US Election 2020 🇺🇸 🤯

Nick Danger

Council Member
Jul 21, 2013
1,801
465
83
Penticton, BC
It's a challenge somedays ferreting out trustworthy information from among the bias, manipulation and misdirection. But sometimes it's easy, like in the article linked to above. Two paragraphs in and you know this was written for Trump cheerleaders, with next to no regard for truth and accuracy, and as such safe to walk away from completely.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
113,345
12,818
113
Low Earth Orbit
It's a challenge somedays ferreting out trustworthy information from among the bias, manipulation and misdirection. But sometimes it's easy, like in the article linked to above. Two paragraphs in and you know this was written for Trump cheerleaders, with next to no regard for truth and accuracy, and as such safe to walk away from completely.
If there is nothing to hide, there is no reason to try blocking the nothing from being seen.

Explain the intense opposition to audits.

Would you make a stink if you were at the border and CBSA decides to verify your declaration and search your vehicle or do you say "no problem, I have nothing to hide"?
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,967
6,093
113
Twin Moose Creek
It's a challenge somedays ferreting out trustworthy information from among the bias, manipulation and misdirection. But sometimes it's easy, like in the article linked to above. Two paragraphs in and you know this was written for Trump cheerleaders, with next to no regard for truth and accuracy, and as such safe to walk away from completely.
Best way to rebuke it is by proving it, and putting the issue to bed, if nothing questionable happened the vast majority would move on and maybe even turn on Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros and Danbones

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,967
6,093
113
Twin Moose Creek
If Gov. is paying very little to audit why not help the process? In Arizona Gov. only has $125k invested the rest is payed by donors, and that shouldn't matter if full transparency of the process is on display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petros

Dixie Cup

Senate Member
Sep 16, 2006
6,031
3,819
113
Edmonton
I don't know why the Dems are so against audits because, according to them, it will only show that they won the election. If this is true, then why are they so against the audits? Obviously, (or maybe not) they seem to be worried that something might prove them wrong which is also why the Big Tech companies cancel anyone who challenges the results of the 2020 election. But the Dems challenged the results of the 2016 election but that was okay apparently.

Bottom line to me is that if they're objecting to said audits, then there is something to hide otherwise why go to such extremes to stop the debate? Since the Dems are famous for declaring the Republicans are doing what in fact the Democrats are doing (listen to the words Gore uses - are they familiar?) He's accusing the Republicans for exactly what it is the Democrats have and are doing - deflection much?

While there are the odd idiots that are claiming that Trump should be re-instated if the audits prove he won, for the most part, Republicans don't want that - they want future elections to be more secure which is why they're insisting on the audits so that this whole mess doesn't happen again. But, of course, the Dems don't want that because if they get away with the stuff they pulled prior to and during the election, then they will always have the advantage. It is clear that there were inconsistencies in the election, some of which should have been challenged before the election but I suspect there wasn't time as the Democrats were very clever in issuing changes just prior to the election. But that was then and this is now and future elections need to be tightened up to avoid any future shenanigan's.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Twin_Moose

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,967
6,093
113
Twin Moose Creek

“He Knows What He Is Saying” – Retweeted by Top Arizona State Senator: Audit will Show “Significant Discrepancies Between Ballots Audited and Original Count”

By Jim Hoft
Published July 4, 2021 at 9:58am
161 Comments

We are all hearing rumblings regarding the audit results.
On Saturday State Senator Wendy Rogers pointed out that State Senator Sonny Borrelli retweeted on what we might expect from the audit team.

The audit will show “significant discrepancies between the ballots audited and the original ballot count.”
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,018
2,416
113
New Brunswick

Turn the audio off, just watch the video which was taken by the protesters themselves.

And then try to justify what happened on the 6th and say it wasn't a "riot" and that what happened wasn't treason and insurrection.
 

Serryah

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 3, 2008
10,018
2,416
113
New Brunswick
Everything. It's state of the art surveillance that can see, hear and smell an ant fart.
No, it has nothing to do with this.

The proof that January 6 was not "peaceful" or that it was "like a group of tourists" is right there.

And anyone who looks at this footage and thinks otherwise, isn't just deluding themselves, but is a goddamn moron.

And as much a terrorist/insurrectionist as they are.
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
21,967
6,093
113
Twin Moose Creek

Turn the audio off, just watch the video which was taken by the protesters themselves.

And then try to justify what happened on the 6th and say it wasn't a "riot" and that what happened wasn't treason and insurrection.




blob:https://nypost.com/8bb3a9e0-c7c6-4194-8bc3-18d3ab8f76c2

oops this is Kavanaugh confirmation