understanding Hudak's job plan poll
- Thread starter Count_Lothian
- Start date
The private sector has always been 'allowed' to create jobs.
Do you think they aren't because a right winged weeny hasn't said to yet?
which of the three clowns should I vote for.........hm......I work in the public sector so Hudak can kiss my azz...he presented really badly with the job cut coming first...any idiot who could not predict how this would affect teachers etc doesn't deserve to lead.... I hope he gets in with a minority...BUT sure as hell don't want any of them in with a majority....
can't decide yet if I am spoiling my ballot or going 3 or 4th party...
libs and cons...are out for me this time around
how's that pension of yours Walter?
Hudak can't create work in a market too expensive to operate in. Wynn is a loser and the NDP want unicorn farms.
My advice to ON voters......
Rent a UHaul and never look back.
My advice to ON voters......
Rent a UHaul and never look back.
Things made in Canada will always be superior to those made in China. Then there is a plethora of services we perform .
You need to understand the broader perspective and know what exactly is being produced and serviced in Ontario.
She is far more a clever person than you will ever dream of being. Who are you to diss her? What exactly do you think you are?
The Liberals have worked their miracles in this province and this country. So have the past Conservatives.
Who are you to even wipe their shoes?
That made me laugh , but you have to understand the Canadian ideal and what we as real Canadians stand for.
Many NDP ideals reflect what we are made of. So many of their ideas are now part and parcel to what we are, Petros.
Many of their platforms were adopted by Liberals and Conservatives in the past. They are part and parcel to what we are as Canadians, petros
I'll leave out the insult towards this nothing comment.
Really ?
You want debate, and to "make people think", and the best you can do is "lmfao".
If simply cutting Corporate taxes was the solution to creating jobs why hasn't anyone else ever thought of that..........?
This policy is an inequality generating machine."- But then, the Cons would hardly be alone in pursuing increased inequality as a policy goal, as Toby Sanger highlights the Hudak PCs' proposed handouts to millionaires at the expense of the general public:
The biggest beneficiaries of corporate tax cuts would be the most profitable of Ontario’s large corporations and, in particular, banks, insurance and other financial service companies. Almost 40 per cent of the tax benefit would go to Ontario’s finance, insurance, and real estate sector, which only employs one out of 13 Ontario workers. This industry would get a tax break estimated at $957 million a year, rising above $1 billion by 2019 and totaling $7.6 billion over eight years.
The other top four industry sectors that would gain the most are trade, with about $3 billion over eight years, manufacturing with an estimated $2.4 billion, and professional services with an estimated $2.2 billion. Almost 80 per cent would go to these four industry sectors: a total of over $15 billion over eight years.
Ontario and federal corporate income and capital tax cuts over the past decade have already reduced the taxes paid by these four sectors by about $7 billion annually. And how much has total employment increased in these four sectors in return for these massive corporate tax cuts over the past decade? A grand total of minus 8,000 jobs – and that’s during a decade when total employment of other sectors in Ontario increased by over 650,000.
If $7 billion in annual tax cuts provided by the McGuinty, Harper and Martin governments didn’t lead to any job growth, it’s hard to believe that Hudak’s additional corporate tax cuts of almost $2 billion a year will do any better.
And Hudak is being particularly obvious about his distaste for those worse off by refusing to even discuss the idea of reducing poverty - even after his party was shamed into supporting anti-poverty legislation not long ago.
This policy is an inequality generating machine."- But then, the Cons would hardly be alone in pursuing increased inequality as a policy goal, as Toby Sanger highlights the Hudak PCs' proposed handouts to millionaires at the expense of the general public:
The biggest beneficiaries of corporate tax cuts would be the most profitable of Ontario’s large corporations and, in particular, banks, insurance and other financial service companies. Almost 40 per cent of the tax benefit would go to Ontario’s finance, insurance, and real estate sector, which only employs one out of 13 Ontario workers. This industry would get a tax break estimated at $957 million a year, rising above $1 billion by 2019 and totaling $7.6 billion over eight years.
The other top four industry sectors that would gain the most are trade, with about $3 billion over eight years, manufacturing with an estimated $2.4 billion, and professional services with an estimated $2.2 billion. Almost 80 per cent would go to these four industry sectors: a total of over $15 billion over eight years.
Ontario and federal corporate income and capital tax cuts over the past decade have already reduced the taxes paid by these four sectors by about $7 billion annually. And how much has total employment increased in these four sectors in return for these massive corporate tax cuts over the past decade? A grand total of minus 8,000 jobs – and that’s during a decade when total employment of other sectors in Ontario increased by over 650,000.
If $7 billion in annual tax cuts provided by the McGuinty, Harper and Martin governments didn’t lead to any job growth, it’s hard to believe that Hudak’s additional corporate tax cuts of almost $2 billion a year will do any better.
And Hudak is being particularly obvious about his distaste for those worse off by refusing to even discuss the idea of reducing poverty - even after his party was shamed into supporting anti-poverty legislation not long ago.