongst us, gives me the shivers!!
First off, shiver all you want. Because of people like me, you are free to feel and speak as you do. So carry on and you're welcome.
Secondly, I have no idea howmany times I've punch more holes in wiki material then Carter has liver spots.
a)Wikipedia is a member driven encyclopedia. Anyone with an agenda can manipulate a page with malicious and erronious intent.
b)The page you used has no less the 38 supporting links, only 5 of which are external, none of which have support documentation to the source of the material. Furthermore, the internal links are also member edited and therefore open to abuse and up for serious scrutiny.
c)There were 15 criminals involved in the event highlighted in that page and they were charge. Seems like the UCMJ is working well there.
Here, try this sight for wiki data...
http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Wikitruth:Introduction
Or even better...
http://www.wikiality.com/Main_Page
It fits your journalistic requirements to a 't'.
a sample: "In sworn statements to Army investigators, soldiers describe one female interrogator with a taste for humiliation stepping on the neck of one prostrate detainee and kicking another in the genitals. They tell of a shackled prisoner being forced to roll back and forth on the floor of a cell, kissing the boots of his two interrogators as he went. Yet another prisoner is made to pick plastic bottle caps out of a drum mixed with excrement and water as part of a strategy to soften him up for questioning."
Your point?
Someone is doing something ugly, so you don't have and even more importantly, so you can sleep tight and be free in the am.
I thought after WW2 we had left the Dark Age and entered into a new millennium of enlightenment, peace and good will among nations. Did I get off at the wrong Planet?
This would be true, if the people who heard the horrific stories retold by the survivors, didn't take what they were told and turn it into a campaign of coddling and learned what was the true intent.
Stop the horror, before it gets big enough to engulf the globe.
If we were to use ugly, sellective, isolated, surgical tactical strikes to quash what would ferment into a viral contagen, the spread of hatred would cease and the necessity for people like me would end.